Suitability of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury Instrument for Older People with Traumatic Brain Injury

Yen-Nung Lin, Hei Fen Hwang, Yi Ju Chen, Chui Hsuan Cheng, Wen Miin Liang, Mau-Roung Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We prospectively investigated the psychometric properties of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) instrument among older patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The 37-item QOLIBRI comprises six domains (cognition, self, daily life and autonomy, social relationships, emotions, and physical problems). We recruited 333 patients ≥60 years of age with TBI from the neurosurgery clinics and emergency departments of three hospitals in Taipei, Taiwan. The ceiling and floor values for most QOLIBRI domains were <5%, and the internal consistency and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.84 to 0.97 and 0.83 to 0.96, respectively. For the known-groups validity, patients with TBI attained lower scores for all QOLIBRI domains, except physical problems, compared with those with soft-tissue injuries. Patients with intact cognition who had higher levels on the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) and the Glasgow Coma Scale, fewer limitations in activities of daily living, and fewer chronic conditions obtained higher scores for almost all the QOLIBRI domains, compared with their counterparts. For convergent validity, the correlation coefficients for the QOLIBRI domains and the selected functional measures conceptually related to that domain were all ≥0.4. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the original six-domain structure fit the data with a comparative fit index of ≥0.9. Effect sizes for changes in the GOSE over a 6-month follow-up period were clinically meaningful (≥ 0.2) for all the QOLIBRI domains except emotions. For older people with TBI, the use of the QOLIBRI is generally appropriate, and adding the domain of environment to the scale would be beneficial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1363-1370
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
Volume33
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 15 2016

Fingerprint

Brain Injuries
Quality of Life
Glasgow Outcome Scale
Cognition
Emotions
Soft Tissue Injuries
Glasgow Coma Scale
Traumatic Brain Injury
Neurosurgery
Activities of Daily Living
Taiwan
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical Factor Analysis
Hospital Emergency Service

Keywords

  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of life
  • Taiwan
  • Traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Suitability of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury Instrument for Older People with Traumatic Brain Injury. / Lin, Yen-Nung; Hwang, Hei Fen; Chen, Yi Ju; Cheng, Chui Hsuan; Liang, Wen Miin; Lin, Mau-Roung.

In: Journal of Neurotrauma, Vol. 33, No. 14, 15.07.2016, p. 1363-1370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lin, Yen-Nung ; Hwang, Hei Fen ; Chen, Yi Ju ; Cheng, Chui Hsuan ; Liang, Wen Miin ; Lin, Mau-Roung. / Suitability of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury Instrument for Older People with Traumatic Brain Injury. In: Journal of Neurotrauma. 2016 ; Vol. 33, No. 14. pp. 1363-1370.
@article{848c84ed5db24c8d9593c00e86baa010,
title = "Suitability of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury Instrument for Older People with Traumatic Brain Injury",
abstract = "We prospectively investigated the psychometric properties of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) instrument among older patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The 37-item QOLIBRI comprises six domains (cognition, self, daily life and autonomy, social relationships, emotions, and physical problems). We recruited 333 patients ≥60 years of age with TBI from the neurosurgery clinics and emergency departments of three hospitals in Taipei, Taiwan. The ceiling and floor values for most QOLIBRI domains were <5{\%}, and the internal consistency and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.84 to 0.97 and 0.83 to 0.96, respectively. For the known-groups validity, patients with TBI attained lower scores for all QOLIBRI domains, except physical problems, compared with those with soft-tissue injuries. Patients with intact cognition who had higher levels on the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) and the Glasgow Coma Scale, fewer limitations in activities of daily living, and fewer chronic conditions obtained higher scores for almost all the QOLIBRI domains, compared with their counterparts. For convergent validity, the correlation coefficients for the QOLIBRI domains and the selected functional measures conceptually related to that domain were all ≥0.4. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the original six-domain structure fit the data with a comparative fit index of ≥0.9. Effect sizes for changes in the GOSE over a 6-month follow-up period were clinically meaningful (≥ 0.2) for all the QOLIBRI domains except emotions. For older people with TBI, the use of the QOLIBRI is generally appropriate, and adding the domain of environment to the scale would be beneficial.",
keywords = "Psychometrics, Quality of life, Taiwan, Traumatic brain injury",
author = "Yen-Nung Lin and Hwang, {Hei Fen} and Chen, {Yi Ju} and Cheng, {Chui Hsuan} and Liang, {Wen Miin} and Mau-Roung Lin",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1089/neu.2015.4094",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1363--1370",
journal = "Journal of Neurotrauma",
issn = "0897-7151",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Suitability of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury Instrument for Older People with Traumatic Brain Injury

AU - Lin, Yen-Nung

AU - Hwang, Hei Fen

AU - Chen, Yi Ju

AU - Cheng, Chui Hsuan

AU - Liang, Wen Miin

AU - Lin, Mau-Roung

PY - 2016/7/15

Y1 - 2016/7/15

N2 - We prospectively investigated the psychometric properties of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) instrument among older patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The 37-item QOLIBRI comprises six domains (cognition, self, daily life and autonomy, social relationships, emotions, and physical problems). We recruited 333 patients ≥60 years of age with TBI from the neurosurgery clinics and emergency departments of three hospitals in Taipei, Taiwan. The ceiling and floor values for most QOLIBRI domains were <5%, and the internal consistency and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.84 to 0.97 and 0.83 to 0.96, respectively. For the known-groups validity, patients with TBI attained lower scores for all QOLIBRI domains, except physical problems, compared with those with soft-tissue injuries. Patients with intact cognition who had higher levels on the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) and the Glasgow Coma Scale, fewer limitations in activities of daily living, and fewer chronic conditions obtained higher scores for almost all the QOLIBRI domains, compared with their counterparts. For convergent validity, the correlation coefficients for the QOLIBRI domains and the selected functional measures conceptually related to that domain were all ≥0.4. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the original six-domain structure fit the data with a comparative fit index of ≥0.9. Effect sizes for changes in the GOSE over a 6-month follow-up period were clinically meaningful (≥ 0.2) for all the QOLIBRI domains except emotions. For older people with TBI, the use of the QOLIBRI is generally appropriate, and adding the domain of environment to the scale would be beneficial.

AB - We prospectively investigated the psychometric properties of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) instrument among older patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The 37-item QOLIBRI comprises six domains (cognition, self, daily life and autonomy, social relationships, emotions, and physical problems). We recruited 333 patients ≥60 years of age with TBI from the neurosurgery clinics and emergency departments of three hospitals in Taipei, Taiwan. The ceiling and floor values for most QOLIBRI domains were <5%, and the internal consistency and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.84 to 0.97 and 0.83 to 0.96, respectively. For the known-groups validity, patients with TBI attained lower scores for all QOLIBRI domains, except physical problems, compared with those with soft-tissue injuries. Patients with intact cognition who had higher levels on the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) and the Glasgow Coma Scale, fewer limitations in activities of daily living, and fewer chronic conditions obtained higher scores for almost all the QOLIBRI domains, compared with their counterparts. For convergent validity, the correlation coefficients for the QOLIBRI domains and the selected functional measures conceptually related to that domain were all ≥0.4. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the original six-domain structure fit the data with a comparative fit index of ≥0.9. Effect sizes for changes in the GOSE over a 6-month follow-up period were clinically meaningful (≥ 0.2) for all the QOLIBRI domains except emotions. For older people with TBI, the use of the QOLIBRI is generally appropriate, and adding the domain of environment to the scale would be beneficial.

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Quality of life

KW - Taiwan

KW - Traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977103602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977103602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/neu.2015.4094

DO - 10.1089/neu.2015.4094

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1363

EP - 1370

JO - Journal of Neurotrauma

JF - Journal of Neurotrauma

SN - 0897-7151

IS - 14

ER -