Stress, sleep quality and unplanned Caesarean section in pregnant women

Yi Li Ko, Pi Chu Lin, Shu Chuan Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines the relationship among prenatal maternal stress, sleep quality and unplanned Caesarean delivery. For this research, we adopted a prospective survey design and a sample of 200 women in the early stages of labour. The findings were as follows: (i) 11.5% of the participants underwent unplanned Caesarean sections; (ii) based on a Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index split point of 5, approximately 90.5% of the participants experienced poor sleep quality; and (iii) the odds ratio for primiparas undergoing an unplanned Caesarean section was 4.183 times that for multiparas (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.177 to 14.864), indicating a statistically significant difference. The results also showed that stress was a significant factor related to unplanned Caesarean sections; a 1-point increase on the Pregnancy Stress Rating Scale was associated with a 1.033-fold higher probability of undergoing an unplanned Caesarean section (95% CI=1.002 to 1.065). Furthermore, prenatal stress was a significant variable that can be used to predict unplanned Caesarean deliveries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)454-461
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Practice
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Cesarean Section
Pregnant Women
Sleep
Confidence Intervals
Odds Ratio
Mothers
Pregnancy
Research

Keywords

  • Pregnant women
  • Sleep quality
  • Stress
  • Unplanned Caesarean section

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Stress, sleep quality and unplanned Caesarean section in pregnant women. / Ko, Yi Li; Lin, Pi Chu; Chen, Shu Chuan.

In: International Journal of Nursing Practice, Vol. 21, No. 5, 01.10.2015, p. 454-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{978eeddd4ec64d13a729e3db58c6197a,
title = "Stress, sleep quality and unplanned Caesarean section in pregnant women",
abstract = "This study examines the relationship among prenatal maternal stress, sleep quality and unplanned Caesarean delivery. For this research, we adopted a prospective survey design and a sample of 200 women in the early stages of labour. The findings were as follows: (i) 11.5{\%} of the participants underwent unplanned Caesarean sections; (ii) based on a Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index split point of 5, approximately 90.5{\%} of the participants experienced poor sleep quality; and (iii) the odds ratio for primiparas undergoing an unplanned Caesarean section was 4.183 times that for multiparas (95{\%} confidence interval (CI)=1.177 to 14.864), indicating a statistically significant difference. The results also showed that stress was a significant factor related to unplanned Caesarean sections; a 1-point increase on the Pregnancy Stress Rating Scale was associated with a 1.033-fold higher probability of undergoing an unplanned Caesarean section (95{\%} CI=1.002 to 1.065). Furthermore, prenatal stress was a significant variable that can be used to predict unplanned Caesarean deliveries.",
keywords = "Pregnant women, Sleep quality, Stress, Unplanned Caesarean section",
author = "Ko, {Yi Li} and Lin, {Pi Chu} and Chen, {Shu Chuan}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ijn.12267",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "454--461",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Practice",
issn = "1322-7114",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stress, sleep quality and unplanned Caesarean section in pregnant women

AU - Ko, Yi Li

AU - Lin, Pi Chu

AU - Chen, Shu Chuan

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - This study examines the relationship among prenatal maternal stress, sleep quality and unplanned Caesarean delivery. For this research, we adopted a prospective survey design and a sample of 200 women in the early stages of labour. The findings were as follows: (i) 11.5% of the participants underwent unplanned Caesarean sections; (ii) based on a Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index split point of 5, approximately 90.5% of the participants experienced poor sleep quality; and (iii) the odds ratio for primiparas undergoing an unplanned Caesarean section was 4.183 times that for multiparas (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.177 to 14.864), indicating a statistically significant difference. The results also showed that stress was a significant factor related to unplanned Caesarean sections; a 1-point increase on the Pregnancy Stress Rating Scale was associated with a 1.033-fold higher probability of undergoing an unplanned Caesarean section (95% CI=1.002 to 1.065). Furthermore, prenatal stress was a significant variable that can be used to predict unplanned Caesarean deliveries.

AB - This study examines the relationship among prenatal maternal stress, sleep quality and unplanned Caesarean delivery. For this research, we adopted a prospective survey design and a sample of 200 women in the early stages of labour. The findings were as follows: (i) 11.5% of the participants underwent unplanned Caesarean sections; (ii) based on a Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index split point of 5, approximately 90.5% of the participants experienced poor sleep quality; and (iii) the odds ratio for primiparas undergoing an unplanned Caesarean section was 4.183 times that for multiparas (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.177 to 14.864), indicating a statistically significant difference. The results also showed that stress was a significant factor related to unplanned Caesarean sections; a 1-point increase on the Pregnancy Stress Rating Scale was associated with a 1.033-fold higher probability of undergoing an unplanned Caesarean section (95% CI=1.002 to 1.065). Furthermore, prenatal stress was a significant variable that can be used to predict unplanned Caesarean deliveries.

KW - Pregnant women

KW - Sleep quality

KW - Stress

KW - Unplanned Caesarean section

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945488185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945488185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ijn.12267

DO - 10.1111/ijn.12267

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 454

EP - 461

JO - International Journal of Nursing Practice

JF - International Journal of Nursing Practice

SN - 1322-7114

IS - 5

ER -