Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (percutaneous vasectomy) - A comparative study against the standard no-scalpel vasectomy

Kuan Chou Chen, Chiung Chi Peng, Hsiu Mei Hsieh, Han-Sun Chiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (SMNSV; percutaneous vasectomy) technique was reported to simplify the standard no-scalpel vasectomy (SNSV) procedure. In this report, we introduce our experiences with SMNSV in comparison with the SNSV. Materials and Methods: Between July 1999 and June 2002, 417 men were prospectively randomized to be vasectomized at the Taipei Medical University Hospital: 215 acceptors underwent the SNSV and the remaining 202 received the SMNSV. Using the no-scalpel vasectomy instruments in a percutaneous fashion, the sharp no-scalpel hemostat punctures the skin directly instead of fixating the vas to the skin with the use of a ring clamp, as done in SNSV. The vas is then grasped with the ringed instrument instead of piercing the vas and performing the supination maneuver, as described for SNSV. The intraoperative conditions of each group were recorded. The postoperative pain and life conditions were self-reported. The pain level was assessed using a 10-cm visual analogue scale under various situations. Results: The time required for the SMNSV technique was less than that for the SNSV technique (p.05 for all items). Conclusions: The simply modified vasectomy technique simplifies the SNSV technique. It combines the minimally invasive nature of SNSV with the simplicity of classical vasectomy while conserving many comparable advantages.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-156
Number of pages4
JournalContraception
Volume71
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2005

Fingerprint

Vasectomy
Supination
Skin
Postoperative Pain
Visual Analog Scale
Punctures

Keywords

  • Percutaneous vasectomy
  • Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (SMNSV)
  • Standard no-scalpel vasectomy (SNSV)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (percutaneous vasectomy) - A comparative study against the standard no-scalpel vasectomy. / Chen, Kuan Chou; Peng, Chiung Chi; Hsieh, Hsiu Mei; Chiang, Han-Sun.

In: Contraception, Vol. 71, No. 2, 02.2005, p. 153-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e25db2eed7bc4380a17baff0a2bbf452,
title = "Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (percutaneous vasectomy) - A comparative study against the standard no-scalpel vasectomy",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: The simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (SMNSV; percutaneous vasectomy) technique was reported to simplify the standard no-scalpel vasectomy (SNSV) procedure. In this report, we introduce our experiences with SMNSV in comparison with the SNSV. Materials and Methods: Between July 1999 and June 2002, 417 men were prospectively randomized to be vasectomized at the Taipei Medical University Hospital: 215 acceptors underwent the SNSV and the remaining 202 received the SMNSV. Using the no-scalpel vasectomy instruments in a percutaneous fashion, the sharp no-scalpel hemostat punctures the skin directly instead of fixating the vas to the skin with the use of a ring clamp, as done in SNSV. The vas is then grasped with the ringed instrument instead of piercing the vas and performing the supination maneuver, as described for SNSV. The intraoperative conditions of each group were recorded. The postoperative pain and life conditions were self-reported. The pain level was assessed using a 10-cm visual analogue scale under various situations. Results: The time required for the SMNSV technique was less than that for the SNSV technique (p.05 for all items). Conclusions: The simply modified vasectomy technique simplifies the SNSV technique. It combines the minimally invasive nature of SNSV with the simplicity of classical vasectomy while conserving many comparable advantages.",
keywords = "Percutaneous vasectomy, Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (SMNSV), Standard no-scalpel vasectomy (SNSV)",
author = "Chen, {Kuan Chou} and Peng, {Chiung Chi} and Hsieh, {Hsiu Mei} and Han-Sun Chiang",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2004.07.018",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "153--156",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (percutaneous vasectomy) - A comparative study against the standard no-scalpel vasectomy

AU - Chen, Kuan Chou

AU - Peng, Chiung Chi

AU - Hsieh, Hsiu Mei

AU - Chiang, Han-Sun

PY - 2005/2

Y1 - 2005/2

N2 - Background and Purpose: The simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (SMNSV; percutaneous vasectomy) technique was reported to simplify the standard no-scalpel vasectomy (SNSV) procedure. In this report, we introduce our experiences with SMNSV in comparison with the SNSV. Materials and Methods: Between July 1999 and June 2002, 417 men were prospectively randomized to be vasectomized at the Taipei Medical University Hospital: 215 acceptors underwent the SNSV and the remaining 202 received the SMNSV. Using the no-scalpel vasectomy instruments in a percutaneous fashion, the sharp no-scalpel hemostat punctures the skin directly instead of fixating the vas to the skin with the use of a ring clamp, as done in SNSV. The vas is then grasped with the ringed instrument instead of piercing the vas and performing the supination maneuver, as described for SNSV. The intraoperative conditions of each group were recorded. The postoperative pain and life conditions were self-reported. The pain level was assessed using a 10-cm visual analogue scale under various situations. Results: The time required for the SMNSV technique was less than that for the SNSV technique (p.05 for all items). Conclusions: The simply modified vasectomy technique simplifies the SNSV technique. It combines the minimally invasive nature of SNSV with the simplicity of classical vasectomy while conserving many comparable advantages.

AB - Background and Purpose: The simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (SMNSV; percutaneous vasectomy) technique was reported to simplify the standard no-scalpel vasectomy (SNSV) procedure. In this report, we introduce our experiences with SMNSV in comparison with the SNSV. Materials and Methods: Between July 1999 and June 2002, 417 men were prospectively randomized to be vasectomized at the Taipei Medical University Hospital: 215 acceptors underwent the SNSV and the remaining 202 received the SMNSV. Using the no-scalpel vasectomy instruments in a percutaneous fashion, the sharp no-scalpel hemostat punctures the skin directly instead of fixating the vas to the skin with the use of a ring clamp, as done in SNSV. The vas is then grasped with the ringed instrument instead of piercing the vas and performing the supination maneuver, as described for SNSV. The intraoperative conditions of each group were recorded. The postoperative pain and life conditions were self-reported. The pain level was assessed using a 10-cm visual analogue scale under various situations. Results: The time required for the SMNSV technique was less than that for the SNSV technique (p.05 for all items). Conclusions: The simply modified vasectomy technique simplifies the SNSV technique. It combines the minimally invasive nature of SNSV with the simplicity of classical vasectomy while conserving many comparable advantages.

KW - Percutaneous vasectomy

KW - Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (SMNSV)

KW - Standard no-scalpel vasectomy (SNSV)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13544273342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13544273342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.07.018

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.07.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 15707567

AN - SCOPUS:13544273342

VL - 71

SP - 153

EP - 156

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 2

ER -