Sex differences in how erotic and painful stimuli impair inhibitory control

Jiaxin Yu; Daisy L. Hung; Philip Tseng; Ovid J L Tzeng; Neil G. Muggleton; Chi Hung Juan

doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.007

Sex differences in how erotic and painful stimuli impair inhibitory control

Jiaxin Yu, Daisy L. Hung, Philip Tseng, Ovid J L Tzeng, Neil G. Muggleton, Chi Hung Juan

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Witnessing emotional events such as arousal or pain may impair ongoing cognitive processes such as inhibitory control. We found that this may be true only half of the time. Erotic images and painful video clips were shown to men and women shortly before a stop signal task, which measures cognitive inhibitory control. These stimuli impaired inhibitory control only in men and not in women, suggesting that emotional stimuli may be processed with different weights depending on gender.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	251-255
Number of pages	5
Journal	Cognition
Volume	124
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.007
Publication status	Published - Aug 2012
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Emotion
Response inhibition
Sex difference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Linguistics and Language
Cognitive Neuroscience
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Language and Linguistics
Developmental and Educational Psychology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.007

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences in how erotic and painful stimuli impair inhibitory control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{8ef2d108545b4f438cdb7708d142ef50,

title = "Sex differences in how erotic and painful stimuli impair inhibitory control",

abstract = "Witnessing emotional events such as arousal or pain may impair ongoing cognitive processes such as inhibitory control. We found that this may be true only half of the time. Erotic images and painful video clips were shown to men and women shortly before a stop signal task, which measures cognitive inhibitory control. These stimuli impaired inhibitory control only in men and not in women, suggesting that emotional stimuli may be processed with different weights depending on gender.",

keywords = "Emotion, Response inhibition, Sex difference",

author = "Jiaxin Yu and Hung, {Daisy L.} and Philip Tseng and Tzeng, {Ovid J L} and Muggleton, {Neil G.} and Juan, {Chi Hung}",

year = "2012",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.007",

language = "English",

volume = "124",

pages = "251--255",

journal = "Cognition",

issn = "0010-0277",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in how erotic and painful stimuli impair inhibitory control

AU - Yu, Jiaxin

AU - Hung, Daisy L.

AU - Tseng, Philip

AU - Tzeng, Ovid J L

AU - Muggleton, Neil G.

AU - Juan, Chi Hung

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Witnessing emotional events such as arousal or pain may impair ongoing cognitive processes such as inhibitory control. We found that this may be true only half of the time. Erotic images and painful video clips were shown to men and women shortly before a stop signal task, which measures cognitive inhibitory control. These stimuli impaired inhibitory control only in men and not in women, suggesting that emotional stimuli may be processed with different weights depending on gender.

AB - Witnessing emotional events such as arousal or pain may impair ongoing cognitive processes such as inhibitory control. We found that this may be true only half of the time. Erotic images and painful video clips were shown to men and women shortly before a stop signal task, which measures cognitive inhibitory control. These stimuli impaired inhibitory control only in men and not in women, suggesting that emotional stimuli may be processed with different weights depending on gender.

KW - Emotion

KW - Response inhibition

KW - Sex difference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862664868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862664868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.007

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 22658947

AN - SCOPUS:84862664868

VL - 124

SP - 251

EP - 255

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 2

ER -