Sensory axonal dysfunction in asymptomatic diabetic patients

Jia-Ying Sung, Yi-Chen Lin, Siao-yu Lin, Matthew C. Kiernan, Cindy S.-Y. Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Diabetic patients typically complain of sensory symptoms more than motor weakness, raising the question whether diabetes has selective effects on sensory axons. The present study was undertaken to dissect and evaluate the development of diabetic neuropathy (DN) with the hypothesis that changes occur in sensory prior to motor axons. Methods The cohort of 63 type II diabetic patients underwent standard nerve conduction studies and nerve excitability techniques were undertaken in sensory and motor axons, together with HbA1C estimate and Total Neuropathy Score (TNS). Patients were further grouped based on TNS into Grade 0 (G0; TNS 0–1, n = 24), Grade 1 (G1; TNS 2–8, n = 28) and Grade 2 (G2; TNS 9–24, n = 11). Results Compared to age-matched controls, G0 asymptomatic diabetic patients had significant higher in threshold (p < 0.001) and reduction in threshold electrotonus (TE) TEd (10–20) ms (p < 0.05) in the motor recordings (Sung et al., 2012). However, in the same G0 group, their sensory axons demonstrated significant increases in threshold, prolongation in latency, down-shifting of recovery cycle (RC) increased superexcitability, reduction in late subexcitability, and increase TEd (10–20) ms (p < 0.001), indicating greater sensory axonal changes in comparison to motor. In addition, sensory excitability parameters became progressively more abnormal with increasing TNS, with further changes in RC (increased superexcitability, decreased subexcitability p < 0.01) and in TE (TEd (10–20) ms, TEh (10–20) ms, p < 0.01) as their disease progressed. When comparing G0 versus G1 the significant differences were prolonged latency and greater refractoriness in G2 (p < 0.001), while further significant changes developed in depolarizing TE (TEd (90–100) ms), S2 accommodation, P < 0.001) between G1 and G2 groups. Conclusion Taken in total, these preliminary findings suggest sensory excitability abnormalities progress with the development of diabetes, prior to motor involvement at early disease stages. Furthermore, progressive axonal dysfunctions from nodal to internodal areas evolved as the disease severity increased. These abnormalities are evidence that early changes may be detected by nerve excitability parameters, prior to clinical evidence of neuropathy and “electrodiagnostic” changes. These studies have in addition revealed progressive changes across a spectrum of sensory excitability parameters. As such, sensory excitability testing may provide an effective biomarker to provide insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms producing axonal dysfunction in patients with DN where preventative strategies can take place.
Original languageTraditional Chinese
Pages (from-to)e5-e6
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume125
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

Sensory axonal dysfunction in asymptomatic diabetic patients. / Sung, Jia-Ying; Lin, Yi-Chen; Lin, Siao-yu; Kiernan, Matthew C.; Lin, Cindy S.-Y.

In: Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 125, No. 4, 2014, p. e5-e6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sung, Jia-Ying ; Lin, Yi-Chen ; Lin, Siao-yu ; Kiernan, Matthew C. ; Lin, Cindy S.-Y. / Sensory axonal dysfunction in asymptomatic diabetic patients. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. 2014 ; Vol. 125, No. 4. pp. e5-e6.
@article{bb111bb6922545509ae1b44d12f17fdf,
title = "Sensory axonal dysfunction in asymptomatic diabetic patients",
abstract = "Background Diabetic patients typically complain of sensory symptoms more than motor weakness, raising the question whether diabetes has selective effects on sensory axons. The present study was undertaken to dissect and evaluate the development of diabetic neuropathy (DN) with the hypothesis that changes occur in sensory prior to motor axons. Methods The cohort of 63 type II diabetic patients underwent standard nerve conduction studies and nerve excitability techniques were undertaken in sensory and motor axons, together with HbA1C estimate and Total Neuropathy Score (TNS). Patients were further grouped based on TNS into Grade 0 (G0; TNS 0–1, n = 24), Grade 1 (G1; TNS 2–8, n = 28) and Grade 2 (G2; TNS 9–24, n = 11). Results Compared to age-matched controls, G0 asymptomatic diabetic patients had significant higher in threshold (p < 0.001) and reduction in threshold electrotonus (TE) TEd (10–20) ms (p < 0.05) in the motor recordings (Sung et al., 2012). However, in the same G0 group, their sensory axons demonstrated significant increases in threshold, prolongation in latency, down-shifting of recovery cycle (RC) increased superexcitability, reduction in late subexcitability, and increase TEd (10–20) ms (p < 0.001), indicating greater sensory axonal changes in comparison to motor. In addition, sensory excitability parameters became progressively more abnormal with increasing TNS, with further changes in RC (increased superexcitability, decreased subexcitability p < 0.01) and in TE (TEd (10–20) ms, TEh (10–20) ms, p < 0.01) as their disease progressed. When comparing G0 versus G1 the significant differences were prolonged latency and greater refractoriness in G2 (p < 0.001), while further significant changes developed in depolarizing TE (TEd (90–100) ms), S2 accommodation, P < 0.001) between G1 and G2 groups. Conclusion Taken in total, these preliminary findings suggest sensory excitability abnormalities progress with the development of diabetes, prior to motor involvement at early disease stages. Furthermore, progressive axonal dysfunctions from nodal to internodal areas evolved as the disease severity increased. These abnormalities are evidence that early changes may be detected by nerve excitability parameters, prior to clinical evidence of neuropathy and “electrodiagnostic” changes. These studies have in addition revealed progressive changes across a spectrum of sensory excitability parameters. As such, sensory excitability testing may provide an effective biomarker to provide insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms producing axonal dysfunction in patients with DN where preventative strategies can take place.",
author = "Jia-Ying Sung and Yi-Chen Lin and Siao-yu Lin and Kiernan, {Matthew C.} and Lin, {Cindy S.-Y.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinph.2013.10.036",
language = "繁體中文",
volume = "125",
pages = "e5--e6",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "1388-2457",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensory axonal dysfunction in asymptomatic diabetic patients

AU - Sung, Jia-Ying

AU - Lin, Yi-Chen

AU - Lin, Siao-yu

AU - Kiernan, Matthew C.

AU - Lin, Cindy S.-Y.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background Diabetic patients typically complain of sensory symptoms more than motor weakness, raising the question whether diabetes has selective effects on sensory axons. The present study was undertaken to dissect and evaluate the development of diabetic neuropathy (DN) with the hypothesis that changes occur in sensory prior to motor axons. Methods The cohort of 63 type II diabetic patients underwent standard nerve conduction studies and nerve excitability techniques were undertaken in sensory and motor axons, together with HbA1C estimate and Total Neuropathy Score (TNS). Patients were further grouped based on TNS into Grade 0 (G0; TNS 0–1, n = 24), Grade 1 (G1; TNS 2–8, n = 28) and Grade 2 (G2; TNS 9–24, n = 11). Results Compared to age-matched controls, G0 asymptomatic diabetic patients had significant higher in threshold (p < 0.001) and reduction in threshold electrotonus (TE) TEd (10–20) ms (p < 0.05) in the motor recordings (Sung et al., 2012). However, in the same G0 group, their sensory axons demonstrated significant increases in threshold, prolongation in latency, down-shifting of recovery cycle (RC) increased superexcitability, reduction in late subexcitability, and increase TEd (10–20) ms (p < 0.001), indicating greater sensory axonal changes in comparison to motor. In addition, sensory excitability parameters became progressively more abnormal with increasing TNS, with further changes in RC (increased superexcitability, decreased subexcitability p < 0.01) and in TE (TEd (10–20) ms, TEh (10–20) ms, p < 0.01) as their disease progressed. When comparing G0 versus G1 the significant differences were prolonged latency and greater refractoriness in G2 (p < 0.001), while further significant changes developed in depolarizing TE (TEd (90–100) ms), S2 accommodation, P < 0.001) between G1 and G2 groups. Conclusion Taken in total, these preliminary findings suggest sensory excitability abnormalities progress with the development of diabetes, prior to motor involvement at early disease stages. Furthermore, progressive axonal dysfunctions from nodal to internodal areas evolved as the disease severity increased. These abnormalities are evidence that early changes may be detected by nerve excitability parameters, prior to clinical evidence of neuropathy and “electrodiagnostic” changes. These studies have in addition revealed progressive changes across a spectrum of sensory excitability parameters. As such, sensory excitability testing may provide an effective biomarker to provide insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms producing axonal dysfunction in patients with DN where preventative strategies can take place.

AB - Background Diabetic patients typically complain of sensory symptoms more than motor weakness, raising the question whether diabetes has selective effects on sensory axons. The present study was undertaken to dissect and evaluate the development of diabetic neuropathy (DN) with the hypothesis that changes occur in sensory prior to motor axons. Methods The cohort of 63 type II diabetic patients underwent standard nerve conduction studies and nerve excitability techniques were undertaken in sensory and motor axons, together with HbA1C estimate and Total Neuropathy Score (TNS). Patients were further grouped based on TNS into Grade 0 (G0; TNS 0–1, n = 24), Grade 1 (G1; TNS 2–8, n = 28) and Grade 2 (G2; TNS 9–24, n = 11). Results Compared to age-matched controls, G0 asymptomatic diabetic patients had significant higher in threshold (p < 0.001) and reduction in threshold electrotonus (TE) TEd (10–20) ms (p < 0.05) in the motor recordings (Sung et al., 2012). However, in the same G0 group, their sensory axons demonstrated significant increases in threshold, prolongation in latency, down-shifting of recovery cycle (RC) increased superexcitability, reduction in late subexcitability, and increase TEd (10–20) ms (p < 0.001), indicating greater sensory axonal changes in comparison to motor. In addition, sensory excitability parameters became progressively more abnormal with increasing TNS, with further changes in RC (increased superexcitability, decreased subexcitability p < 0.01) and in TE (TEd (10–20) ms, TEh (10–20) ms, p < 0.01) as their disease progressed. When comparing G0 versus G1 the significant differences were prolonged latency and greater refractoriness in G2 (p < 0.001), while further significant changes developed in depolarizing TE (TEd (90–100) ms), S2 accommodation, P < 0.001) between G1 and G2 groups. Conclusion Taken in total, these preliminary findings suggest sensory excitability abnormalities progress with the development of diabetes, prior to motor involvement at early disease stages. Furthermore, progressive axonal dysfunctions from nodal to internodal areas evolved as the disease severity increased. These abnormalities are evidence that early changes may be detected by nerve excitability parameters, prior to clinical evidence of neuropathy and “electrodiagnostic” changes. These studies have in addition revealed progressive changes across a spectrum of sensory excitability parameters. As such, sensory excitability testing may provide an effective biomarker to provide insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms producing axonal dysfunction in patients with DN where preventative strategies can take place.

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.10.036

DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.10.036

M3 - 文章

VL - 125

SP - e5-e6

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 1388-2457

IS - 4

ER -