Screening for high-grade carotid stenosis using a portable ultrasonography instrument

Ulf Schminke, Lillian Motsch, Li Ming Lien, Teng Yeow Tan, M. Gene Bond, James F. Toole, Charles H. Tegeler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose. We investigated the diagnostic performance of a brief Power Doppler Imaging (PDI) screening examination for carotid artery stenoses using a newly developed portable instrument. Methods. A highly experienced sonographer screened in total 152 carotid arteries by either continuous wave (cw) Doppler (n = 50) or a lightweight (2.4 kg) portable duplex device (n = 102) in a prospective study of 76 high-risk patients. The screening protocols included either spectrum analysis and frequency shift measurement in both internal carotid arteries with cw-Doppler or determination of area and diameter ratios in transverse and longitudinal views of both carotid arteries in B-mode and with PDI, but without velocity measurement. Both protocols were evaluated against a complete routine duplex ultrasonography examination. Results. According to the complete examination, stenoses were 75%, A z values (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) were 0.897 for area ratios, 0.843 for diameter ratios (PDI protocol) and 1.0 for the cw-Doppler protocol. Conclusions. The diagnostic performance of the cw-Doppler protocol was superior to the PDI protocol. Nevertheless, both protocols appear suitable as inexpensive screening strategies to identify subjects with >75% stenosis measured by carotid Doppler ultrasound. However, these preliminary data need further verification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)252-259
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neuroimaging
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Carotid Stenosis
Carotid Arteries
Ultrasonography
Doppler Ultrasonography
Internal Carotid Artery
ROC Curve
Spectrum Analysis
Pathologic Constriction
Prospective Studies
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Carotid artery stenosis
  • Power Doppler imaging
  • Screening
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Screening for high-grade carotid stenosis using a portable ultrasonography instrument. / Schminke, Ulf; Motsch, Lillian; Lien, Li Ming; Tan, Teng Yeow; Bond, M. Gene; Toole, James F.; Tegeler, Charles H.

In: Journal of Neuroimaging, Vol. 16, No. 3, 07.2006, p. 252-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schminke, Ulf ; Motsch, Lillian ; Lien, Li Ming ; Tan, Teng Yeow ; Bond, M. Gene ; Toole, James F. ; Tegeler, Charles H. / Screening for high-grade carotid stenosis using a portable ultrasonography instrument. In: Journal of Neuroimaging. 2006 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 252-259.
@article{e0d8edb6b30f4ce38b77428ce47f3574,
title = "Screening for high-grade carotid stenosis using a portable ultrasonography instrument",
abstract = "Background and Purpose. We investigated the diagnostic performance of a brief Power Doppler Imaging (PDI) screening examination for carotid artery stenoses using a newly developed portable instrument. Methods. A highly experienced sonographer screened in total 152 carotid arteries by either continuous wave (cw) Doppler (n = 50) or a lightweight (2.4 kg) portable duplex device (n = 102) in a prospective study of 76 high-risk patients. The screening protocols included either spectrum analysis and frequency shift measurement in both internal carotid arteries with cw-Doppler or determination of area and diameter ratios in transverse and longitudinal views of both carotid arteries in B-mode and with PDI, but without velocity measurement. Both protocols were evaluated against a complete routine duplex ultrasonography examination. Results. According to the complete examination, stenoses were 75{\%}, A z values (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) were 0.897 for area ratios, 0.843 for diameter ratios (PDI protocol) and 1.0 for the cw-Doppler protocol. Conclusions. The diagnostic performance of the cw-Doppler protocol was superior to the PDI protocol. Nevertheless, both protocols appear suitable as inexpensive screening strategies to identify subjects with >75{\%} stenosis measured by carotid Doppler ultrasound. However, these preliminary data need further verification.",
keywords = "Carotid artery stenosis, Power Doppler imaging, Screening, Ultrasonography",
author = "Ulf Schminke and Lillian Motsch and Lien, {Li Ming} and Tan, {Teng Yeow} and Bond, {M. Gene} and Toole, {James F.} and Tegeler, {Charles H.}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1552-6569.2006.00044.x",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "252--259",
journal = "Journal of Neuroimaging",
issn = "1051-2284",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening for high-grade carotid stenosis using a portable ultrasonography instrument

AU - Schminke, Ulf

AU - Motsch, Lillian

AU - Lien, Li Ming

AU - Tan, Teng Yeow

AU - Bond, M. Gene

AU - Toole, James F.

AU - Tegeler, Charles H.

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - Background and Purpose. We investigated the diagnostic performance of a brief Power Doppler Imaging (PDI) screening examination for carotid artery stenoses using a newly developed portable instrument. Methods. A highly experienced sonographer screened in total 152 carotid arteries by either continuous wave (cw) Doppler (n = 50) or a lightweight (2.4 kg) portable duplex device (n = 102) in a prospective study of 76 high-risk patients. The screening protocols included either spectrum analysis and frequency shift measurement in both internal carotid arteries with cw-Doppler or determination of area and diameter ratios in transverse and longitudinal views of both carotid arteries in B-mode and with PDI, but without velocity measurement. Both protocols were evaluated against a complete routine duplex ultrasonography examination. Results. According to the complete examination, stenoses were 75%, A z values (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) were 0.897 for area ratios, 0.843 for diameter ratios (PDI protocol) and 1.0 for the cw-Doppler protocol. Conclusions. The diagnostic performance of the cw-Doppler protocol was superior to the PDI protocol. Nevertheless, both protocols appear suitable as inexpensive screening strategies to identify subjects with >75% stenosis measured by carotid Doppler ultrasound. However, these preliminary data need further verification.

AB - Background and Purpose. We investigated the diagnostic performance of a brief Power Doppler Imaging (PDI) screening examination for carotid artery stenoses using a newly developed portable instrument. Methods. A highly experienced sonographer screened in total 152 carotid arteries by either continuous wave (cw) Doppler (n = 50) or a lightweight (2.4 kg) portable duplex device (n = 102) in a prospective study of 76 high-risk patients. The screening protocols included either spectrum analysis and frequency shift measurement in both internal carotid arteries with cw-Doppler or determination of area and diameter ratios in transverse and longitudinal views of both carotid arteries in B-mode and with PDI, but without velocity measurement. Both protocols were evaluated against a complete routine duplex ultrasonography examination. Results. According to the complete examination, stenoses were 75%, A z values (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) were 0.897 for area ratios, 0.843 for diameter ratios (PDI protocol) and 1.0 for the cw-Doppler protocol. Conclusions. The diagnostic performance of the cw-Doppler protocol was superior to the PDI protocol. Nevertheless, both protocols appear suitable as inexpensive screening strategies to identify subjects with >75% stenosis measured by carotid Doppler ultrasound. However, these preliminary data need further verification.

KW - Carotid artery stenosis

KW - Power Doppler imaging

KW - Screening

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748456588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748456588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2006.00044.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2006.00044.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16808827

AN - SCOPUS:33748456588

VL - 16

SP - 252

EP - 259

JO - Journal of Neuroimaging

JF - Journal of Neuroimaging

SN - 1051-2284

IS - 3

ER -