Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Variable Corneal Compensation in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma

Catherine Jui ling Liu, Ching Yu Cheng, Wen-Ming Hsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of scanning laser polarimetry in primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) as compared with that in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and to compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) distribution between PACG and POAG. Design: Prospective, comparative, observational cases series. Participants: One eye each of 58 PACG patients and 51 POAG patients. Methods: Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation (GDx VCC). Main Outcome Measures: GDx VCC temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal (TSNIT) parameters, including TSNIT average, TSNIT standard deviation, superior average, and inferior average, as well as the nerve fiber indicator (NFI). Results: By using a logistic marginal regression model that defined an abnormal test as P<5% for each of the TSNIT parameters or NFI ≥ 31, we found that diagnostic sensitivities of the GDx VCC parameters were similar (all Ps>0.05) in PACG and POAG despite the differences in refraction error (P = 0.017), axial length (P<0.001), and disc diameters (vertical, P = 0.031; horizontal, P = 0.002) between these 2 forms of glaucoma. The between-group similarity in the diagnostic sensitivity remained true either when all eyes were considered together or in each severity group, based on the visual field scoring system adopted by the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Regarding the RNFL distribution, the parameter inferior average was greater than the superior average in either PACG (P = 0.010) or POAG (P = 0.006). Further subgroup analyses found significant superior-inferior asymmetry in mild PACG (P = 0.022) but not in mild POAG (P = 0.279). Conclusions: Eyes with PACG have ocular biometrics and, possibly, pathogeneses of optic nerve damage different from those of eyes with POAG; however, the diagnostic sensitivity of GDx VCC is quite comparable in these 2 forms of glaucoma, irrespective of disease severity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1334-1339
Number of pages6
JournalOphthalmology
Volume115
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Scanning Laser Polarimetry
Angle Closure Glaucoma
Nerve Fibers
Nose
Glaucoma
Optic Nerve
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Visual Fields
Logistic Models
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Variable Corneal Compensation in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma. / Liu, Catherine Jui ling; Cheng, Ching Yu; Hsu, Wen-Ming.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 115, No. 8, 01.08.2008, p. 1334-1339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liu, Catherine Jui ling ; Cheng, Ching Yu ; Hsu, Wen-Ming. / Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Variable Corneal Compensation in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma. In: Ophthalmology. 2008 ; Vol. 115, No. 8. pp. 1334-1339.
@article{55f389b950874788b1979dc54120d789,
title = "Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Variable Corneal Compensation in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of scanning laser polarimetry in primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) as compared with that in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and to compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) distribution between PACG and POAG. Design: Prospective, comparative, observational cases series. Participants: One eye each of 58 PACG patients and 51 POAG patients. Methods: Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation (GDx VCC). Main Outcome Measures: GDx VCC temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal (TSNIT) parameters, including TSNIT average, TSNIT standard deviation, superior average, and inferior average, as well as the nerve fiber indicator (NFI). Results: By using a logistic marginal regression model that defined an abnormal test as P<5{\%} for each of the TSNIT parameters or NFI ≥ 31, we found that diagnostic sensitivities of the GDx VCC parameters were similar (all Ps>0.05) in PACG and POAG despite the differences in refraction error (P = 0.017), axial length (P<0.001), and disc diameters (vertical, P = 0.031; horizontal, P = 0.002) between these 2 forms of glaucoma. The between-group similarity in the diagnostic sensitivity remained true either when all eyes were considered together or in each severity group, based on the visual field scoring system adopted by the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Regarding the RNFL distribution, the parameter inferior average was greater than the superior average in either PACG (P = 0.010) or POAG (P = 0.006). Further subgroup analyses found significant superior-inferior asymmetry in mild PACG (P = 0.022) but not in mild POAG (P = 0.279). Conclusions: Eyes with PACG have ocular biometrics and, possibly, pathogeneses of optic nerve damage different from those of eyes with POAG; however, the diagnostic sensitivity of GDx VCC is quite comparable in these 2 forms of glaucoma, irrespective of disease severity.",
author = "Liu, {Catherine Jui ling} and Cheng, {Ching Yu} and Wen-Ming Hsu",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.042",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "1334--1339",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Variable Corneal Compensation in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma

AU - Liu, Catherine Jui ling

AU - Cheng, Ching Yu

AU - Hsu, Wen-Ming

PY - 2008/8/1

Y1 - 2008/8/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of scanning laser polarimetry in primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) as compared with that in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and to compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) distribution between PACG and POAG. Design: Prospective, comparative, observational cases series. Participants: One eye each of 58 PACG patients and 51 POAG patients. Methods: Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation (GDx VCC). Main Outcome Measures: GDx VCC temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal (TSNIT) parameters, including TSNIT average, TSNIT standard deviation, superior average, and inferior average, as well as the nerve fiber indicator (NFI). Results: By using a logistic marginal regression model that defined an abnormal test as P<5% for each of the TSNIT parameters or NFI ≥ 31, we found that diagnostic sensitivities of the GDx VCC parameters were similar (all Ps>0.05) in PACG and POAG despite the differences in refraction error (P = 0.017), axial length (P<0.001), and disc diameters (vertical, P = 0.031; horizontal, P = 0.002) between these 2 forms of glaucoma. The between-group similarity in the diagnostic sensitivity remained true either when all eyes were considered together or in each severity group, based on the visual field scoring system adopted by the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Regarding the RNFL distribution, the parameter inferior average was greater than the superior average in either PACG (P = 0.010) or POAG (P = 0.006). Further subgroup analyses found significant superior-inferior asymmetry in mild PACG (P = 0.022) but not in mild POAG (P = 0.279). Conclusions: Eyes with PACG have ocular biometrics and, possibly, pathogeneses of optic nerve damage different from those of eyes with POAG; however, the diagnostic sensitivity of GDx VCC is quite comparable in these 2 forms of glaucoma, irrespective of disease severity.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of scanning laser polarimetry in primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) as compared with that in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and to compare the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) distribution between PACG and POAG. Design: Prospective, comparative, observational cases series. Participants: One eye each of 58 PACG patients and 51 POAG patients. Methods: Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation (GDx VCC). Main Outcome Measures: GDx VCC temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal (TSNIT) parameters, including TSNIT average, TSNIT standard deviation, superior average, and inferior average, as well as the nerve fiber indicator (NFI). Results: By using a logistic marginal regression model that defined an abnormal test as P<5% for each of the TSNIT parameters or NFI ≥ 31, we found that diagnostic sensitivities of the GDx VCC parameters were similar (all Ps>0.05) in PACG and POAG despite the differences in refraction error (P = 0.017), axial length (P<0.001), and disc diameters (vertical, P = 0.031; horizontal, P = 0.002) between these 2 forms of glaucoma. The between-group similarity in the diagnostic sensitivity remained true either when all eyes were considered together or in each severity group, based on the visual field scoring system adopted by the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Regarding the RNFL distribution, the parameter inferior average was greater than the superior average in either PACG (P = 0.010) or POAG (P = 0.006). Further subgroup analyses found significant superior-inferior asymmetry in mild PACG (P = 0.022) but not in mild POAG (P = 0.279). Conclusions: Eyes with PACG have ocular biometrics and, possibly, pathogeneses of optic nerve damage different from those of eyes with POAG; however, the diagnostic sensitivity of GDx VCC is quite comparable in these 2 forms of glaucoma, irrespective of disease severity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48149098190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48149098190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.042

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.042

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 1334

EP - 1339

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 8

ER -