Scale descriptor selection for Taiwan-version of questionnaire of World Health Organization quality of life

M. R. Lin, K. P G Yao, J. S. Hwang, J. D. Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study is to select appropriate descriptors for Taiwan-version of World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL) Methods: WHOQOL consists of four kinds of response scales: capacity, frequency, intensity, and evaluation. Each response scale has five ordinal descriptors including two anchors at extreme levels and three intermediates. We invited experts to decide the two anchors for extreme levels, and then selected 156 outpatients and healthy persons from 10 hospitals in Taiwan to place each descriptor on a 10 centimeter line according to where they think each descriptor ties in relation to the two anchors. Results: Five most appropriate Chinese descriptors were 'Completely not', 'A little', 'Moderately', 'Very' and 'Completely' for capacity; 'Never', 'Seldom', 'Half', 'Very often' and 'Always' for frequency; 'Completely not', 'Slightly', 'Moderately', 'Very much' and 'Extremely' for intensity; and 'Extremely dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', 'Moderately satisfied', 'Satisfied' and 'Extremely satisfied' for evaluation. Test-retest reliability was moderate on the average but varied among descriptors. However, there were no differences between their mean values of test and retest. Conclusions: These selected descriptors are suitable for Taiwan-version of WHOQOL and other use of health profile assessment of quality of life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)262-270
Number of pages9
JournalChinese Journal of Public Health
Volume18
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Taiwan
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Outpatients
Surveys and Questionnaires
Health

Keywords

  • Quality of life
  • Scale descriptor
  • World Health Organization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Scale descriptor selection for Taiwan-version of questionnaire of World Health Organization quality of life. / Lin, M. R.; Yao, K. P G; Hwang, J. S.; Wang, J. D.

In: Chinese Journal of Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1999, p. 262-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a662d22a2b5e4fd395b687bc0a33c89e,
title = "Scale descriptor selection for Taiwan-version of questionnaire of World Health Organization quality of life",
abstract = "Objectives: This study is to select appropriate descriptors for Taiwan-version of World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL) Methods: WHOQOL consists of four kinds of response scales: capacity, frequency, intensity, and evaluation. Each response scale has five ordinal descriptors including two anchors at extreme levels and three intermediates. We invited experts to decide the two anchors for extreme levels, and then selected 156 outpatients and healthy persons from 10 hospitals in Taiwan to place each descriptor on a 10 centimeter line according to where they think each descriptor ties in relation to the two anchors. Results: Five most appropriate Chinese descriptors were 'Completely not', 'A little', 'Moderately', 'Very' and 'Completely' for capacity; 'Never', 'Seldom', 'Half', 'Very often' and 'Always' for frequency; 'Completely not', 'Slightly', 'Moderately', 'Very much' and 'Extremely' for intensity; and 'Extremely dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', 'Moderately satisfied', 'Satisfied' and 'Extremely satisfied' for evaluation. Test-retest reliability was moderate on the average but varied among descriptors. However, there were no differences between their mean values of test and retest. Conclusions: These selected descriptors are suitable for Taiwan-version of WHOQOL and other use of health profile assessment of quality of life.",
keywords = "Quality of life, Scale descriptor, World Health Organization",
author = "Lin, {M. R.} and Yao, {K. P G} and Hwang, {J. S.} and Wang, {J. D.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "262--270",
journal = "台灣公共衛生雜誌",
issn = "1023-2141",
publisher = "臺灣公共衛生學會",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scale descriptor selection for Taiwan-version of questionnaire of World Health Organization quality of life

AU - Lin, M. R.

AU - Yao, K. P G

AU - Hwang, J. S.

AU - Wang, J. D.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Objectives: This study is to select appropriate descriptors for Taiwan-version of World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL) Methods: WHOQOL consists of four kinds of response scales: capacity, frequency, intensity, and evaluation. Each response scale has five ordinal descriptors including two anchors at extreme levels and three intermediates. We invited experts to decide the two anchors for extreme levels, and then selected 156 outpatients and healthy persons from 10 hospitals in Taiwan to place each descriptor on a 10 centimeter line according to where they think each descriptor ties in relation to the two anchors. Results: Five most appropriate Chinese descriptors were 'Completely not', 'A little', 'Moderately', 'Very' and 'Completely' for capacity; 'Never', 'Seldom', 'Half', 'Very often' and 'Always' for frequency; 'Completely not', 'Slightly', 'Moderately', 'Very much' and 'Extremely' for intensity; and 'Extremely dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', 'Moderately satisfied', 'Satisfied' and 'Extremely satisfied' for evaluation. Test-retest reliability was moderate on the average but varied among descriptors. However, there were no differences between their mean values of test and retest. Conclusions: These selected descriptors are suitable for Taiwan-version of WHOQOL and other use of health profile assessment of quality of life.

AB - Objectives: This study is to select appropriate descriptors for Taiwan-version of World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL) Methods: WHOQOL consists of four kinds of response scales: capacity, frequency, intensity, and evaluation. Each response scale has five ordinal descriptors including two anchors at extreme levels and three intermediates. We invited experts to decide the two anchors for extreme levels, and then selected 156 outpatients and healthy persons from 10 hospitals in Taiwan to place each descriptor on a 10 centimeter line according to where they think each descriptor ties in relation to the two anchors. Results: Five most appropriate Chinese descriptors were 'Completely not', 'A little', 'Moderately', 'Very' and 'Completely' for capacity; 'Never', 'Seldom', 'Half', 'Very often' and 'Always' for frequency; 'Completely not', 'Slightly', 'Moderately', 'Very much' and 'Extremely' for intensity; and 'Extremely dissatisfied', 'Dissatisfied', 'Moderately satisfied', 'Satisfied' and 'Extremely satisfied' for evaluation. Test-retest reliability was moderate on the average but varied among descriptors. However, there were no differences between their mean values of test and retest. Conclusions: These selected descriptors are suitable for Taiwan-version of WHOQOL and other use of health profile assessment of quality of life.

KW - Quality of life

KW - Scale descriptor

KW - World Health Organization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032736584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032736584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 262

EP - 270

JO - 台灣公共衛生雜誌

JF - 台灣公共衛生雜誌

SN - 1023-2141

IS - 4

ER -