Risk factors and management of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Cheng Chia Tsou, Su Shin Lo, Wen Liang Fang, Chew N. Wu, Jen Hao Chen, Mao Chih Hsieh, King Han Shen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: Radical gastrectomy remains the primary treatment for gastric cancer without distant metastasis. However, anastomotic leakage and extended lymph node dissection might cause additional morbidity and related mortality. Methodology: From January 1988 to December 2004, 2076 patients with gastric cancer underwent radical gastrectomy at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. The risk factors for anastomotic leakage, including clinicopathological factors, operative procedures, combined organ resection, operating time, blood loss, and associated disease, were analyzed. The various methods used to measure anastomotic leakage and the clinical courses of different sites of anastomotic leakage were compared. Results: The overall complication rate was 18.7% and the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 2.7% (n=57). The anastomotic leakage-related mortality rate was 21.1% (n=12). Older age (≥65 years), longer operating time, more blood loss, and co-morbidities were the precipitating factors. Adequate drainage was the treatment approach used for anastomotic leakage. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was reduced during the later period of the study (3.4% vs 1.8%). Conclusion: Only in an institute with a well-established training program and high volume of gastric cancer patients can we improve the surgical skills and accumulate the experiences with management of anastomotic leakage that make radical gastrectomy safer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)218-223
Number of pages6
JournalHepato-Gastroenterology
Volume58
Issue number105
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Anastomotic Leak
Risk Management
Gastrectomy
Stomach Neoplasms
Morbidity
Veterans Hospitals
Precipitating Factors
Mortality
Incidence
Operative Surgical Procedures
Lymph Node Excision
General Hospitals
Drainage
Neoplasm Metastasis
Education

Keywords

  • Anastomotic leakage
  • Management
  • Radical gastrectomy
  • Risk factor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology

Cite this

Tsou, C. C., Lo, S. S., Fang, W. L., Wu, C. N., Chen, J. H., Hsieh, M. C., & Shen, K. H. (2011). Risk factors and management of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterology, 58(105), 218-223.

Risk factors and management of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. / Tsou, Cheng Chia; Lo, Su Shin; Fang, Wen Liang; Wu, Chew N.; Chen, Jen Hao; Hsieh, Mao Chih; Shen, King Han.

In: Hepato-Gastroenterology, Vol. 58, No. 105, 01.2011, p. 218-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tsou, CC, Lo, SS, Fang, WL, Wu, CN, Chen, JH, Hsieh, MC & Shen, KH 2011, 'Risk factors and management of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer', Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 58, no. 105, pp. 218-223.
Tsou, Cheng Chia ; Lo, Su Shin ; Fang, Wen Liang ; Wu, Chew N. ; Chen, Jen Hao ; Hsieh, Mao Chih ; Shen, King Han. / Risk factors and management of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. In: Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2011 ; Vol. 58, No. 105. pp. 218-223.
@article{e88af20aa2eb462d8a89d2f604a795ab,
title = "Risk factors and management of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer",
abstract = "Background/Aims: Radical gastrectomy remains the primary treatment for gastric cancer without distant metastasis. However, anastomotic leakage and extended lymph node dissection might cause additional morbidity and related mortality. Methodology: From January 1988 to December 2004, 2076 patients with gastric cancer underwent radical gastrectomy at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. The risk factors for anastomotic leakage, including clinicopathological factors, operative procedures, combined organ resection, operating time, blood loss, and associated disease, were analyzed. The various methods used to measure anastomotic leakage and the clinical courses of different sites of anastomotic leakage were compared. Results: The overall complication rate was 18.7{\%} and the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 2.7{\%} (n=57). The anastomotic leakage-related mortality rate was 21.1{\%} (n=12). Older age (≥65 years), longer operating time, more blood loss, and co-morbidities were the precipitating factors. Adequate drainage was the treatment approach used for anastomotic leakage. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was reduced during the later period of the study (3.4{\%} vs 1.8{\%}). Conclusion: Only in an institute with a well-established training program and high volume of gastric cancer patients can we improve the surgical skills and accumulate the experiences with management of anastomotic leakage that make radical gastrectomy safer.",
keywords = "Anastomotic leakage, Management, Radical gastrectomy, Risk factor",
author = "Tsou, {Cheng Chia} and Lo, {Su Shin} and Fang, {Wen Liang} and Wu, {Chew N.} and Chen, {Jen Hao} and Hsieh, {Mao Chih} and Shen, {King Han}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "218--223",
journal = "Acta hepato-splenologica",
issn = "0172-6390",
publisher = "H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing Ltd.",
number = "105",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk factors and management of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer

AU - Tsou, Cheng Chia

AU - Lo, Su Shin

AU - Fang, Wen Liang

AU - Wu, Chew N.

AU - Chen, Jen Hao

AU - Hsieh, Mao Chih

AU - Shen, King Han

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Background/Aims: Radical gastrectomy remains the primary treatment for gastric cancer without distant metastasis. However, anastomotic leakage and extended lymph node dissection might cause additional morbidity and related mortality. Methodology: From January 1988 to December 2004, 2076 patients with gastric cancer underwent radical gastrectomy at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. The risk factors for anastomotic leakage, including clinicopathological factors, operative procedures, combined organ resection, operating time, blood loss, and associated disease, were analyzed. The various methods used to measure anastomotic leakage and the clinical courses of different sites of anastomotic leakage were compared. Results: The overall complication rate was 18.7% and the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 2.7% (n=57). The anastomotic leakage-related mortality rate was 21.1% (n=12). Older age (≥65 years), longer operating time, more blood loss, and co-morbidities were the precipitating factors. Adequate drainage was the treatment approach used for anastomotic leakage. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was reduced during the later period of the study (3.4% vs 1.8%). Conclusion: Only in an institute with a well-established training program and high volume of gastric cancer patients can we improve the surgical skills and accumulate the experiences with management of anastomotic leakage that make radical gastrectomy safer.

AB - Background/Aims: Radical gastrectomy remains the primary treatment for gastric cancer without distant metastasis. However, anastomotic leakage and extended lymph node dissection might cause additional morbidity and related mortality. Methodology: From January 1988 to December 2004, 2076 patients with gastric cancer underwent radical gastrectomy at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. The risk factors for anastomotic leakage, including clinicopathological factors, operative procedures, combined organ resection, operating time, blood loss, and associated disease, were analyzed. The various methods used to measure anastomotic leakage and the clinical courses of different sites of anastomotic leakage were compared. Results: The overall complication rate was 18.7% and the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 2.7% (n=57). The anastomotic leakage-related mortality rate was 21.1% (n=12). Older age (≥65 years), longer operating time, more blood loss, and co-morbidities were the precipitating factors. Adequate drainage was the treatment approach used for anastomotic leakage. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was reduced during the later period of the study (3.4% vs 1.8%). Conclusion: Only in an institute with a well-established training program and high volume of gastric cancer patients can we improve the surgical skills and accumulate the experiences with management of anastomotic leakage that make radical gastrectomy safer.

KW - Anastomotic leakage

KW - Management

KW - Radical gastrectomy

KW - Risk factor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955015662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955015662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21510318

AN - SCOPUS:79955015662

VL - 58

SP - 218

EP - 223

JO - Acta hepato-splenologica

JF - Acta hepato-splenologica

SN - 0172-6390

IS - 105

ER -