Retroperitoneal laparostomy

An effective treatment of extensive intractable retroperitoneal abscess after blunt duodenal trauma

Jen Feng Fang, Ray Jade Chen, Being Chuan Lin, Yu Bau Hsu, Jung Liang Kao, Yi Chin Kao, Miin Fu Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Delay in surgical treatment and duodenal wound dehiscence are two major causes of extensive retroperitoneal abscess formation after blunt duodenal injury. This complication is traditionally treated with primary repair of the duodenal wound and drainage of the abscess through anterior laparotomy. Pyloric exclusion is sometimes added as an adjunctive procedure. The anterior approach, however, may result in inadequate drainage, and repeat surgery is sometimes needed. We reviewed our experiences and evaluated the effectiveness of retroperitoneal laparostomy for the treatment of retroperitoneal abscess with continuous soiling. Methods: There were 52 blunt duodenal injuries during a 7-year period. Eleven patients developed extensive retroperitoneal abscesses. Results: All 11 patients were treated with anterior laparotomy initially. Five patients recovered after this procedure. Six patients continued to have retroperitoneal abscesses and were under septic status. Two patients received another anterior drainage, and had recurrent abscesses later. Retroperitoneal laparostomy was performed for these six patients. After retroperitoneal laparostomy, daily wound care, and antibiotic treatment, all six patients recovered. Only two patients developed incisional hernia. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal laparostomy is effective in treating extensive intractable retroperitoneal abscess after blunt duodenal injury. Patients with the complications of duodenal leak and extensive retroperitoneal abscess should be treated with pyloric exclusion and drainage through anterior laparotomy first. If the duodenal wound does not heal after pyloric exclusion and retroperitoneal abscess persists, retroperitoneal laparostomy should be performed without further attempt to repair the wound.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)652-655
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume46
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Abscess
Wounds and Injuries
Nonpenetrating Wounds
Drainage
Laparotomy
Therapeutics
Reoperation
Anti-Bacterial Agents

Keywords

  • Duodenal injury
  • Retroperitoneal abscess
  • Retroperitoneal laparostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Retroperitoneal laparostomy : An effective treatment of extensive intractable retroperitoneal abscess after blunt duodenal trauma. / Fang, Jen Feng; Chen, Ray Jade; Lin, Being Chuan; Hsu, Yu Bau; Kao, Jung Liang; Kao, Yi Chin; Chen, Miin Fu.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 46, No. 4, 04.1999, p. 652-655.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fang, Jen Feng ; Chen, Ray Jade ; Lin, Being Chuan ; Hsu, Yu Bau ; Kao, Jung Liang ; Kao, Yi Chin ; Chen, Miin Fu. / Retroperitoneal laparostomy : An effective treatment of extensive intractable retroperitoneal abscess after blunt duodenal trauma. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1999 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 652-655.
@article{14e54ecb1abc454fa6fc0761b657bc72,
title = "Retroperitoneal laparostomy: An effective treatment of extensive intractable retroperitoneal abscess after blunt duodenal trauma",
abstract = "Background: Delay in surgical treatment and duodenal wound dehiscence are two major causes of extensive retroperitoneal abscess formation after blunt duodenal injury. This complication is traditionally treated with primary repair of the duodenal wound and drainage of the abscess through anterior laparotomy. Pyloric exclusion is sometimes added as an adjunctive procedure. The anterior approach, however, may result in inadequate drainage, and repeat surgery is sometimes needed. We reviewed our experiences and evaluated the effectiveness of retroperitoneal laparostomy for the treatment of retroperitoneal abscess with continuous soiling. Methods: There were 52 blunt duodenal injuries during a 7-year period. Eleven patients developed extensive retroperitoneal abscesses. Results: All 11 patients were treated with anterior laparotomy initially. Five patients recovered after this procedure. Six patients continued to have retroperitoneal abscesses and were under septic status. Two patients received another anterior drainage, and had recurrent abscesses later. Retroperitoneal laparostomy was performed for these six patients. After retroperitoneal laparostomy, daily wound care, and antibiotic treatment, all six patients recovered. Only two patients developed incisional hernia. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal laparostomy is effective in treating extensive intractable retroperitoneal abscess after blunt duodenal injury. Patients with the complications of duodenal leak and extensive retroperitoneal abscess should be treated with pyloric exclusion and drainage through anterior laparotomy first. If the duodenal wound does not heal after pyloric exclusion and retroperitoneal abscess persists, retroperitoneal laparostomy should be performed without further attempt to repair the wound.",
keywords = "Duodenal injury, Retroperitoneal abscess, Retroperitoneal laparostomy",
author = "Fang, {Jen Feng} and Chen, {Ray Jade} and Lin, {Being Chuan} and Hsu, {Yu Bau} and Kao, {Jung Liang} and Kao, {Yi Chin} and Chen, {Miin Fu}",
year = "1999",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "652--655",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retroperitoneal laparostomy

T2 - An effective treatment of extensive intractable retroperitoneal abscess after blunt duodenal trauma

AU - Fang, Jen Feng

AU - Chen, Ray Jade

AU - Lin, Being Chuan

AU - Hsu, Yu Bau

AU - Kao, Jung Liang

AU - Kao, Yi Chin

AU - Chen, Miin Fu

PY - 1999/4

Y1 - 1999/4

N2 - Background: Delay in surgical treatment and duodenal wound dehiscence are two major causes of extensive retroperitoneal abscess formation after blunt duodenal injury. This complication is traditionally treated with primary repair of the duodenal wound and drainage of the abscess through anterior laparotomy. Pyloric exclusion is sometimes added as an adjunctive procedure. The anterior approach, however, may result in inadequate drainage, and repeat surgery is sometimes needed. We reviewed our experiences and evaluated the effectiveness of retroperitoneal laparostomy for the treatment of retroperitoneal abscess with continuous soiling. Methods: There were 52 blunt duodenal injuries during a 7-year period. Eleven patients developed extensive retroperitoneal abscesses. Results: All 11 patients were treated with anterior laparotomy initially. Five patients recovered after this procedure. Six patients continued to have retroperitoneal abscesses and were under septic status. Two patients received another anterior drainage, and had recurrent abscesses later. Retroperitoneal laparostomy was performed for these six patients. After retroperitoneal laparostomy, daily wound care, and antibiotic treatment, all six patients recovered. Only two patients developed incisional hernia. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal laparostomy is effective in treating extensive intractable retroperitoneal abscess after blunt duodenal injury. Patients with the complications of duodenal leak and extensive retroperitoneal abscess should be treated with pyloric exclusion and drainage through anterior laparotomy first. If the duodenal wound does not heal after pyloric exclusion and retroperitoneal abscess persists, retroperitoneal laparostomy should be performed without further attempt to repair the wound.

AB - Background: Delay in surgical treatment and duodenal wound dehiscence are two major causes of extensive retroperitoneal abscess formation after blunt duodenal injury. This complication is traditionally treated with primary repair of the duodenal wound and drainage of the abscess through anterior laparotomy. Pyloric exclusion is sometimes added as an adjunctive procedure. The anterior approach, however, may result in inadequate drainage, and repeat surgery is sometimes needed. We reviewed our experiences and evaluated the effectiveness of retroperitoneal laparostomy for the treatment of retroperitoneal abscess with continuous soiling. Methods: There were 52 blunt duodenal injuries during a 7-year period. Eleven patients developed extensive retroperitoneal abscesses. Results: All 11 patients were treated with anterior laparotomy initially. Five patients recovered after this procedure. Six patients continued to have retroperitoneal abscesses and were under septic status. Two patients received another anterior drainage, and had recurrent abscesses later. Retroperitoneal laparostomy was performed for these six patients. After retroperitoneal laparostomy, daily wound care, and antibiotic treatment, all six patients recovered. Only two patients developed incisional hernia. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal laparostomy is effective in treating extensive intractable retroperitoneal abscess after blunt duodenal injury. Patients with the complications of duodenal leak and extensive retroperitoneal abscess should be treated with pyloric exclusion and drainage through anterior laparotomy first. If the duodenal wound does not heal after pyloric exclusion and retroperitoneal abscess persists, retroperitoneal laparostomy should be performed without further attempt to repair the wound.

KW - Duodenal injury

KW - Retroperitoneal abscess

KW - Retroperitoneal laparostomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032944352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032944352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 652

EP - 655

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 4

ER -