Abstract
We tested the responsiveness of the modified Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) for patients with low back pain (LBP) and sciatica and made a comparison with the modified Roland-Morris Disability Scale for sciatica (RMS-L) and self-reported pain intensity measured by visual analogue scale (VAS).One hundred and forty-eight participants were recruited from 2 university hospitals. The evaluation included demographic data, LBP history, and the modified LEFS, RMS-L, and VAS, with a follow-up one month later. Several responsiveness statistics were calculated.The study followed 132 participants, approximately 25% reported improvement. Guyatt responsiveness index (GRI) was 0.8 or higher for 3 measures, while standardized response means were 0.8 or higher for the RMS-L and VAS, but only 0.6 for the modified LEFS among improved group. According to ROC analysis, the modified LEFS had an area under curve (AUC) similar to that of the modified RMS-L, but significantly smaller than that of the VAS.The responsiveness of the modified LEFS was moderate but not superior to the VAS or RMS-L. Although, the modified LEFS could not replace the RMS-L or VAS, it could still be used as a complementary measure since these three measurements covered different body function, activity and participation domains.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e15105 |
| Journal | Medicine |
| Volume | 98 |
| Issue number | 14 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 1 2019 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Adult
- Disability Evaluation
- Female
- Humans
- Low Back Pain/diagnosis
- Lower Extremity/physiopathology
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Pain Measurement/standards
- ROC Curve
- Sciatica/diagnosis
- Self Report
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Visual Analog Scale
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
Cite this
Responsiveness of the modified lower extremity functional scale in patients with low back pain and sciatica : A comparison with pain intensity and the modified Roland-Morris Disability Scale. / Horng, Yi Shiung; Hou, Wen Hsuan; Liang, Huey Wen.
In: Medicine, Vol. 98, No. 14, e15105, 01.04.2019.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Responsiveness of the modified lower extremity functional scale in patients with low back pain and sciatica
T2 - A comparison with pain intensity and the modified Roland-Morris Disability Scale
AU - Horng, Yi Shiung
AU - Hou, Wen Hsuan
AU - Liang, Huey Wen
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - We tested the responsiveness of the modified Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) for patients with low back pain (LBP) and sciatica and made a comparison with the modified Roland-Morris Disability Scale for sciatica (RMS-L) and self-reported pain intensity measured by visual analogue scale (VAS).One hundred and forty-eight participants were recruited from 2 university hospitals. The evaluation included demographic data, LBP history, and the modified LEFS, RMS-L, and VAS, with a follow-up one month later. Several responsiveness statistics were calculated.The study followed 132 participants, approximately 25% reported improvement. Guyatt responsiveness index (GRI) was 0.8 or higher for 3 measures, while standardized response means were 0.8 or higher for the RMS-L and VAS, but only 0.6 for the modified LEFS among improved group. According to ROC analysis, the modified LEFS had an area under curve (AUC) similar to that of the modified RMS-L, but significantly smaller than that of the VAS.The responsiveness of the modified LEFS was moderate but not superior to the VAS or RMS-L. Although, the modified LEFS could not replace the RMS-L or VAS, it could still be used as a complementary measure since these three measurements covered different body function, activity and participation domains.
AB - We tested the responsiveness of the modified Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) for patients with low back pain (LBP) and sciatica and made a comparison with the modified Roland-Morris Disability Scale for sciatica (RMS-L) and self-reported pain intensity measured by visual analogue scale (VAS).One hundred and forty-eight participants were recruited from 2 university hospitals. The evaluation included demographic data, LBP history, and the modified LEFS, RMS-L, and VAS, with a follow-up one month later. Several responsiveness statistics were calculated.The study followed 132 participants, approximately 25% reported improvement. Guyatt responsiveness index (GRI) was 0.8 or higher for 3 measures, while standardized response means were 0.8 or higher for the RMS-L and VAS, but only 0.6 for the modified LEFS among improved group. According to ROC analysis, the modified LEFS had an area under curve (AUC) similar to that of the modified RMS-L, but significantly smaller than that of the VAS.The responsiveness of the modified LEFS was moderate but not superior to the VAS or RMS-L. Although, the modified LEFS could not replace the RMS-L or VAS, it could still be used as a complementary measure since these three measurements covered different body function, activity and participation domains.
KW - Adult
KW - Disability Evaluation
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Low Back Pain/diagnosis
KW - Lower Extremity/physiopathology
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Pain Measurement/standards
KW - ROC Curve
KW - Sciatica/diagnosis
KW - Self Report
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Visual Analog Scale
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064239968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064239968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MD.0000000000015105
DO - 10.1097/MD.0000000000015105
M3 - Article
C2 - 30946376
AN - SCOPUS:85064239968
VL - 98
JO - Medicine; analytical reviews of general medicine, neurology, psychiatry, dermatology, and pediatries
JF - Medicine; analytical reviews of general medicine, neurology, psychiatry, dermatology, and pediatries
SN - 0025-7974
IS - 14
M1 - e15105
ER -