Respiratory symptoms among municipal waste workers in the Gambia: Types of solid waste and working conditions

Buba Darboe, Meei Ying Kao, Duujian Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluated the prevalence of major respiratory symptoms (RS) among waste workers in Kanifing, a major metropolis in the Gambia, and assessed the relationship between work-related factors and the prevalence of specific RS. Here 116 waste workers were recruited to participate in the study, dividing the participants into three groups according to job function: refuse collectors, field supervisors, and drivers. A slightly modified version of the British Medical Research Council's questionnaire on RS was used to interview participants. Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (version 18.0).The prevalence of RS in the three groups of waste workers was as follows: 22.2% of field supervisors reported persistent cough, as did 36.4% of drivers, and 83.8% of refuse collectors. Phlegm production was 44.4% among field supervisors, 81.8% among drivers, and 83.8% among refuse collectors. Among field supervisors, 11.1% reported having shortness of breath; the figure for drivers was 30.3%, and for refuse collectors, it was 40.5%. The prevalence of wheezing was 11.1% among field supervisors, 21.2% among drivers, and 27.0% among refuse collectors. Post hoc Scheffe analysis revealed a significant mean difference in the prevalence of persistent cough among refuse collectors compared with field supervisors and drivers (p <0.05). Multiple regression analysis shows that factors such as exposure to dust, nonuse of respiratory protective devices, history of asthma, and contact with waste are all significant predictors of the prevalence of RS (p <0.05). A majority of waste workers experienced RS. Prevalence was higher among refuse collectors compared with field supervisors and drivers. Specific work-related factors significantly affected RS in waste workers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-27
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Health Promotion and Education
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2 2015

Fingerprint

Gambia
Solid Waste
Cough
Respiratory Protective Devices
Social Sciences
Respiratory Sounds
Dust
Dyspnea
Biomedical Research
Software
Asthma
Cross-Sectional Studies
Regression Analysis
Interviews

Keywords

  • exposure
  • respiratory symptoms
  • types of solid waste
  • waste workers
  • work-related factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Respiratory symptoms among municipal waste workers in the Gambia : Types of solid waste and working conditions. / Darboe, Buba; Kao, Meei Ying; Tsai, Duujian.

In: International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, Vol. 53, No. 1, 02.01.2015, p. 17-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8e9efb00e3ae44f5801eba3bde141d4c,
title = "Respiratory symptoms among municipal waste workers in the Gambia: Types of solid waste and working conditions",
abstract = "This study evaluated the prevalence of major respiratory symptoms (RS) among waste workers in Kanifing, a major metropolis in the Gambia, and assessed the relationship between work-related factors and the prevalence of specific RS. Here 116 waste workers were recruited to participate in the study, dividing the participants into three groups according to job function: refuse collectors, field supervisors, and drivers. A slightly modified version of the British Medical Research Council's questionnaire on RS was used to interview participants. Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (version 18.0).The prevalence of RS in the three groups of waste workers was as follows: 22.2{\%} of field supervisors reported persistent cough, as did 36.4{\%} of drivers, and 83.8{\%} of refuse collectors. Phlegm production was 44.4{\%} among field supervisors, 81.8{\%} among drivers, and 83.8{\%} among refuse collectors. Among field supervisors, 11.1{\%} reported having shortness of breath; the figure for drivers was 30.3{\%}, and for refuse collectors, it was 40.5{\%}. The prevalence of wheezing was 11.1{\%} among field supervisors, 21.2{\%} among drivers, and 27.0{\%} among refuse collectors. Post hoc Scheffe analysis revealed a significant mean difference in the prevalence of persistent cough among refuse collectors compared with field supervisors and drivers (p <0.05). Multiple regression analysis shows that factors such as exposure to dust, nonuse of respiratory protective devices, history of asthma, and contact with waste are all significant predictors of the prevalence of RS (p <0.05). A majority of waste workers experienced RS. Prevalence was higher among refuse collectors compared with field supervisors and drivers. Specific work-related factors significantly affected RS in waste workers.",
keywords = "exposure, respiratory symptoms, types of solid waste, waste workers, work-related factors",
author = "Buba Darboe and Kao, {Meei Ying} and Duujian Tsai",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14635240.2014.923284",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "17--27",
journal = "International Journal of Health Promotion and Education",
issn = "1463-5240",
publisher = "Institute of Health Promotion and Education",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Respiratory symptoms among municipal waste workers in the Gambia

T2 - Types of solid waste and working conditions

AU - Darboe, Buba

AU - Kao, Meei Ying

AU - Tsai, Duujian

PY - 2015/1/2

Y1 - 2015/1/2

N2 - This study evaluated the prevalence of major respiratory symptoms (RS) among waste workers in Kanifing, a major metropolis in the Gambia, and assessed the relationship between work-related factors and the prevalence of specific RS. Here 116 waste workers were recruited to participate in the study, dividing the participants into three groups according to job function: refuse collectors, field supervisors, and drivers. A slightly modified version of the British Medical Research Council's questionnaire on RS was used to interview participants. Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (version 18.0).The prevalence of RS in the three groups of waste workers was as follows: 22.2% of field supervisors reported persistent cough, as did 36.4% of drivers, and 83.8% of refuse collectors. Phlegm production was 44.4% among field supervisors, 81.8% among drivers, and 83.8% among refuse collectors. Among field supervisors, 11.1% reported having shortness of breath; the figure for drivers was 30.3%, and for refuse collectors, it was 40.5%. The prevalence of wheezing was 11.1% among field supervisors, 21.2% among drivers, and 27.0% among refuse collectors. Post hoc Scheffe analysis revealed a significant mean difference in the prevalence of persistent cough among refuse collectors compared with field supervisors and drivers (p <0.05). Multiple regression analysis shows that factors such as exposure to dust, nonuse of respiratory protective devices, history of asthma, and contact with waste are all significant predictors of the prevalence of RS (p <0.05). A majority of waste workers experienced RS. Prevalence was higher among refuse collectors compared with field supervisors and drivers. Specific work-related factors significantly affected RS in waste workers.

AB - This study evaluated the prevalence of major respiratory symptoms (RS) among waste workers in Kanifing, a major metropolis in the Gambia, and assessed the relationship between work-related factors and the prevalence of specific RS. Here 116 waste workers were recruited to participate in the study, dividing the participants into three groups according to job function: refuse collectors, field supervisors, and drivers. A slightly modified version of the British Medical Research Council's questionnaire on RS was used to interview participants. Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (version 18.0).The prevalence of RS in the three groups of waste workers was as follows: 22.2% of field supervisors reported persistent cough, as did 36.4% of drivers, and 83.8% of refuse collectors. Phlegm production was 44.4% among field supervisors, 81.8% among drivers, and 83.8% among refuse collectors. Among field supervisors, 11.1% reported having shortness of breath; the figure for drivers was 30.3%, and for refuse collectors, it was 40.5%. The prevalence of wheezing was 11.1% among field supervisors, 21.2% among drivers, and 27.0% among refuse collectors. Post hoc Scheffe analysis revealed a significant mean difference in the prevalence of persistent cough among refuse collectors compared with field supervisors and drivers (p <0.05). Multiple regression analysis shows that factors such as exposure to dust, nonuse of respiratory protective devices, history of asthma, and contact with waste are all significant predictors of the prevalence of RS (p <0.05). A majority of waste workers experienced RS. Prevalence was higher among refuse collectors compared with field supervisors and drivers. Specific work-related factors significantly affected RS in waste workers.

KW - exposure

KW - respiratory symptoms

KW - types of solid waste

KW - waste workers

KW - work-related factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919336932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919336932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14635240.2014.923284

DO - 10.1080/14635240.2014.923284

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84919336932

VL - 53

SP - 17

EP - 27

JO - International Journal of Health Promotion and Education

JF - International Journal of Health Promotion and Education

SN - 1463-5240

IS - 1

ER -