Residual cell content in plasma produced by three centrifugal apheresis procedures

Thierry Burnouf, Claudia Kappelsberger, Kerstin Frank, Thomas Burkhardt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the impact of collection procedures on the residual amount of blood cells in plasma for transfusion and for fractionation is of current interest. This prospective work evaluated plasma donations collected on an apheresis machine (PCS 2, Haemonetics) with three different automatic centrifugal apheresis procedures, currently largely used in the US (Revision G) and in Europe (Revision F), and included a new procedure that uses a high-separation core (HSC) that is designed with a second separation chamber to further separate cells from plasma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 90 collection procedures have been performed from a population of 37 donors, under comprehensively standardized conditions. There were 30 well-matched donors in each group. Plasma aliquots were taken from the plasma units within 30 minutes of the end of the collection procedures and immediately assessed for WBCs, RBCs, PLTs, and supernatant Hb. RESULTS: In Revision F and Revision G plasma donations, the mean numbers of WBCs were 83.1 × 104 and 311 × 104 per L; PLTs, 5.01 × 109 and 20 × 109 per L; and RBCs, 58 × 109 and 43 × 10 9 per L, respectively. Significantly lower values were found with the HSC procedure (mean WBC, RBC, and PLT counts, 3.01 × 104/L [p <0.05], 9 × 106/L [p <0.001], and 3.5 × 109/L [p <0.001], respectively). The amount of free Hb was similar in all three procedures. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in numbers of cells in plasma were found depending on the centrifugal procedures used and the design of the separation bowl. The lowest level of cell contamination was found with the new HSC bowl, which without a filtration step, yielded plasma that met the standard for WBC-reduced plasma. Plasma collectors can select the most appropriate method of plasma collection based on donor criteria, use of plasma (transfusion, viral inactivation, or fractionation), and local or international regulations, when in place.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1522-1526
Number of pages5
JournalTransfusion
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Blood Component Removal
Plasma Cells
Virus Inactivation
Blood Cells
Cell Count

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology
  • Hematology

Cite this

Residual cell content in plasma produced by three centrifugal apheresis procedures. / Burnouf, Thierry; Kappelsberger, Claudia; Frank, Kerstin; Burkhardt, Thomas.

In: Transfusion, Vol. 43, No. 11, 11.2003, p. 1522-1526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burnouf, Thierry ; Kappelsberger, Claudia ; Frank, Kerstin ; Burkhardt, Thomas. / Residual cell content in plasma produced by three centrifugal apheresis procedures. In: Transfusion. 2003 ; Vol. 43, No. 11. pp. 1522-1526.
@article{f39841ed6c8b405787d531dc09abdc7f,
title = "Residual cell content in plasma produced by three centrifugal apheresis procedures",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Understanding the impact of collection procedures on the residual amount of blood cells in plasma for transfusion and for fractionation is of current interest. This prospective work evaluated plasma donations collected on an apheresis machine (PCS 2, Haemonetics) with three different automatic centrifugal apheresis procedures, currently largely used in the US (Revision G) and in Europe (Revision F), and included a new procedure that uses a high-separation core (HSC) that is designed with a second separation chamber to further separate cells from plasma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 90 collection procedures have been performed from a population of 37 donors, under comprehensively standardized conditions. There were 30 well-matched donors in each group. Plasma aliquots were taken from the plasma units within 30 minutes of the end of the collection procedures and immediately assessed for WBCs, RBCs, PLTs, and supernatant Hb. RESULTS: In Revision F and Revision G plasma donations, the mean numbers of WBCs were 83.1 × 104 and 311 × 104 per L; PLTs, 5.01 × 109 and 20 × 109 per L; and RBCs, 58 × 109 and 43 × 10 9 per L, respectively. Significantly lower values were found with the HSC procedure (mean WBC, RBC, and PLT counts, 3.01 × 104/L [p <0.05], 9 × 106/L [p <0.001], and 3.5 × 109/L [p <0.001], respectively). The amount of free Hb was similar in all three procedures. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in numbers of cells in plasma were found depending on the centrifugal procedures used and the design of the separation bowl. The lowest level of cell contamination was found with the new HSC bowl, which without a filtration step, yielded plasma that met the standard for WBC-reduced plasma. Plasma collectors can select the most appropriate method of plasma collection based on donor criteria, use of plasma (transfusion, viral inactivation, or fractionation), and local or international regulations, when in place.",
author = "Thierry Burnouf and Claudia Kappelsberger and Kerstin Frank and Thomas Burkhardt",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00543.x",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1522--1526",
journal = "Transfusion",
issn = "0041-1132",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Residual cell content in plasma produced by three centrifugal apheresis procedures

AU - Burnouf, Thierry

AU - Kappelsberger, Claudia

AU - Frank, Kerstin

AU - Burkhardt, Thomas

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: Understanding the impact of collection procedures on the residual amount of blood cells in plasma for transfusion and for fractionation is of current interest. This prospective work evaluated plasma donations collected on an apheresis machine (PCS 2, Haemonetics) with three different automatic centrifugal apheresis procedures, currently largely used in the US (Revision G) and in Europe (Revision F), and included a new procedure that uses a high-separation core (HSC) that is designed with a second separation chamber to further separate cells from plasma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 90 collection procedures have been performed from a population of 37 donors, under comprehensively standardized conditions. There were 30 well-matched donors in each group. Plasma aliquots were taken from the plasma units within 30 minutes of the end of the collection procedures and immediately assessed for WBCs, RBCs, PLTs, and supernatant Hb. RESULTS: In Revision F and Revision G plasma donations, the mean numbers of WBCs were 83.1 × 104 and 311 × 104 per L; PLTs, 5.01 × 109 and 20 × 109 per L; and RBCs, 58 × 109 and 43 × 10 9 per L, respectively. Significantly lower values were found with the HSC procedure (mean WBC, RBC, and PLT counts, 3.01 × 104/L [p <0.05], 9 × 106/L [p <0.001], and 3.5 × 109/L [p <0.001], respectively). The amount of free Hb was similar in all three procedures. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in numbers of cells in plasma were found depending on the centrifugal procedures used and the design of the separation bowl. The lowest level of cell contamination was found with the new HSC bowl, which without a filtration step, yielded plasma that met the standard for WBC-reduced plasma. Plasma collectors can select the most appropriate method of plasma collection based on donor criteria, use of plasma (transfusion, viral inactivation, or fractionation), and local or international regulations, when in place.

AB - BACKGROUND: Understanding the impact of collection procedures on the residual amount of blood cells in plasma for transfusion and for fractionation is of current interest. This prospective work evaluated plasma donations collected on an apheresis machine (PCS 2, Haemonetics) with three different automatic centrifugal apheresis procedures, currently largely used in the US (Revision G) and in Europe (Revision F), and included a new procedure that uses a high-separation core (HSC) that is designed with a second separation chamber to further separate cells from plasma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 90 collection procedures have been performed from a population of 37 donors, under comprehensively standardized conditions. There were 30 well-matched donors in each group. Plasma aliquots were taken from the plasma units within 30 minutes of the end of the collection procedures and immediately assessed for WBCs, RBCs, PLTs, and supernatant Hb. RESULTS: In Revision F and Revision G plasma donations, the mean numbers of WBCs were 83.1 × 104 and 311 × 104 per L; PLTs, 5.01 × 109 and 20 × 109 per L; and RBCs, 58 × 109 and 43 × 10 9 per L, respectively. Significantly lower values were found with the HSC procedure (mean WBC, RBC, and PLT counts, 3.01 × 104/L [p <0.05], 9 × 106/L [p <0.001], and 3.5 × 109/L [p <0.001], respectively). The amount of free Hb was similar in all three procedures. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in numbers of cells in plasma were found depending on the centrifugal procedures used and the design of the separation bowl. The lowest level of cell contamination was found with the new HSC bowl, which without a filtration step, yielded plasma that met the standard for WBC-reduced plasma. Plasma collectors can select the most appropriate method of plasma collection based on donor criteria, use of plasma (transfusion, viral inactivation, or fractionation), and local or international regulations, when in place.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242440046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242440046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00543.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00543.x

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1522

EP - 1526

JO - Transfusion

JF - Transfusion

SN - 0041-1132

IS - 11

ER -