Reliability of Roentgenographic Knee Alignment Measurements in Gonarthrosis

Teng Le Huang, Chen Chie Wang, Kai Chiang Yang, Chang Chin Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A reliable method of measuring knee alignment is critical in the preoperative planning of high tibial osteotomy (HTO). This radiological study, based on the measurements of the mechanical and anatomical axes of the lower limb, aimed to determine which method would be more reliable and reproducible. From 2004 to 2013, 50 consecutive patients (50 knees) with medial gonarthrosis were treated with valgus-producing HTO. Four independent investigators assessed preoperative standing lower limb radiography (including hip, knee, and ankle joints) to measure both anatomical and mechanical axes. We defined a response as a difference in the angle measured by the same investigator using the same method. The covariates were the investigators and methods. To account for both inter- and intraobserver variabilities, all data were evaluated using a generalized estimating equation model. The results revealed that the effect of the investigators was not statistically significant; however, the effect of the measurement method was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). The estimated coefficient of the anatomical axis method was negative, indicating that the reproducibility of the anatomical axis method was better than that of the mechanical axis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)302-305
JournalJournal of Knee Surgery
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Knee
Research Personnel
Osteotomy
Lower Extremity
Observer Variation
Ankle Joint
Hip Joint
Knee Joint
Radiography

Keywords

  • anatomical axis
  • mechanical axis
  • reproducibility
  • tibial osteotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Reliability of Roentgenographic Knee Alignment Measurements in Gonarthrosis. / Huang, Teng Le; Wang, Chen Chie; Yang, Kai Chiang; Wu, Chang Chin.

In: Journal of Knee Surgery, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 302-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huang, Teng Le ; Wang, Chen Chie ; Yang, Kai Chiang ; Wu, Chang Chin. / Reliability of Roentgenographic Knee Alignment Measurements in Gonarthrosis. In: Journal of Knee Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 302-305.
@article{1a973025cf3e410d91a5a03a8676a636,
title = "Reliability of Roentgenographic Knee Alignment Measurements in Gonarthrosis",
abstract = "A reliable method of measuring knee alignment is critical in the preoperative planning of high tibial osteotomy (HTO). This radiological study, based on the measurements of the mechanical and anatomical axes of the lower limb, aimed to determine which method would be more reliable and reproducible. From 2004 to 2013, 50 consecutive patients (50 knees) with medial gonarthrosis were treated with valgus-producing HTO. Four independent investigators assessed preoperative standing lower limb radiography (including hip, knee, and ankle joints) to measure both anatomical and mechanical axes. We defined a response as a difference in the angle measured by the same investigator using the same method. The covariates were the investigators and methods. To account for both inter- and intraobserver variabilities, all data were evaluated using a generalized estimating equation model. The results revealed that the effect of the investigators was not statistically significant; however, the effect of the measurement method was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). The estimated coefficient of the anatomical axis method was negative, indicating that the reproducibility of the anatomical axis method was better than that of the mechanical axis.",
keywords = "anatomical axis, mechanical axis, reproducibility, tibial osteotomy",
author = "Huang, {Teng Le} and Wang, {Chen Chie} and Yang, {Kai Chiang} and Wu, {Chang Chin}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0037-1603638",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "302--305",
journal = "Journal of Knee Surgery",
issn = "1538-8506",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of Roentgenographic Knee Alignment Measurements in Gonarthrosis

AU - Huang, Teng Le

AU - Wang, Chen Chie

AU - Yang, Kai Chiang

AU - Wu, Chang Chin

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - A reliable method of measuring knee alignment is critical in the preoperative planning of high tibial osteotomy (HTO). This radiological study, based on the measurements of the mechanical and anatomical axes of the lower limb, aimed to determine which method would be more reliable and reproducible. From 2004 to 2013, 50 consecutive patients (50 knees) with medial gonarthrosis were treated with valgus-producing HTO. Four independent investigators assessed preoperative standing lower limb radiography (including hip, knee, and ankle joints) to measure both anatomical and mechanical axes. We defined a response as a difference in the angle measured by the same investigator using the same method. The covariates were the investigators and methods. To account for both inter- and intraobserver variabilities, all data were evaluated using a generalized estimating equation model. The results revealed that the effect of the investigators was not statistically significant; however, the effect of the measurement method was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). The estimated coefficient of the anatomical axis method was negative, indicating that the reproducibility of the anatomical axis method was better than that of the mechanical axis.

AB - A reliable method of measuring knee alignment is critical in the preoperative planning of high tibial osteotomy (HTO). This radiological study, based on the measurements of the mechanical and anatomical axes of the lower limb, aimed to determine which method would be more reliable and reproducible. From 2004 to 2013, 50 consecutive patients (50 knees) with medial gonarthrosis were treated with valgus-producing HTO. Four independent investigators assessed preoperative standing lower limb radiography (including hip, knee, and ankle joints) to measure both anatomical and mechanical axes. We defined a response as a difference in the angle measured by the same investigator using the same method. The covariates were the investigators and methods. To account for both inter- and intraobserver variabilities, all data were evaluated using a generalized estimating equation model. The results revealed that the effect of the investigators was not statistically significant; however, the effect of the measurement method was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). The estimated coefficient of the anatomical axis method was negative, indicating that the reproducibility of the anatomical axis method was better than that of the mechanical axis.

KW - anatomical axis

KW - mechanical axis

KW - reproducibility

KW - tibial osteotomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020738749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020738749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0037-1603638

DO - 10.1055/s-0037-1603638

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85020738749

VL - 31

SP - 302

EP - 305

JO - Journal of Knee Surgery

JF - Journal of Knee Surgery

SN - 1538-8506

IS - 4

ER -