Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale

Wen Hsuan Hou, Tian Shin Yeh, Huey Wen Liang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Purpose: The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a region-specific functional outcome measure designed for patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction. In this study, a Taiwan Chinese version was adapted and its validity and reliability were tested. Methods: The LEFS questionnaire was adapted and tested in 159 patients with lower extremity disorders from two university hospitals. The Cronbach α-coefficient value was calculated for internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plot, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were used for evaluating the test-retest reliability and agreement in 40 patients followed up within 7 days. Construct and convergent/divergent validity were examined by principal component analysis and correlation was examined with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Results: The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the adapted LEFS questionnaire were satisfactory [Cronbach α: 0.98; ICC(2,1), 0.97]. The Bland-Altman plot of the two tests showed a relatively consistent distribution, with limits of agreement in the range of -9.32 to 13.02. The MDC at 90% confidence interval was 9.6. One-factor model was confirmed by principal component analysis. Also, there was a moderate association between the LEFS and the physical component scores and several subscales of SF-36, but not with the mental component scores. Conclusion: The Taiwan Chinese version of the LEFS questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure of health status for patients with lower extremity disorders.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-320
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi
Volume113
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Taiwan
Reproducibility of Results
Lower Extremity
Principal Component Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health Status
Confidence Intervals
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Musculoskeletal disorders
  • Outcome measures
  • Psychometrics
  • Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale. / Hou, Wen Hsuan; Yeh, Tian Shin; Liang, Huey Wen.

In: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi, Vol. 113, No. 5, 2014, p. 313-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{440cdf8cd5344c95b32122897c724d03,
title = "Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale",
abstract = "Background/Purpose: The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a region-specific functional outcome measure designed for patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction. In this study, a Taiwan Chinese version was adapted and its validity and reliability were tested. Methods: The LEFS questionnaire was adapted and tested in 159 patients with lower extremity disorders from two university hospitals. The Cronbach α-coefficient value was calculated for internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plot, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were used for evaluating the test-retest reliability and agreement in 40 patients followed up within 7 days. Construct and convergent/divergent validity were examined by principal component analysis and correlation was examined with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Results: The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the adapted LEFS questionnaire were satisfactory [Cronbach α: 0.98; ICC(2,1), 0.97]. The Bland-Altman plot of the two tests showed a relatively consistent distribution, with limits of agreement in the range of -9.32 to 13.02. The MDC at 90{\%} confidence interval was 9.6. One-factor model was confirmed by principal component analysis. Also, there was a moderate association between the LEFS and the physical component scores and several subscales of SF-36, but not with the mental component scores. Conclusion: The Taiwan Chinese version of the LEFS questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure of health status for patients with lower extremity disorders.",
keywords = "Musculoskeletal disorders, Outcome measures, Psychometrics, Questionnaires",
author = "Hou, {Wen Hsuan} and Yeh, {Tian Shin} and Liang, {Huey Wen}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jfma.2012.07.032",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "313--320",
journal = "Journal of the Formosan Medical Association",
issn = "0929-6646",
publisher = "Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale

AU - Hou, Wen Hsuan

AU - Yeh, Tian Shin

AU - Liang, Huey Wen

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background/Purpose: The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a region-specific functional outcome measure designed for patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction. In this study, a Taiwan Chinese version was adapted and its validity and reliability were tested. Methods: The LEFS questionnaire was adapted and tested in 159 patients with lower extremity disorders from two university hospitals. The Cronbach α-coefficient value was calculated for internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plot, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were used for evaluating the test-retest reliability and agreement in 40 patients followed up within 7 days. Construct and convergent/divergent validity were examined by principal component analysis and correlation was examined with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Results: The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the adapted LEFS questionnaire were satisfactory [Cronbach α: 0.98; ICC(2,1), 0.97]. The Bland-Altman plot of the two tests showed a relatively consistent distribution, with limits of agreement in the range of -9.32 to 13.02. The MDC at 90% confidence interval was 9.6. One-factor model was confirmed by principal component analysis. Also, there was a moderate association between the LEFS and the physical component scores and several subscales of SF-36, but not with the mental component scores. Conclusion: The Taiwan Chinese version of the LEFS questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure of health status for patients with lower extremity disorders.

AB - Background/Purpose: The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a region-specific functional outcome measure designed for patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction. In this study, a Taiwan Chinese version was adapted and its validity and reliability were tested. Methods: The LEFS questionnaire was adapted and tested in 159 patients with lower extremity disorders from two university hospitals. The Cronbach α-coefficient value was calculated for internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plot, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were used for evaluating the test-retest reliability and agreement in 40 patients followed up within 7 days. Construct and convergent/divergent validity were examined by principal component analysis and correlation was examined with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Results: The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the adapted LEFS questionnaire were satisfactory [Cronbach α: 0.98; ICC(2,1), 0.97]. The Bland-Altman plot of the two tests showed a relatively consistent distribution, with limits of agreement in the range of -9.32 to 13.02. The MDC at 90% confidence interval was 9.6. One-factor model was confirmed by principal component analysis. Also, there was a moderate association between the LEFS and the physical component scores and several subscales of SF-36, but not with the mental component scores. Conclusion: The Taiwan Chinese version of the LEFS questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure of health status for patients with lower extremity disorders.

KW - Musculoskeletal disorders

KW - Outcome measures

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Questionnaires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898814634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898814634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.07.032

DO - 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.07.032

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 313

EP - 320

JO - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association

SN - 0929-6646

IS - 5

ER -