Reliability and validity of and responsiveness to the Taiwanese version of the QOLBI questionnaire

Meng Ching Chang, Wen Ta Chiu, Mau Roung Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: The suitability of the disease-specific Quality of Life of Brain Injured questionnaire (QOLBI) was determined in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: One hundred subjects with TBI aged 18 or older were recruited from 22 hospitals in northern Taiwan. The translated Taiwanese version of the 37-item QOLBI is categorized into six domains: physical, intellectual, psychological, functional, social, and personal. Results: Cronbach's α coefficients for internal consistency ranged from 0.74 to 0.97, while the interclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability were from 0.73 to 0.99. For convergent validity, Pearson's correlation coefficients comparing the QOLBI and WHOQOL-BREF in the domains of physical, psychological, social, and personal were each more than 0.4. When discriminant validity was assessed, all six QOLBI domain scores were significantly higher for subjects who returned to work compared with those who did not return to work. The Comparative Fit Index of the confirmatory factor analysis was 0.86. As the return to work was used as an external indicator to measure the responsiveness of each QOLBI domain, the effect sizes of the six QOLBI domains ranged from 0.17 to 0.56. Conclusions: Results indicate that, although there is room for improvement, QOLBI is an acceptable instrument for assessing quality of life persons with TBI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)320-329
Number of pages10
JournalTaiwan Journal of Public Health
Volume27
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Quality of Life
Brain
Return to Work
Psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Taiwan
Statistical Factor Analysis
Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Quality of life
  • Reliability
  • Responsiveness
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Reliability and validity of and responsiveness to the Taiwanese version of the QOLBI questionnaire. / Chang, Meng Ching; Chiu, Wen Ta; Lin, Mau Roung.

In: Taiwan Journal of Public Health, Vol. 27, No. 4, 08.2008, p. 320-329.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9784237294584eccae5c4b6abc85e835,
title = "Reliability and validity of and responsiveness to the Taiwanese version of the QOLBI questionnaire",
abstract = "Objectives: The suitability of the disease-specific Quality of Life of Brain Injured questionnaire (QOLBI) was determined in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: One hundred subjects with TBI aged 18 or older were recruited from 22 hospitals in northern Taiwan. The translated Taiwanese version of the 37-item QOLBI is categorized into six domains: physical, intellectual, psychological, functional, social, and personal. Results: Cronbach's α coefficients for internal consistency ranged from 0.74 to 0.97, while the interclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability were from 0.73 to 0.99. For convergent validity, Pearson's correlation coefficients comparing the QOLBI and WHOQOL-BREF in the domains of physical, psychological, social, and personal were each more than 0.4. When discriminant validity was assessed, all six QOLBI domain scores were significantly higher for subjects who returned to work compared with those who did not return to work. The Comparative Fit Index of the confirmatory factor analysis was 0.86. As the return to work was used as an external indicator to measure the responsiveness of each QOLBI domain, the effect sizes of the six QOLBI domains ranged from 0.17 to 0.56. Conclusions: Results indicate that, although there is room for improvement, QOLBI is an acceptable instrument for assessing quality of life persons with TBI.",
keywords = "Quality of life, Reliability, Responsiveness, Traumatic brain injury, Validity",
author = "Chang, {Meng Ching} and Chiu, {Wen Ta} and Lin, {Mau Roung}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "320--329",
journal = "台灣公共衛生雜誌",
issn = "1023-2141",
publisher = "臺灣公共衛生學會",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and validity of and responsiveness to the Taiwanese version of the QOLBI questionnaire

AU - Chang, Meng Ching

AU - Chiu, Wen Ta

AU - Lin, Mau Roung

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - Objectives: The suitability of the disease-specific Quality of Life of Brain Injured questionnaire (QOLBI) was determined in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: One hundred subjects with TBI aged 18 or older were recruited from 22 hospitals in northern Taiwan. The translated Taiwanese version of the 37-item QOLBI is categorized into six domains: physical, intellectual, psychological, functional, social, and personal. Results: Cronbach's α coefficients for internal consistency ranged from 0.74 to 0.97, while the interclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability were from 0.73 to 0.99. For convergent validity, Pearson's correlation coefficients comparing the QOLBI and WHOQOL-BREF in the domains of physical, psychological, social, and personal were each more than 0.4. When discriminant validity was assessed, all six QOLBI domain scores were significantly higher for subjects who returned to work compared with those who did not return to work. The Comparative Fit Index of the confirmatory factor analysis was 0.86. As the return to work was used as an external indicator to measure the responsiveness of each QOLBI domain, the effect sizes of the six QOLBI domains ranged from 0.17 to 0.56. Conclusions: Results indicate that, although there is room for improvement, QOLBI is an acceptable instrument for assessing quality of life persons with TBI.

AB - Objectives: The suitability of the disease-specific Quality of Life of Brain Injured questionnaire (QOLBI) was determined in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: One hundred subjects with TBI aged 18 or older were recruited from 22 hospitals in northern Taiwan. The translated Taiwanese version of the 37-item QOLBI is categorized into six domains: physical, intellectual, psychological, functional, social, and personal. Results: Cronbach's α coefficients for internal consistency ranged from 0.74 to 0.97, while the interclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability were from 0.73 to 0.99. For convergent validity, Pearson's correlation coefficients comparing the QOLBI and WHOQOL-BREF in the domains of physical, psychological, social, and personal were each more than 0.4. When discriminant validity was assessed, all six QOLBI domain scores were significantly higher for subjects who returned to work compared with those who did not return to work. The Comparative Fit Index of the confirmatory factor analysis was 0.86. As the return to work was used as an external indicator to measure the responsiveness of each QOLBI domain, the effect sizes of the six QOLBI domains ranged from 0.17 to 0.56. Conclusions: Results indicate that, although there is room for improvement, QOLBI is an acceptable instrument for assessing quality of life persons with TBI.

KW - Quality of life

KW - Reliability

KW - Responsiveness

KW - Traumatic brain injury

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55849087605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55849087605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 320

EP - 329

JO - 台灣公共衛生雜誌

JF - 台灣公共衛生雜誌

SN - 1023-2141

IS - 4

ER -