Reasons provided by prescribers when overriding drug-drug interaction alerts

Amy J. Grizzle, Maysaa H. Mahmood, Yu Ko, John E. Murphy, Edward P. Armstrong, Grant H. Skrepnek, William N. Jones, Gregory P. Schepers, W. Paul Nichol, Antoun Houranieh, Donna C. Dare, Christopher T. Hoey, Daniel C. Malone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate prescribers' rationales for overriding drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and to determine whether these reasons were helpful to pharmacists as a part of prescription order verification. Study Design: An observational retrospective database analysis was conducted using override reasons derived from a computerized system at 6 Veterans Affairs medical centers. Methods: Data on DDI alerts (for interactions designated as "critical" and "significant") were obtained from ambulatory care pharmacy records from July 1, 2003, to June 30, 2004. Prescribers' reasons for overriding alerts were organized into 14 categories and were then rated as clinically useful or not to the pharmacist in the assessment of potential patient harm. Results: Of 291 890 overrides identified, 72% were for critical DDIs. Across the Veterans Affairs medical centers, only 20% of the override reasons for critical DDI alerts were rated as clinically useful for order verification. Despite a mandatory override reason for critical DDI alerts, 53% of the responses were "no reason provided." The top response categories for critical and significant DDI alerts were "no reason provided," "patient has been taking combination," and "patient being monitored." Conclusions: When given the opportunity to provide a reason for overriding a DDI alert, prescribers rarely enter clinical justifications that are useful to order verification pharmacists. This brings into question how computerized physician order entry systems should be designed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)573-580
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Managed Care
Volume13
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Drug Interactions
drug
interaction
Pharmacists
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Veterans
pharmacist
Medical Order Entry Systems
Patient Harm
Ambulatory Care
Prescriptions
Databases
medication
physician

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Medicine(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Grizzle, A. J., Mahmood, M. H., Ko, Y., Murphy, J. E., Armstrong, E. P., Skrepnek, G. H., ... Malone, D. C. (2007). Reasons provided by prescribers when overriding drug-drug interaction alerts. American Journal of Managed Care, 13(10), 573-580.

Reasons provided by prescribers when overriding drug-drug interaction alerts. / Grizzle, Amy J.; Mahmood, Maysaa H.; Ko, Yu; Murphy, John E.; Armstrong, Edward P.; Skrepnek, Grant H.; Jones, William N.; Schepers, Gregory P.; Nichol, W. Paul; Houranieh, Antoun; Dare, Donna C.; Hoey, Christopher T.; Malone, Daniel C.

In: American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 13, No. 10, 10.2007, p. 573-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grizzle, AJ, Mahmood, MH, Ko, Y, Murphy, JE, Armstrong, EP, Skrepnek, GH, Jones, WN, Schepers, GP, Nichol, WP, Houranieh, A, Dare, DC, Hoey, CT & Malone, DC 2007, 'Reasons provided by prescribers when overriding drug-drug interaction alerts', American Journal of Managed Care, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 573-580.
Grizzle AJ, Mahmood MH, Ko Y, Murphy JE, Armstrong EP, Skrepnek GH et al. Reasons provided by prescribers when overriding drug-drug interaction alerts. American Journal of Managed Care. 2007 Oct;13(10):573-580.
Grizzle, Amy J. ; Mahmood, Maysaa H. ; Ko, Yu ; Murphy, John E. ; Armstrong, Edward P. ; Skrepnek, Grant H. ; Jones, William N. ; Schepers, Gregory P. ; Nichol, W. Paul ; Houranieh, Antoun ; Dare, Donna C. ; Hoey, Christopher T. ; Malone, Daniel C. / Reasons provided by prescribers when overriding drug-drug interaction alerts. In: American Journal of Managed Care. 2007 ; Vol. 13, No. 10. pp. 573-580.
@article{2414654926a44484b352a5a6902f41d8,
title = "Reasons provided by prescribers when overriding drug-drug interaction alerts",
abstract = "Objectives: To investigate prescribers' rationales for overriding drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and to determine whether these reasons were helpful to pharmacists as a part of prescription order verification. Study Design: An observational retrospective database analysis was conducted using override reasons derived from a computerized system at 6 Veterans Affairs medical centers. Methods: Data on DDI alerts (for interactions designated as {"}critical{"} and {"}significant{"}) were obtained from ambulatory care pharmacy records from July 1, 2003, to June 30, 2004. Prescribers' reasons for overriding alerts were organized into 14 categories and were then rated as clinically useful or not to the pharmacist in the assessment of potential patient harm. Results: Of 291 890 overrides identified, 72{\%} were for critical DDIs. Across the Veterans Affairs medical centers, only 20{\%} of the override reasons for critical DDI alerts were rated as clinically useful for order verification. Despite a mandatory override reason for critical DDI alerts, 53{\%} of the responses were {"}no reason provided.{"} The top response categories for critical and significant DDI alerts were {"}no reason provided,{"} {"}patient has been taking combination,{"} and {"}patient being monitored.{"} Conclusions: When given the opportunity to provide a reason for overriding a DDI alert, prescribers rarely enter clinical justifications that are useful to order verification pharmacists. This brings into question how computerized physician order entry systems should be designed.",
author = "Grizzle, {Amy J.} and Mahmood, {Maysaa H.} and Yu Ko and Murphy, {John E.} and Armstrong, {Edward P.} and Skrepnek, {Grant H.} and Jones, {William N.} and Schepers, {Gregory P.} and Nichol, {W. Paul} and Antoun Houranieh and Dare, {Donna C.} and Hoey, {Christopher T.} and Malone, {Daniel C.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "573--580",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasons provided by prescribers when overriding drug-drug interaction alerts

AU - Grizzle, Amy J.

AU - Mahmood, Maysaa H.

AU - Ko, Yu

AU - Murphy, John E.

AU - Armstrong, Edward P.

AU - Skrepnek, Grant H.

AU - Jones, William N.

AU - Schepers, Gregory P.

AU - Nichol, W. Paul

AU - Houranieh, Antoun

AU - Dare, Donna C.

AU - Hoey, Christopher T.

AU - Malone, Daniel C.

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Objectives: To investigate prescribers' rationales for overriding drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and to determine whether these reasons were helpful to pharmacists as a part of prescription order verification. Study Design: An observational retrospective database analysis was conducted using override reasons derived from a computerized system at 6 Veterans Affairs medical centers. Methods: Data on DDI alerts (for interactions designated as "critical" and "significant") were obtained from ambulatory care pharmacy records from July 1, 2003, to June 30, 2004. Prescribers' reasons for overriding alerts were organized into 14 categories and were then rated as clinically useful or not to the pharmacist in the assessment of potential patient harm. Results: Of 291 890 overrides identified, 72% were for critical DDIs. Across the Veterans Affairs medical centers, only 20% of the override reasons for critical DDI alerts were rated as clinically useful for order verification. Despite a mandatory override reason for critical DDI alerts, 53% of the responses were "no reason provided." The top response categories for critical and significant DDI alerts were "no reason provided," "patient has been taking combination," and "patient being monitored." Conclusions: When given the opportunity to provide a reason for overriding a DDI alert, prescribers rarely enter clinical justifications that are useful to order verification pharmacists. This brings into question how computerized physician order entry systems should be designed.

AB - Objectives: To investigate prescribers' rationales for overriding drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and to determine whether these reasons were helpful to pharmacists as a part of prescription order verification. Study Design: An observational retrospective database analysis was conducted using override reasons derived from a computerized system at 6 Veterans Affairs medical centers. Methods: Data on DDI alerts (for interactions designated as "critical" and "significant") were obtained from ambulatory care pharmacy records from July 1, 2003, to June 30, 2004. Prescribers' reasons for overriding alerts were organized into 14 categories and were then rated as clinically useful or not to the pharmacist in the assessment of potential patient harm. Results: Of 291 890 overrides identified, 72% were for critical DDIs. Across the Veterans Affairs medical centers, only 20% of the override reasons for critical DDI alerts were rated as clinically useful for order verification. Despite a mandatory override reason for critical DDI alerts, 53% of the responses were "no reason provided." The top response categories for critical and significant DDI alerts were "no reason provided," "patient has been taking combination," and "patient being monitored." Conclusions: When given the opportunity to provide a reason for overriding a DDI alert, prescribers rarely enter clinical justifications that are useful to order verification pharmacists. This brings into question how computerized physician order entry systems should be designed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35348945370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35348945370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 573

EP - 580

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 10

ER -