Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries

Mau-Roung Lin, Hei Fen Hwang, Kuo Piao Chung, Chingchaw Huang, Chih Yi Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose. The rating scale (RS), standard gamble (SG), and time trade-off (TTO) for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) have not been reported. This study compared psychometric performances of these preference-based measures among people with SCIs in Taiwan. Subjects and Methods. In total, 187 subjects from a nationwide registry of people with traumatic SCIs were interviewed by telephone. Score distributions, interrater reliability, discriminant ability, and convergent validity for the RS, SG, and TTO were compared. Results. The mean (median) values of the RS, SG, and TTO were 0.67 (0.70), 0.64 (0.75), and 0.53 (0.50), respectively, and their corresponding intraclass correlation coefficients for intrarater and interrater test-retest reliability were .92 and .89, .78 and .73, and .91 and .78. Compared with the SG and TTO, the RS had fewer floor and ceiling values as well as percent changes, more missing observations, a larger effect size, and better discrimination ability. The results of Spearman correlation and factor analysis showed that the SG strongly converged with the TTO (r = .65, and in a single common factor), but they weakly converged with the RS (r = .33 with the SG and r = .27 with the TTO). In the linear regression models, the RS was significantly associated with neurological severity, employment, educational level, and self-care ability; the SG was associated with neurological severity and employment; and the TTO was associated only with neurological severity. Discussion and Conclusion. The RS generally performed better than the SG and TTO among people with traumatic SCIs; however, the underlying construct measured by the RS differed considerably from those measured by the SG and TTO.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-344
Number of pages8
JournalPhysical Therapy
Volume86
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Aptitude
Linear Models
Self Care
Taiwan
Telephone
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical Factor Analysis
Registries

Keywords

  • Health-related quality of life
  • Preference
  • Rating scale
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Standard gamble
  • Time trade-off

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Lin, M-R., Hwang, H. F., Chung, K. P., Huang, C., & Chen, C. Y. (2006). Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries. Physical Therapy, 86(3), 337-344.

Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries. / Lin, Mau-Roung; Hwang, Hei Fen; Chung, Kuo Piao; Huang, Chingchaw; Chen, Chih Yi.

In: Physical Therapy, Vol. 86, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 337-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lin, M-R, Hwang, HF, Chung, KP, Huang, C & Chen, CY 2006, 'Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries', Physical Therapy, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 337-344.
Lin, Mau-Roung ; Hwang, Hei Fen ; Chung, Kuo Piao ; Huang, Chingchaw ; Chen, Chih Yi. / Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries. In: Physical Therapy. 2006 ; Vol. 86, No. 3. pp. 337-344.
@article{8abbf87b642242009d0d9f8648d0dc97,
title = "Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries",
abstract = "Background and Purpose. The rating scale (RS), standard gamble (SG), and time trade-off (TTO) for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) have not been reported. This study compared psychometric performances of these preference-based measures among people with SCIs in Taiwan. Subjects and Methods. In total, 187 subjects from a nationwide registry of people with traumatic SCIs were interviewed by telephone. Score distributions, interrater reliability, discriminant ability, and convergent validity for the RS, SG, and TTO were compared. Results. The mean (median) values of the RS, SG, and TTO were 0.67 (0.70), 0.64 (0.75), and 0.53 (0.50), respectively, and their corresponding intraclass correlation coefficients for intrarater and interrater test-retest reliability were .92 and .89, .78 and .73, and .91 and .78. Compared with the SG and TTO, the RS had fewer floor and ceiling values as well as percent changes, more missing observations, a larger effect size, and better discrimination ability. The results of Spearman correlation and factor analysis showed that the SG strongly converged with the TTO (r = .65, and in a single common factor), but they weakly converged with the RS (r = .33 with the SG and r = .27 with the TTO). In the linear regression models, the RS was significantly associated with neurological severity, employment, educational level, and self-care ability; the SG was associated with neurological severity and employment; and the TTO was associated only with neurological severity. Discussion and Conclusion. The RS generally performed better than the SG and TTO among people with traumatic SCIs; however, the underlying construct measured by the RS differed considerably from those measured by the SG and TTO.",
keywords = "Health-related quality of life, Preference, Rating scale, Spinal cord injury, Standard gamble, Time trade-off",
author = "Mau-Roung Lin and Hwang, {Hei Fen} and Chung, {Kuo Piao} and Chingchaw Huang and Chen, {Chih Yi}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "337--344",
journal = "Physical Therapy",
issn = "0031-9023",
publisher = "American Physical Therapy Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries

AU - Lin, Mau-Roung

AU - Hwang, Hei Fen

AU - Chung, Kuo Piao

AU - Huang, Chingchaw

AU - Chen, Chih Yi

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Background and Purpose. The rating scale (RS), standard gamble (SG), and time trade-off (TTO) for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) have not been reported. This study compared psychometric performances of these preference-based measures among people with SCIs in Taiwan. Subjects and Methods. In total, 187 subjects from a nationwide registry of people with traumatic SCIs were interviewed by telephone. Score distributions, interrater reliability, discriminant ability, and convergent validity for the RS, SG, and TTO were compared. Results. The mean (median) values of the RS, SG, and TTO were 0.67 (0.70), 0.64 (0.75), and 0.53 (0.50), respectively, and their corresponding intraclass correlation coefficients for intrarater and interrater test-retest reliability were .92 and .89, .78 and .73, and .91 and .78. Compared with the SG and TTO, the RS had fewer floor and ceiling values as well as percent changes, more missing observations, a larger effect size, and better discrimination ability. The results of Spearman correlation and factor analysis showed that the SG strongly converged with the TTO (r = .65, and in a single common factor), but they weakly converged with the RS (r = .33 with the SG and r = .27 with the TTO). In the linear regression models, the RS was significantly associated with neurological severity, employment, educational level, and self-care ability; the SG was associated with neurological severity and employment; and the TTO was associated only with neurological severity. Discussion and Conclusion. The RS generally performed better than the SG and TTO among people with traumatic SCIs; however, the underlying construct measured by the RS differed considerably from those measured by the SG and TTO.

AB - Background and Purpose. The rating scale (RS), standard gamble (SG), and time trade-off (TTO) for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) have not been reported. This study compared psychometric performances of these preference-based measures among people with SCIs in Taiwan. Subjects and Methods. In total, 187 subjects from a nationwide registry of people with traumatic SCIs were interviewed by telephone. Score distributions, interrater reliability, discriminant ability, and convergent validity for the RS, SG, and TTO were compared. Results. The mean (median) values of the RS, SG, and TTO were 0.67 (0.70), 0.64 (0.75), and 0.53 (0.50), respectively, and their corresponding intraclass correlation coefficients for intrarater and interrater test-retest reliability were .92 and .89, .78 and .73, and .91 and .78. Compared with the SG and TTO, the RS had fewer floor and ceiling values as well as percent changes, more missing observations, a larger effect size, and better discrimination ability. The results of Spearman correlation and factor analysis showed that the SG strongly converged with the TTO (r = .65, and in a single common factor), but they weakly converged with the RS (r = .33 with the SG and r = .27 with the TTO). In the linear regression models, the RS was significantly associated with neurological severity, employment, educational level, and self-care ability; the SG was associated with neurological severity and employment; and the TTO was associated only with neurological severity. Discussion and Conclusion. The RS generally performed better than the SG and TTO among people with traumatic SCIs; however, the underlying construct measured by the RS differed considerably from those measured by the SG and TTO.

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Preference

KW - Rating scale

KW - Spinal cord injury

KW - Standard gamble

KW - Time trade-off

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644928989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644928989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16506870

AN - SCOPUS:33644928989

VL - 86

SP - 337

EP - 344

JO - Physical Therapy

JF - Physical Therapy

SN - 0031-9023

IS - 3

ER -