Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses

Woo Kyung Moon, Chung Ming Lo, Jung Min Chang, Chiun Sheng Huang, Jeon Hor Chen, Ruey Feng Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accuracy of an ultrasound (US) computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was evaluated for the classification of BI-RADS category 3, probably benign masses. The US database used in this study contained 69 breast masses (21 malignant and 48 benign masses) that at blinded retrospective interpretation were assigned to BI-RADS category 3 by at least one of five radiologists. For computer-aided analysis, multiple morphology (shape, orientation, margin, lesions boundary, and posterior acoustic features) and texture (echo patterns) features based on BI-RADS lexicon were implemented, and the binary logistic regression model was used for classification. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used for statistical analysis. The area under the curve (Az) of morphology, texture, and combined features were 0.90, 0.75, and 0.95, respectively. The combined features achieved the best performance and were significantly better than using texture features only (0.95 vs. 0.75, p value = 0.0163). The cut-off point at the sensitivity of 86 % (18/21), 95 % (20/21), and 100 % (21/21) achieved the specificity of 90 % (43/48), 73 % (35/48), and 33 % (16/48), respectively. In conclusion, the proposed CAD system has the potential to be used in upgrading malignant masses misclassified as BI-RADS category 3 on US by the radiologists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1091-1098
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Digital Imaging
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Computer aided diagnosis
Breast
Textures
Ultrasonics
Logistic Models
Computer aided analysis
Acoustics
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Logistics
Statistical methods
Databases
Radiologists

Keywords

  • BI-RADS
  • Breast cancer
  • Computer-assisted diagnosis
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Moon, W. K., Lo, C. M., Chang, J. M., Huang, C. S., Chen, J. H., & Chang, R. F. (2013). Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses. Journal of Digital Imaging, 26(6), 1091-1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-013-9593-8

Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses. / Moon, Woo Kyung; Lo, Chung Ming; Chang, Jung Min; Huang, Chiun Sheng; Chen, Jeon Hor; Chang, Ruey Feng.

In: Journal of Digital Imaging, Vol. 26, No. 6, 12.2013, p. 1091-1098.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moon, WK, Lo, CM, Chang, JM, Huang, CS, Chen, JH & Chang, RF 2013, 'Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses', Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1091-1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-013-9593-8
Moon, Woo Kyung ; Lo, Chung Ming ; Chang, Jung Min ; Huang, Chiun Sheng ; Chen, Jeon Hor ; Chang, Ruey Feng. / Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses. In: Journal of Digital Imaging. 2013 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 1091-1098.
@article{8df0c359dce6405cbbdb0e89beaa58cf,
title = "Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses",
abstract = "The accuracy of an ultrasound (US) computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was evaluated for the classification of BI-RADS category 3, probably benign masses. The US database used in this study contained 69 breast masses (21 malignant and 48 benign masses) that at blinded retrospective interpretation were assigned to BI-RADS category 3 by at least one of five radiologists. For computer-aided analysis, multiple morphology (shape, orientation, margin, lesions boundary, and posterior acoustic features) and texture (echo patterns) features based on BI-RADS lexicon were implemented, and the binary logistic regression model was used for classification. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used for statistical analysis. The area under the curve (Az) of morphology, texture, and combined features were 0.90, 0.75, and 0.95, respectively. The combined features achieved the best performance and were significantly better than using texture features only (0.95 vs. 0.75, p value = 0.0163). The cut-off point at the sensitivity of 86 {\%} (18/21), 95 {\%} (20/21), and 100 {\%} (21/21) achieved the specificity of 90 {\%} (43/48), 73 {\%} (35/48), and 33 {\%} (16/48), respectively. In conclusion, the proposed CAD system has the potential to be used in upgrading malignant masses misclassified as BI-RADS category 3 on US by the radiologists.",
keywords = "BI-RADS, Breast cancer, Computer-assisted diagnosis, Ultrasound",
author = "Moon, {Woo Kyung} and Lo, {Chung Ming} and Chang, {Jung Min} and Huang, {Chiun Sheng} and Chen, {Jeon Hor} and Chang, {Ruey Feng}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10278-013-9593-8",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1091--1098",
journal = "Journal of Digital Imaging",
issn = "0897-1889",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses

AU - Moon, Woo Kyung

AU - Lo, Chung Ming

AU - Chang, Jung Min

AU - Huang, Chiun Sheng

AU - Chen, Jeon Hor

AU - Chang, Ruey Feng

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - The accuracy of an ultrasound (US) computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was evaluated for the classification of BI-RADS category 3, probably benign masses. The US database used in this study contained 69 breast masses (21 malignant and 48 benign masses) that at blinded retrospective interpretation were assigned to BI-RADS category 3 by at least one of five radiologists. For computer-aided analysis, multiple morphology (shape, orientation, margin, lesions boundary, and posterior acoustic features) and texture (echo patterns) features based on BI-RADS lexicon were implemented, and the binary logistic regression model was used for classification. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used for statistical analysis. The area under the curve (Az) of morphology, texture, and combined features were 0.90, 0.75, and 0.95, respectively. The combined features achieved the best performance and were significantly better than using texture features only (0.95 vs. 0.75, p value = 0.0163). The cut-off point at the sensitivity of 86 % (18/21), 95 % (20/21), and 100 % (21/21) achieved the specificity of 90 % (43/48), 73 % (35/48), and 33 % (16/48), respectively. In conclusion, the proposed CAD system has the potential to be used in upgrading malignant masses misclassified as BI-RADS category 3 on US by the radiologists.

AB - The accuracy of an ultrasound (US) computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was evaluated for the classification of BI-RADS category 3, probably benign masses. The US database used in this study contained 69 breast masses (21 malignant and 48 benign masses) that at blinded retrospective interpretation were assigned to BI-RADS category 3 by at least one of five radiologists. For computer-aided analysis, multiple morphology (shape, orientation, margin, lesions boundary, and posterior acoustic features) and texture (echo patterns) features based on BI-RADS lexicon were implemented, and the binary logistic regression model was used for classification. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used for statistical analysis. The area under the curve (Az) of morphology, texture, and combined features were 0.90, 0.75, and 0.95, respectively. The combined features achieved the best performance and were significantly better than using texture features only (0.95 vs. 0.75, p value = 0.0163). The cut-off point at the sensitivity of 86 % (18/21), 95 % (20/21), and 100 % (21/21) achieved the specificity of 90 % (43/48), 73 % (35/48), and 33 % (16/48), respectively. In conclusion, the proposed CAD system has the potential to be used in upgrading malignant masses misclassified as BI-RADS category 3 on US by the radiologists.

KW - BI-RADS

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Computer-assisted diagnosis

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888200859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888200859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10278-013-9593-8

DO - 10.1007/s10278-013-9593-8

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1091

EP - 1098

JO - Journal of Digital Imaging

JF - Journal of Digital Imaging

SN - 0897-1889

IS - 6

ER -