Quality of life in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35

Wei Chu Chie, R. L. Hong, C. C. Lai, L. L. Ting, M. M. Hsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors followed the guidelines of translation and pilot testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. The questionnaires were given to 50 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients under active treatment and 50 under follow-up at our institution from November 2000 to June 2001. A retest was conducted 2 weeks after the first interview/form completion for the follow-up group. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the two questionnaires were moderate to high in the follow-up group. Cronbach's α coefficients of all scales of the two questionnaires were ≥0.70 except that of cognitive functioning. Correlation of scales measuring similar dimensions of the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to high, while that of the QLQ-H&N35 and the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to low. Patients in the active treatment group had more serious acute problems due to disease and chemotherapy. Patients in the follow-up group had more serious chronic problems due to radiation therapy. We concluded that the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 had moderate to high test-retest reliability, high internal consistency in most scales, and could show the expected differences between patients in active treatment and follow-up group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-98
Number of pages6
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Taiwan
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Radiotherapy
Therapeutics
Guidelines
Interviews
Drug Therapy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Keywords

  • Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  • Quality of life
  • The EORTC QLQ-C30
  • The EORTC QLQ-H&N35

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Quality of life in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma : Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35. / Chie, Wei Chu; Hong, R. L.; Lai, C. C.; Ting, L. L.; Hsu, M. M.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.02.2003, p. 93-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6ab77284bec04453b3417cabf23cfcc6,
title = "Quality of life in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35",
abstract = "The authors followed the guidelines of translation and pilot testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. The questionnaires were given to 50 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients under active treatment and 50 under follow-up at our institution from November 2000 to June 2001. A retest was conducted 2 weeks after the first interview/form completion for the follow-up group. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the two questionnaires were moderate to high in the follow-up group. Cronbach's α coefficients of all scales of the two questionnaires were ≥0.70 except that of cognitive functioning. Correlation of scales measuring similar dimensions of the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to high, while that of the QLQ-H&N35 and the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to low. Patients in the active treatment group had more serious acute problems due to disease and chemotherapy. Patients in the follow-up group had more serious chronic problems due to radiation therapy. We concluded that the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 had moderate to high test-retest reliability, high internal consistency in most scales, and could show the expected differences between patients in active treatment and follow-up group.",
keywords = "Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Quality of life, The EORTC QLQ-C30, The EORTC QLQ-H&N35",
author = "Chie, {Wei Chu} and Hong, {R. L.} and Lai, {C. C.} and Ting, {L. L.} and Hsu, {M. M.}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1022070220328",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "93--98",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of life in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

T2 - Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35

AU - Chie, Wei Chu

AU - Hong, R. L.

AU - Lai, C. C.

AU - Ting, L. L.

AU - Hsu, M. M.

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - The authors followed the guidelines of translation and pilot testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. The questionnaires were given to 50 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients under active treatment and 50 under follow-up at our institution from November 2000 to June 2001. A retest was conducted 2 weeks after the first interview/form completion for the follow-up group. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the two questionnaires were moderate to high in the follow-up group. Cronbach's α coefficients of all scales of the two questionnaires were ≥0.70 except that of cognitive functioning. Correlation of scales measuring similar dimensions of the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to high, while that of the QLQ-H&N35 and the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to low. Patients in the active treatment group had more serious acute problems due to disease and chemotherapy. Patients in the follow-up group had more serious chronic problems due to radiation therapy. We concluded that the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 had moderate to high test-retest reliability, high internal consistency in most scales, and could show the expected differences between patients in active treatment and follow-up group.

AB - The authors followed the guidelines of translation and pilot testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. The questionnaires were given to 50 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients under active treatment and 50 under follow-up at our institution from November 2000 to June 2001. A retest was conducted 2 weeks after the first interview/form completion for the follow-up group. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the two questionnaires were moderate to high in the follow-up group. Cronbach's α coefficients of all scales of the two questionnaires were ≥0.70 except that of cognitive functioning. Correlation of scales measuring similar dimensions of the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to high, while that of the QLQ-H&N35 and the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to low. Patients in the active treatment group had more serious acute problems due to disease and chemotherapy. Patients in the follow-up group had more serious chronic problems due to radiation therapy. We concluded that the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 had moderate to high test-retest reliability, high internal consistency in most scales, and could show the expected differences between patients in active treatment and follow-up group.

KW - Nasopharyngeal carcinoma

KW - Quality of life

KW - The EORTC QLQ-C30

KW - The EORTC QLQ-H&N35

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037321608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037321608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1022070220328

DO - 10.1023/A:1022070220328

M3 - Article

C2 - 12625522

AN - SCOPUS:0037321608

VL - 12

SP - 93

EP - 98

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 1

ER -