Preservation versus division of ilioinguinal nerve on open mesh repair of inguinal hernia

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Wayne Hsu, Ching Shyang Chen, Hung Chia Lee, Hung Hua Liang, Li Jen Kuo, Po Li Wei, Ka Wai Tam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia repair, a serious problem, is caused by entrapment of the ilioinguinal nerve either by mesh or development of fibrosis. Division of the ilioinguinal nerve during hernioplasty has been found to reduce the incidence of chronic groin pain. However, the traditional approach favors preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve during open hernia repair. Methods We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the outcomes of preservation versus division of the ilioinguinal nerve during open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. The primary outcome was the incidence of groin pain; secondary outcomes were numbness and sensory loss. Results We reviewed six trials with 1,286 patients. We found no difference between the groups for the incidence of groin pain or numbness at 1, 6, and 12 months after open mesh inguinal repair. The incidence of sensory loss or change was significantly higher in the division group than in the preservation group at 6 months [risk ratio (RR) 1.25; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.53] and at 12 months (RR 1.55; 95 % CI 1.01-2.37) postoperatively. No significant differences between the groups were noted at any other points in time. Conclusions Preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve during open mesh repair of inguinal hernia is associated with a decreased incidence of sensory loss at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared with that of the division technique. No significant differences were found between the groups for chronic groin pain or numbness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2311-2319
Number of pages9
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume36
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Groin
Inguinal Hernia
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Hypesthesia
Herniorrhaphy
Chronic Pain
Incidence
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Nerve Compression Syndromes
Pain
Fibrosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Preservation versus division of ilioinguinal nerve on open mesh repair of inguinal hernia : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. / Hsu, Wayne; Chen, Ching Shyang; Lee, Hung Chia; Liang, Hung Hua; Kuo, Li Jen; Wei, Po Li; Tam, Ka Wai.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 2311-2319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4c9a726f089543e1add13fe9718e2c33,
title = "Preservation versus division of ilioinguinal nerve on open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials",
abstract = "Background Chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia repair, a serious problem, is caused by entrapment of the ilioinguinal nerve either by mesh or development of fibrosis. Division of the ilioinguinal nerve during hernioplasty has been found to reduce the incidence of chronic groin pain. However, the traditional approach favors preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve during open hernia repair. Methods We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the outcomes of preservation versus division of the ilioinguinal nerve during open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. The primary outcome was the incidence of groin pain; secondary outcomes were numbness and sensory loss. Results We reviewed six trials with 1,286 patients. We found no difference between the groups for the incidence of groin pain or numbness at 1, 6, and 12 months after open mesh inguinal repair. The incidence of sensory loss or change was significantly higher in the division group than in the preservation group at 6 months [risk ratio (RR) 1.25; 95 {\%} confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.53] and at 12 months (RR 1.55; 95 {\%} CI 1.01-2.37) postoperatively. No significant differences between the groups were noted at any other points in time. Conclusions Preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve during open mesh repair of inguinal hernia is associated with a decreased incidence of sensory loss at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared with that of the division technique. No significant differences were found between the groups for chronic groin pain or numbness.",
author = "Wayne Hsu and Chen, {Ching Shyang} and Lee, {Hung Chia} and Liang, {Hung Hua} and Kuo, {Li Jen} and Wei, {Po Li} and Tam, {Ka Wai}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-012-1657-2",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "2311--2319",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preservation versus division of ilioinguinal nerve on open mesh repair of inguinal hernia

T2 - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AU - Hsu, Wayne

AU - Chen, Ching Shyang

AU - Lee, Hung Chia

AU - Liang, Hung Hua

AU - Kuo, Li Jen

AU - Wei, Po Li

AU - Tam, Ka Wai

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Background Chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia repair, a serious problem, is caused by entrapment of the ilioinguinal nerve either by mesh or development of fibrosis. Division of the ilioinguinal nerve during hernioplasty has been found to reduce the incidence of chronic groin pain. However, the traditional approach favors preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve during open hernia repair. Methods We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the outcomes of preservation versus division of the ilioinguinal nerve during open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. The primary outcome was the incidence of groin pain; secondary outcomes were numbness and sensory loss. Results We reviewed six trials with 1,286 patients. We found no difference between the groups for the incidence of groin pain or numbness at 1, 6, and 12 months after open mesh inguinal repair. The incidence of sensory loss or change was significantly higher in the division group than in the preservation group at 6 months [risk ratio (RR) 1.25; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.53] and at 12 months (RR 1.55; 95 % CI 1.01-2.37) postoperatively. No significant differences between the groups were noted at any other points in time. Conclusions Preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve during open mesh repair of inguinal hernia is associated with a decreased incidence of sensory loss at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared with that of the division technique. No significant differences were found between the groups for chronic groin pain or numbness.

AB - Background Chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia repair, a serious problem, is caused by entrapment of the ilioinguinal nerve either by mesh or development of fibrosis. Division of the ilioinguinal nerve during hernioplasty has been found to reduce the incidence of chronic groin pain. However, the traditional approach favors preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve during open hernia repair. Methods We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the outcomes of preservation versus division of the ilioinguinal nerve during open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. The primary outcome was the incidence of groin pain; secondary outcomes were numbness and sensory loss. Results We reviewed six trials with 1,286 patients. We found no difference between the groups for the incidence of groin pain or numbness at 1, 6, and 12 months after open mesh inguinal repair. The incidence of sensory loss or change was significantly higher in the division group than in the preservation group at 6 months [risk ratio (RR) 1.25; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.53] and at 12 months (RR 1.55; 95 % CI 1.01-2.37) postoperatively. No significant differences between the groups were noted at any other points in time. Conclusions Preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve during open mesh repair of inguinal hernia is associated with a decreased incidence of sensory loss at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared with that of the division technique. No significant differences were found between the groups for chronic groin pain or numbness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867874458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867874458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-012-1657-2

DO - 10.1007/s00268-012-1657-2

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 2311

EP - 2319

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 10

ER -