Prepared or not prepared: Top-down modulation on memory of features and feature bindings

Cheng Ta Yang, Philip Tseng, Kuan Yao Huang, Yei Yu Yeh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Orienting attention to the to-be-tested representations can enhance representations and protect them from interference. Previous studies have found that this effect on feature and bound representations was comparable despite their difference in stability. This may have occurred because participants were tested in a block design, which is susceptible to participants' effective top-down control on the cued representations based on the predictability of the design. In this study, we investigated how the foreknowledge of when and what to expect would affect visual representations in a change-detection task. Cue onset time was either early or late; changes included either features or feature bindings. When predictability was maximized via a block design (Experiments 1, 5, and 6), early cues equally facilitated both representations while late cues did not affect either representation. When either cue onset time (Experiment 2) or change type (Experiment 3) was unpredictable, early cues consistently facilitated feature representations, while bound representations were enhanced only when cue onset time was predictable. Additionally, late cuing only cost bound representations. Finally, when both factors were no longer predictable via an intermixed design (Experiment 4), early-cuing benefit was eliminated, with a late cuing cost for the bound representations. These results highlight the critical role of effective top-down control in memory maintenance for visual representations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-335
Number of pages9
JournalActa Psychologica
Volume141
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cues
Costs and Cost Analysis
Top-down
Modulation
Experiment
Maintenance
Onset
Predictability
Costs
Visual Representation

Keywords

  • Feature binding
  • Spatial cuing
  • Top-down control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Prepared or not prepared : Top-down modulation on memory of features and feature bindings. / Yang, Cheng Ta; Tseng, Philip; Huang, Kuan Yao; Yeh, Yei Yu.

In: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 141, No. 3, 2012, p. 327-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yang, Cheng Ta ; Tseng, Philip ; Huang, Kuan Yao ; Yeh, Yei Yu. / Prepared or not prepared : Top-down modulation on memory of features and feature bindings. In: Acta Psychologica. 2012 ; Vol. 141, No. 3. pp. 327-335.
@article{2d2dd321ef324522bd59b0309edd2e56,
title = "Prepared or not prepared: Top-down modulation on memory of features and feature bindings",
abstract = "Orienting attention to the to-be-tested representations can enhance representations and protect them from interference. Previous studies have found that this effect on feature and bound representations was comparable despite their difference in stability. This may have occurred because participants were tested in a block design, which is susceptible to participants' effective top-down control on the cued representations based on the predictability of the design. In this study, we investigated how the foreknowledge of when and what to expect would affect visual representations in a change-detection task. Cue onset time was either early or late; changes included either features or feature bindings. When predictability was maximized via a block design (Experiments 1, 5, and 6), early cues equally facilitated both representations while late cues did not affect either representation. When either cue onset time (Experiment 2) or change type (Experiment 3) was unpredictable, early cues consistently facilitated feature representations, while bound representations were enhanced only when cue onset time was predictable. Additionally, late cuing only cost bound representations. Finally, when both factors were no longer predictable via an intermixed design (Experiment 4), early-cuing benefit was eliminated, with a late cuing cost for the bound representations. These results highlight the critical role of effective top-down control in memory maintenance for visual representations.",
keywords = "Feature binding, Spatial cuing, Top-down control",
author = "Yang, {Cheng Ta} and Philip Tseng and Huang, {Kuan Yao} and Yeh, {Yei Yu}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.010",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
pages = "327--335",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
issn = "0001-6918",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prepared or not prepared

T2 - Top-down modulation on memory of features and feature bindings

AU - Yang, Cheng Ta

AU - Tseng, Philip

AU - Huang, Kuan Yao

AU - Yeh, Yei Yu

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Orienting attention to the to-be-tested representations can enhance representations and protect them from interference. Previous studies have found that this effect on feature and bound representations was comparable despite their difference in stability. This may have occurred because participants were tested in a block design, which is susceptible to participants' effective top-down control on the cued representations based on the predictability of the design. In this study, we investigated how the foreknowledge of when and what to expect would affect visual representations in a change-detection task. Cue onset time was either early or late; changes included either features or feature bindings. When predictability was maximized via a block design (Experiments 1, 5, and 6), early cues equally facilitated both representations while late cues did not affect either representation. When either cue onset time (Experiment 2) or change type (Experiment 3) was unpredictable, early cues consistently facilitated feature representations, while bound representations were enhanced only when cue onset time was predictable. Additionally, late cuing only cost bound representations. Finally, when both factors were no longer predictable via an intermixed design (Experiment 4), early-cuing benefit was eliminated, with a late cuing cost for the bound representations. These results highlight the critical role of effective top-down control in memory maintenance for visual representations.

AB - Orienting attention to the to-be-tested representations can enhance representations and protect them from interference. Previous studies have found that this effect on feature and bound representations was comparable despite their difference in stability. This may have occurred because participants were tested in a block design, which is susceptible to participants' effective top-down control on the cued representations based on the predictability of the design. In this study, we investigated how the foreknowledge of when and what to expect would affect visual representations in a change-detection task. Cue onset time was either early or late; changes included either features or feature bindings. When predictability was maximized via a block design (Experiments 1, 5, and 6), early cues equally facilitated both representations while late cues did not affect either representation. When either cue onset time (Experiment 2) or change type (Experiment 3) was unpredictable, early cues consistently facilitated feature representations, while bound representations were enhanced only when cue onset time was predictable. Additionally, late cuing only cost bound representations. Finally, when both factors were no longer predictable via an intermixed design (Experiment 4), early-cuing benefit was eliminated, with a late cuing cost for the bound representations. These results highlight the critical role of effective top-down control in memory maintenance for visual representations.

KW - Feature binding

KW - Spatial cuing

KW - Top-down control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867615209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867615209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.010

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 23089041

AN - SCOPUS:84867615209

VL - 141

SP - 327

EP - 335

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

SN - 0001-6918

IS - 3

ER -