Practitioners' Views on Computerized Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts in the VA System

Yu Ko, Jacob Abarca, Daniel C. Malone, Donna C. Dare, Doug Geraets, Antoun Houranieh, William N. Jones, W. Paul Nichol, Gregory P. Schepers, Michelle Wilhardt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To assess Veterans Affairs (VA) prescribers' and pharmacists' opinions about computer-generated drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and obtain suggestions for improving DDI alerts. Design: A mail survey of 725 prescribers and 142 pharmacists from seven VA medical centers across the United States. Measurements: A questionnaire asked respondents about their sources of drug and DDI information, satisfaction with the combined inpatient and outpatient computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) system, attitude toward DDI alerts, and suggestions for improving DDI alerts. Results: The overall response rate was 40% (prescribers: 36%; pharmacists: 59%). Both prescribers and pharmacists indicated that the CPOE system had a neutral to positive impact on their jobs. DDI alerts were not viewed as a waste of time and the majority (61%) of prescribers felt that DDI alerts had increased their potential to prescribe safely. However, only 30% of prescribers felt DDI alerts provided them with what they needed most of the time. Both prescribers and pharmacists agreed that DDI alerts should be accompanied by management alternatives (73% and 82%, respectively) and more detailed information (65% and 89%, respectively). When asked about suggestions for improving DDI alerts, prescribers most preferred including management options whereas pharmacists most preferred making it more difficult to override lethal interactions. Prescribers and pharmacists reported primarily relying on electronic references for general drug information (62% and 55%, respectively) and DDI information (51% and 79%, respectively). Conclusion: Respondents reported neutral to positive views regarding the effect of CPOE on their jobs. Their opinions suggest DDI alerts are useful but still require additional work to increase their clinical utility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-64
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Veterans
Drug Interactions
Pharmacists
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Postal Service
Inpatients
Outpatients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Practitioners' Views on Computerized Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts in the VA System. / Ko, Yu; Abarca, Jacob; Malone, Daniel C.; Dare, Donna C.; Geraets, Doug; Houranieh, Antoun; Jones, William N.; Nichol, W. Paul; Schepers, Gregory P.; Wilhardt, Michelle.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 56-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ko, Y, Abarca, J, Malone, DC, Dare, DC, Geraets, D, Houranieh, A, Jones, WN, Nichol, WP, Schepers, GP & Wilhardt, M 2007, 'Practitioners' Views on Computerized Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts in the VA System', Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2224
Ko, Yu ; Abarca, Jacob ; Malone, Daniel C. ; Dare, Donna C. ; Geraets, Doug ; Houranieh, Antoun ; Jones, William N. ; Nichol, W. Paul ; Schepers, Gregory P. ; Wilhardt, Michelle. / Practitioners' Views on Computerized Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts in the VA System. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 56-64.
@article{004e1e9e216f47b6aa11d6b278cc0c4e,
title = "Practitioners' Views on Computerized Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts in the VA System",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess Veterans Affairs (VA) prescribers' and pharmacists' opinions about computer-generated drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and obtain suggestions for improving DDI alerts. Design: A mail survey of 725 prescribers and 142 pharmacists from seven VA medical centers across the United States. Measurements: A questionnaire asked respondents about their sources of drug and DDI information, satisfaction with the combined inpatient and outpatient computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) system, attitude toward DDI alerts, and suggestions for improving DDI alerts. Results: The overall response rate was 40{\%} (prescribers: 36{\%}; pharmacists: 59{\%}). Both prescribers and pharmacists indicated that the CPOE system had a neutral to positive impact on their jobs. DDI alerts were not viewed as a waste of time and the majority (61{\%}) of prescribers felt that DDI alerts had increased their potential to prescribe safely. However, only 30{\%} of prescribers felt DDI alerts provided them with what they needed most of the time. Both prescribers and pharmacists agreed that DDI alerts should be accompanied by management alternatives (73{\%} and 82{\%}, respectively) and more detailed information (65{\%} and 89{\%}, respectively). When asked about suggestions for improving DDI alerts, prescribers most preferred including management options whereas pharmacists most preferred making it more difficult to override lethal interactions. Prescribers and pharmacists reported primarily relying on electronic references for general drug information (62{\%} and 55{\%}, respectively) and DDI information (51{\%} and 79{\%}, respectively). Conclusion: Respondents reported neutral to positive views regarding the effect of CPOE on their jobs. Their opinions suggest DDI alerts are useful but still require additional work to increase their clinical utility.",
author = "Yu Ko and Jacob Abarca and Malone, {Daniel C.} and Dare, {Donna C.} and Doug Geraets and Antoun Houranieh and Jones, {William N.} and Nichol, {W. Paul} and Schepers, {Gregory P.} and Michelle Wilhardt",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1197/jamia.M2224",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "56--64",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practitioners' Views on Computerized Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts in the VA System

AU - Ko, Yu

AU - Abarca, Jacob

AU - Malone, Daniel C.

AU - Dare, Donna C.

AU - Geraets, Doug

AU - Houranieh, Antoun

AU - Jones, William N.

AU - Nichol, W. Paul

AU - Schepers, Gregory P.

AU - Wilhardt, Michelle

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - Objectives: To assess Veterans Affairs (VA) prescribers' and pharmacists' opinions about computer-generated drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and obtain suggestions for improving DDI alerts. Design: A mail survey of 725 prescribers and 142 pharmacists from seven VA medical centers across the United States. Measurements: A questionnaire asked respondents about their sources of drug and DDI information, satisfaction with the combined inpatient and outpatient computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) system, attitude toward DDI alerts, and suggestions for improving DDI alerts. Results: The overall response rate was 40% (prescribers: 36%; pharmacists: 59%). Both prescribers and pharmacists indicated that the CPOE system had a neutral to positive impact on their jobs. DDI alerts were not viewed as a waste of time and the majority (61%) of prescribers felt that DDI alerts had increased their potential to prescribe safely. However, only 30% of prescribers felt DDI alerts provided them with what they needed most of the time. Both prescribers and pharmacists agreed that DDI alerts should be accompanied by management alternatives (73% and 82%, respectively) and more detailed information (65% and 89%, respectively). When asked about suggestions for improving DDI alerts, prescribers most preferred including management options whereas pharmacists most preferred making it more difficult to override lethal interactions. Prescribers and pharmacists reported primarily relying on electronic references for general drug information (62% and 55%, respectively) and DDI information (51% and 79%, respectively). Conclusion: Respondents reported neutral to positive views regarding the effect of CPOE on their jobs. Their opinions suggest DDI alerts are useful but still require additional work to increase their clinical utility.

AB - Objectives: To assess Veterans Affairs (VA) prescribers' and pharmacists' opinions about computer-generated drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and obtain suggestions for improving DDI alerts. Design: A mail survey of 725 prescribers and 142 pharmacists from seven VA medical centers across the United States. Measurements: A questionnaire asked respondents about their sources of drug and DDI information, satisfaction with the combined inpatient and outpatient computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) system, attitude toward DDI alerts, and suggestions for improving DDI alerts. Results: The overall response rate was 40% (prescribers: 36%; pharmacists: 59%). Both prescribers and pharmacists indicated that the CPOE system had a neutral to positive impact on their jobs. DDI alerts were not viewed as a waste of time and the majority (61%) of prescribers felt that DDI alerts had increased their potential to prescribe safely. However, only 30% of prescribers felt DDI alerts provided them with what they needed most of the time. Both prescribers and pharmacists agreed that DDI alerts should be accompanied by management alternatives (73% and 82%, respectively) and more detailed information (65% and 89%, respectively). When asked about suggestions for improving DDI alerts, prescribers most preferred including management options whereas pharmacists most preferred making it more difficult to override lethal interactions. Prescribers and pharmacists reported primarily relying on electronic references for general drug information (62% and 55%, respectively) and DDI information (51% and 79%, respectively). Conclusion: Respondents reported neutral to positive views regarding the effect of CPOE on their jobs. Their opinions suggest DDI alerts are useful but still require additional work to increase their clinical utility.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845463347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845463347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/jamia.M2224

DO - 10.1197/jamia.M2224

M3 - Article

C2 - 17068346

AN - SCOPUS:33845463347

VL - 14

SP - 56

EP - 64

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 1

ER -