Physician supply, supplier-induced demand and competition: Empirical evidence from a single-payer system

Sudha Xirasagar, Herng Ching Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined the earnings of 8106 office-based (FTE) physicians in 2002 in Taiwan for evidence of supplier-induced demand (SID). We hypothesize that SID, operating in the form of mutual cross-specialty referral, will cause earnings to increase with total physician density (all specialties taken together), but simultaneously, decrease with increasing competition within specialties. We used multiple regression analyses controlling for high-user population, physician demographics and practice type. The evidence supports our hypotheses. Increasing total physician density (all specialties) is positively associated with earnings. Concurrently, within specialties, increased competition is associated with reduced earnings. The medical appropriateness of increasing health care utilization with increasing physician supply cannot be directly determined from the data. However, evidence of a steady earnings increase with increasing total physician density, which precludes a saturation point (of appropriate care levels) at some optimum physician density, substantiates SID in the office-based practice market. Empirically, our data suggest that the average market effect of physicians on one another is synergic when all specialties are considered together, but competitive within each specialty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-131
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Health Planning and Management
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Single-Payer System
supplier
physician
supply
Physicians
demand
evidence
Point-of-Care Systems
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
market
Taiwan
Referral and Consultation
utilization
Regression Analysis
Demography

Keywords

  • Competition
  • Physician earnings
  • Supplier-induced demand

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

@article{bd3ac529fa3e4d7eb8ba7d156667957e,
title = "Physician supply, supplier-induced demand and competition: Empirical evidence from a single-payer system",
abstract = "We examined the earnings of 8106 office-based (FTE) physicians in 2002 in Taiwan for evidence of supplier-induced demand (SID). We hypothesize that SID, operating in the form of mutual cross-specialty referral, will cause earnings to increase with total physician density (all specialties taken together), but simultaneously, decrease with increasing competition within specialties. We used multiple regression analyses controlling for high-user population, physician demographics and practice type. The evidence supports our hypotheses. Increasing total physician density (all specialties) is positively associated with earnings. Concurrently, within specialties, increased competition is associated with reduced earnings. The medical appropriateness of increasing health care utilization with increasing physician supply cannot be directly determined from the data. However, evidence of a steady earnings increase with increasing total physician density, which precludes a saturation point (of appropriate care levels) at some optimum physician density, substantiates SID in the office-based practice market. Empirically, our data suggest that the average market effect of physicians on one another is synergic when all specialties are considered together, but competitive within each specialty.",
keywords = "Competition, Physician earnings, Supplier-induced demand",
author = "Sudha Xirasagar and Lin, {Herng Ching}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1002/hpm.836",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "117--131",
journal = "International Journal of Health Planning and Management",
issn = "0749-6753",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician supply, supplier-induced demand and competition

T2 - Empirical evidence from a single-payer system

AU - Xirasagar, Sudha

AU - Lin, Herng Ching

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - We examined the earnings of 8106 office-based (FTE) physicians in 2002 in Taiwan for evidence of supplier-induced demand (SID). We hypothesize that SID, operating in the form of mutual cross-specialty referral, will cause earnings to increase with total physician density (all specialties taken together), but simultaneously, decrease with increasing competition within specialties. We used multiple regression analyses controlling for high-user population, physician demographics and practice type. The evidence supports our hypotheses. Increasing total physician density (all specialties) is positively associated with earnings. Concurrently, within specialties, increased competition is associated with reduced earnings. The medical appropriateness of increasing health care utilization with increasing physician supply cannot be directly determined from the data. However, evidence of a steady earnings increase with increasing total physician density, which precludes a saturation point (of appropriate care levels) at some optimum physician density, substantiates SID in the office-based practice market. Empirically, our data suggest that the average market effect of physicians on one another is synergic when all specialties are considered together, but competitive within each specialty.

AB - We examined the earnings of 8106 office-based (FTE) physicians in 2002 in Taiwan for evidence of supplier-induced demand (SID). We hypothesize that SID, operating in the form of mutual cross-specialty referral, will cause earnings to increase with total physician density (all specialties taken together), but simultaneously, decrease with increasing competition within specialties. We used multiple regression analyses controlling for high-user population, physician demographics and practice type. The evidence supports our hypotheses. Increasing total physician density (all specialties) is positively associated with earnings. Concurrently, within specialties, increased competition is associated with reduced earnings. The medical appropriateness of increasing health care utilization with increasing physician supply cannot be directly determined from the data. However, evidence of a steady earnings increase with increasing total physician density, which precludes a saturation point (of appropriate care levels) at some optimum physician density, substantiates SID in the office-based practice market. Empirically, our data suggest that the average market effect of physicians on one another is synergic when all specialties are considered together, but competitive within each specialty.

KW - Competition

KW - Physician earnings

KW - Supplier-induced demand

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745775672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745775672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hpm.836

DO - 10.1002/hpm.836

M3 - Article

C2 - 16846104

AN - SCOPUS:33745775672

VL - 21

SP - 117

EP - 131

JO - International Journal of Health Planning and Management

JF - International Journal of Health Planning and Management

SN - 0749-6753

IS - 2

ER -