Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus open tracheostomy - A prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Jackson Jer Kan Wu, Mu Shun Huang, Gau Jun Tang, Shin Chin Shih, Chih Chieh Yang, Wei Fong Kao, Min Hsiung Huang, Chen Hsen Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy has gained popularity, but its superiority to open tracheostomy is unclear. The object of this study was to compare procedure time, complication, safety and cost-effect between the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and the conventional open tracheotomy (OT). Methods. A prospective randomized clinic trial was conducted in a general Intensive Care Unit of an University-based hospital. Eighty-three consecutive patients who needed elective tracheostomies were selected for this study. PDT was performed using the Ciaglia method with OT as control group. Age, gender, operative data, complications and mortality were recorded for analysis. Results. The procedure time was 22.0 ± 12.1 minutes in PDT group, and 41.5 ± 5.9 minutes in OT group, with significant statistical difference (p <0.001). The incidences of complications were not different between both groups. Ages, gender or days of pre-tracheostomy intubation showed no difference between two groups. Conclusions. The PDT appears to be a simple, safe and time-saving bedside procedure. It can be recommended when an elective tracheostomy is needed in a critical patient.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-473
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Chinese Medical Association
Volume66
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tracheostomy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Tracheotomy
Intubation
Intensive Care Units
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis
Control Groups
Mortality
Incidence

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Critical care
  • Tracheostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Wu, J. J. K., Huang, M. S., Tang, G. J., Shih, S. C., Yang, C. C., Kao, W. F., ... Lee, C. H. (2003). Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus open tracheostomy - A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 66(8), 467-473.

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus open tracheostomy - A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. / Wu, Jackson Jer Kan; Huang, Mu Shun; Tang, Gau Jun; Shih, Shin Chin; Yang, Chih Chieh; Kao, Wei Fong; Huang, Min Hsiung; Lee, Chen Hsen.

In: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, Vol. 66, No. 8, 01.08.2003, p. 467-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wu, JJK, Huang, MS, Tang, GJ, Shih, SC, Yang, CC, Kao, WF, Huang, MH & Lee, CH 2003, 'Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus open tracheostomy - A prospective, randomized, controlled trial', Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 467-473.
Wu, Jackson Jer Kan ; Huang, Mu Shun ; Tang, Gau Jun ; Shih, Shin Chin ; Yang, Chih Chieh ; Kao, Wei Fong ; Huang, Min Hsiung ; Lee, Chen Hsen. / Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus open tracheostomy - A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. In: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2003 ; Vol. 66, No. 8. pp. 467-473.
@article{354a9708b9614d0c83cb906ab1c02f45,
title = "Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus open tracheostomy - A prospective, randomized, controlled trial",
abstract = "Background. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy has gained popularity, but its superiority to open tracheostomy is unclear. The object of this study was to compare procedure time, complication, safety and cost-effect between the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and the conventional open tracheotomy (OT). Methods. A prospective randomized clinic trial was conducted in a general Intensive Care Unit of an University-based hospital. Eighty-three consecutive patients who needed elective tracheostomies were selected for this study. PDT was performed using the Ciaglia method with OT as control group. Age, gender, operative data, complications and mortality were recorded for analysis. Results. The procedure time was 22.0 ± 12.1 minutes in PDT group, and 41.5 ± 5.9 minutes in OT group, with significant statistical difference (p <0.001). The incidences of complications were not different between both groups. Ages, gender or days of pre-tracheostomy intubation showed no difference between two groups. Conclusions. The PDT appears to be a simple, safe and time-saving bedside procedure. It can be recommended when an elective tracheostomy is needed in a critical patient.",
keywords = "Complications, Critical care, Tracheostomy",
author = "Wu, {Jackson Jer Kan} and Huang, {Mu Shun} and Tang, {Gau Jun} and Shih, {Shin Chin} and Yang, {Chih Chieh} and Kao, {Wei Fong} and Huang, {Min Hsiung} and Lee, {Chen Hsen}",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "467--473",
journal = "Journal of the Chinese Medical Association",
issn = "1726-4901",
publisher = "Elsevier Taiwan LLC",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus open tracheostomy - A prospective, randomized, controlled trial

AU - Wu, Jackson Jer Kan

AU - Huang, Mu Shun

AU - Tang, Gau Jun

AU - Shih, Shin Chin

AU - Yang, Chih Chieh

AU - Kao, Wei Fong

AU - Huang, Min Hsiung

AU - Lee, Chen Hsen

PY - 2003/8/1

Y1 - 2003/8/1

N2 - Background. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy has gained popularity, but its superiority to open tracheostomy is unclear. The object of this study was to compare procedure time, complication, safety and cost-effect between the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and the conventional open tracheotomy (OT). Methods. A prospective randomized clinic trial was conducted in a general Intensive Care Unit of an University-based hospital. Eighty-three consecutive patients who needed elective tracheostomies were selected for this study. PDT was performed using the Ciaglia method with OT as control group. Age, gender, operative data, complications and mortality were recorded for analysis. Results. The procedure time was 22.0 ± 12.1 minutes in PDT group, and 41.5 ± 5.9 minutes in OT group, with significant statistical difference (p <0.001). The incidences of complications were not different between both groups. Ages, gender or days of pre-tracheostomy intubation showed no difference between two groups. Conclusions. The PDT appears to be a simple, safe and time-saving bedside procedure. It can be recommended when an elective tracheostomy is needed in a critical patient.

AB - Background. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy has gained popularity, but its superiority to open tracheostomy is unclear. The object of this study was to compare procedure time, complication, safety and cost-effect between the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and the conventional open tracheotomy (OT). Methods. A prospective randomized clinic trial was conducted in a general Intensive Care Unit of an University-based hospital. Eighty-three consecutive patients who needed elective tracheostomies were selected for this study. PDT was performed using the Ciaglia method with OT as control group. Age, gender, operative data, complications and mortality were recorded for analysis. Results. The procedure time was 22.0 ± 12.1 minutes in PDT group, and 41.5 ± 5.9 minutes in OT group, with significant statistical difference (p <0.001). The incidences of complications were not different between both groups. Ages, gender or days of pre-tracheostomy intubation showed no difference between two groups. Conclusions. The PDT appears to be a simple, safe and time-saving bedside procedure. It can be recommended when an elective tracheostomy is needed in a critical patient.

KW - Complications

KW - Critical care

KW - Tracheostomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142061961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142061961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 467

EP - 473

JO - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association

SN - 1726-4901

IS - 8

ER -