Patient Utility Measurement for Managing Ureteral Stones: A Modified Standard Gamble Approach

Ching Yuan Fann, Po Chien Huang, Amy Ming Fang Yen, Hsiu Hsi Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To measure the utility of patients with ureteral stones under various medical regimes and to identify significant factors affecting utility for various health states. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to measure the utility of 89 patients on each health state related to the clinical management of ureteral stones. Health states with respect to intervention and treatment modalities were classified into the acute phase (including medication, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, and surgery) and the chronic phase (no specific intervention, lifestyle modification, maintenance with surveillance, and continued medication). Utility was measured by using the modified standard gamble. Demographic data and relevant history of treatment modalities and interventions for ureteral stones were collected by using a questionnaire. Results: Utility scores of health states in the acute phase (ranging from 0.914 [surgery] to 0.967 [extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy]) were lower than those in the chronic phase (ranging from 0.955 [maintenance with surveillance] to 0.974 [lifestyle modification]). Utility for surgery was lower than for nonsurgical methods. Utilities for the two lithotripsy modalities were close to that for medication. The utility figures for health states in the chronic phase were the highest for lifestyle modification, but the differences across health states were trivial. Sex, history of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, education level, and employment were significant covariates in the final multiple linear regression model. Conclusions:A modified standard gamble chained method was applied to measure the utility for health states in relation to the clinical management of ureteral stones. Patients preferred nonsurgical treatment over surgical treatment and hemodialysis regardless of health states. We also found that sex, a history of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, education level, and employment affected utility for health states related to clinical management. Our findings provide an insight into patient preference for the choice of treatment of ureteral stones.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-92
Number of pages6
JournalValue in Health Regional Issues
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Lithotripsy
Health
Life Style
Linear Models
Maintenance
Therapeutics
Education
Standard gamble
Utility measurement
Acute-Phase Reaction
Health state
Patient Preference
Renal Dialysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Demography
Medication
Surgery
Lifestyle

Keywords

  • Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
  • Standard gamble approach
  • Ureteral stones
  • Ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy
  • Utility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Patient Utility Measurement for Managing Ureteral Stones : A Modified Standard Gamble Approach. / Fann, Ching Yuan; Huang, Po Chien; Yen, Amy Ming Fang; Chen, Hsiu Hsi.

In: Value in Health Regional Issues, Vol. 1, No. 1, 05.2012, p. 87-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d5814eb0371e431eb57e35d4b22b238c,
title = "Patient Utility Measurement for Managing Ureteral Stones: A Modified Standard Gamble Approach",
abstract = "Objectives: To measure the utility of patients with ureteral stones under various medical regimes and to identify significant factors affecting utility for various health states. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to measure the utility of 89 patients on each health state related to the clinical management of ureteral stones. Health states with respect to intervention and treatment modalities were classified into the acute phase (including medication, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, and surgery) and the chronic phase (no specific intervention, lifestyle modification, maintenance with surveillance, and continued medication). Utility was measured by using the modified standard gamble. Demographic data and relevant history of treatment modalities and interventions for ureteral stones were collected by using a questionnaire. Results: Utility scores of health states in the acute phase (ranging from 0.914 [surgery] to 0.967 [extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy]) were lower than those in the chronic phase (ranging from 0.955 [maintenance with surveillance] to 0.974 [lifestyle modification]). Utility for surgery was lower than for nonsurgical methods. Utilities for the two lithotripsy modalities were close to that for medication. The utility figures for health states in the chronic phase were the highest for lifestyle modification, but the differences across health states were trivial. Sex, history of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, education level, and employment were significant covariates in the final multiple linear regression model. Conclusions:A modified standard gamble chained method was applied to measure the utility for health states in relation to the clinical management of ureteral stones. Patients preferred nonsurgical treatment over surgical treatment and hemodialysis regardless of health states. We also found that sex, a history of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, education level, and employment affected utility for health states related to clinical management. Our findings provide an insight into patient preference for the choice of treatment of ureteral stones.",
keywords = "Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Standard gamble approach, Ureteral stones, Ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, Utility",
author = "Fann, {Ching Yuan} and Huang, {Po Chien} and Yen, {Amy Ming Fang} and Chen, {Hsiu Hsi}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.004",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "87--92",
journal = "Value in Health Regional Issues",
issn = "2212-1099",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient Utility Measurement for Managing Ureteral Stones

T2 - A Modified Standard Gamble Approach

AU - Fann, Ching Yuan

AU - Huang, Po Chien

AU - Yen, Amy Ming Fang

AU - Chen, Hsiu Hsi

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Objectives: To measure the utility of patients with ureteral stones under various medical regimes and to identify significant factors affecting utility for various health states. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to measure the utility of 89 patients on each health state related to the clinical management of ureteral stones. Health states with respect to intervention and treatment modalities were classified into the acute phase (including medication, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, and surgery) and the chronic phase (no specific intervention, lifestyle modification, maintenance with surveillance, and continued medication). Utility was measured by using the modified standard gamble. Demographic data and relevant history of treatment modalities and interventions for ureteral stones were collected by using a questionnaire. Results: Utility scores of health states in the acute phase (ranging from 0.914 [surgery] to 0.967 [extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy]) were lower than those in the chronic phase (ranging from 0.955 [maintenance with surveillance] to 0.974 [lifestyle modification]). Utility for surgery was lower than for nonsurgical methods. Utilities for the two lithotripsy modalities were close to that for medication. The utility figures for health states in the chronic phase were the highest for lifestyle modification, but the differences across health states were trivial. Sex, history of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, education level, and employment were significant covariates in the final multiple linear regression model. Conclusions:A modified standard gamble chained method was applied to measure the utility for health states in relation to the clinical management of ureteral stones. Patients preferred nonsurgical treatment over surgical treatment and hemodialysis regardless of health states. We also found that sex, a history of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, education level, and employment affected utility for health states related to clinical management. Our findings provide an insight into patient preference for the choice of treatment of ureteral stones.

AB - Objectives: To measure the utility of patients with ureteral stones under various medical regimes and to identify significant factors affecting utility for various health states. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to measure the utility of 89 patients on each health state related to the clinical management of ureteral stones. Health states with respect to intervention and treatment modalities were classified into the acute phase (including medication, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, and surgery) and the chronic phase (no specific intervention, lifestyle modification, maintenance with surveillance, and continued medication). Utility was measured by using the modified standard gamble. Demographic data and relevant history of treatment modalities and interventions for ureteral stones were collected by using a questionnaire. Results: Utility scores of health states in the acute phase (ranging from 0.914 [surgery] to 0.967 [extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy]) were lower than those in the chronic phase (ranging from 0.955 [maintenance with surveillance] to 0.974 [lifestyle modification]). Utility for surgery was lower than for nonsurgical methods. Utilities for the two lithotripsy modalities were close to that for medication. The utility figures for health states in the chronic phase were the highest for lifestyle modification, but the differences across health states were trivial. Sex, history of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, education level, and employment were significant covariates in the final multiple linear regression model. Conclusions:A modified standard gamble chained method was applied to measure the utility for health states in relation to the clinical management of ureteral stones. Patients preferred nonsurgical treatment over surgical treatment and hemodialysis regardless of health states. We also found that sex, a history of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy, education level, and employment affected utility for health states related to clinical management. Our findings provide an insight into patient preference for the choice of treatment of ureteral stones.

KW - Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

KW - Standard gamble approach

KW - Ureteral stones

KW - Ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy

KW - Utility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868266979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868266979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84868266979

VL - 1

SP - 87

EP - 92

JO - Value in Health Regional Issues

JF - Value in Health Regional Issues

SN - 2212-1099

IS - 1

ER -