Patient preferences for diabetes-related complications in Taiwan

Yi Ju Lin, Chin Yuan Wang, Ssu Wei Cheng, Yu Ko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: As the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) continues to increase rapidly, there has been a rising need not only to assess the clinical outcomes but also the impact of DM on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of affected individuals. Most previous studies have found that having complications is strongly associated with decreased HRQoL in DM patients. As such, it is crucial to measure individuals’ preferences for DM-related complications in order to assess the magnitude of complications’ effect on overall HRQoL. In addition, preference scores are an essential component of cost–utility analyses (CUAs), which studies can incorporate healthcare costs, HRQoL and clinical outcomes of DM into one analysis. Objective: The aims of this study were to assess the preference scores of DM-related complications using both the standard gamble (SG), a choice-based method, and visual analogue scale (VAS), a scaling method. We also aimed to assess several possible factors that might be associated with the preference scores of the complications. Methods: This is a cross-sectional interview-administered survey, and 213 patients with type 2 DM were interviewed. The respondents’ preference scores of eleven DM-related complications were obtained using VAS and SG techniques. Demographic information, clinical characteristics and risk attitudes were also collected to explore factors that may affect patients’ preference scores. Results: Nearly one quarter of participants in Taiwan ranked at least one of the complications worse than death. The mean VAS scores ranged from 0.004 (amputation) to 0.47 (nocturnal hypoglycemia) while the mean adjusted SG scores ranged from 0.30 (blindness) to 0.66 (nocturnal hypoglycemia). There were significant differences in all of the complications’ preference scores depending on risk attitudes. Conclusion: Both the VAS and SG methods were used to elicit the preference scores of DM-related complications, and the preference scores derived could be useful for future cost utility analyses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Medical Research and Opinion
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - May 25 2018

Fingerprint

Patient Preference
Diabetes Complications
Taiwan
Diabetes Mellitus
Visual Analog Scale
Quality of Life
Hypoglycemia
Blindness
Amputation
Health Care Costs
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Demography
Interviews

Keywords

  • Diabetes mellitus
  • DM complications
  • preference assessment
  • standard gamble
  • Taiwan
  • visual analogue scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Patient preferences for diabetes-related complications in Taiwan. / Lin, Yi Ju; Wang, Chin Yuan; Cheng, Ssu Wei; Ko, Yu.

In: Current Medical Research and Opinion, 25.05.2018, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a9df8fa63e6d421b957111c03c5c48c9,
title = "Patient preferences for diabetes-related complications in Taiwan",
abstract = "Background: As the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) continues to increase rapidly, there has been a rising need not only to assess the clinical outcomes but also the impact of DM on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of affected individuals. Most previous studies have found that having complications is strongly associated with decreased HRQoL in DM patients. As such, it is crucial to measure individuals’ preferences for DM-related complications in order to assess the magnitude of complications’ effect on overall HRQoL. In addition, preference scores are an essential component of cost–utility analyses (CUAs), which studies can incorporate healthcare costs, HRQoL and clinical outcomes of DM into one analysis. Objective: The aims of this study were to assess the preference scores of DM-related complications using both the standard gamble (SG), a choice-based method, and visual analogue scale (VAS), a scaling method. We also aimed to assess several possible factors that might be associated with the preference scores of the complications. Methods: This is a cross-sectional interview-administered survey, and 213 patients with type 2 DM were interviewed. The respondents’ preference scores of eleven DM-related complications were obtained using VAS and SG techniques. Demographic information, clinical characteristics and risk attitudes were also collected to explore factors that may affect patients’ preference scores. Results: Nearly one quarter of participants in Taiwan ranked at least one of the complications worse than death. The mean VAS scores ranged from 0.004 (amputation) to 0.47 (nocturnal hypoglycemia) while the mean adjusted SG scores ranged from 0.30 (blindness) to 0.66 (nocturnal hypoglycemia). There were significant differences in all of the complications’ preference scores depending on risk attitudes. Conclusion: Both the VAS and SG methods were used to elicit the preference scores of DM-related complications, and the preference scores derived could be useful for future cost utility analyses.",
keywords = "Diabetes mellitus, DM complications, preference assessment, standard gamble, Taiwan, visual analogue scale, Diabetes mellitus, DM complications, preference assessment, standard gamble, Taiwan, visual analogue scale",
author = "Lin, {Yi Ju} and Wang, {Chin Yuan} and Cheng, {Ssu Wei} and Yu Ko",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1080/03007995.2018.1470970",
language = "English",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Current Medical Research and Opinion",
issn = "0300-7995",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient preferences for diabetes-related complications in Taiwan

AU - Lin, Yi Ju

AU - Wang, Chin Yuan

AU - Cheng, Ssu Wei

AU - Ko, Yu

PY - 2018/5/25

Y1 - 2018/5/25

N2 - Background: As the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) continues to increase rapidly, there has been a rising need not only to assess the clinical outcomes but also the impact of DM on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of affected individuals. Most previous studies have found that having complications is strongly associated with decreased HRQoL in DM patients. As such, it is crucial to measure individuals’ preferences for DM-related complications in order to assess the magnitude of complications’ effect on overall HRQoL. In addition, preference scores are an essential component of cost–utility analyses (CUAs), which studies can incorporate healthcare costs, HRQoL and clinical outcomes of DM into one analysis. Objective: The aims of this study were to assess the preference scores of DM-related complications using both the standard gamble (SG), a choice-based method, and visual analogue scale (VAS), a scaling method. We also aimed to assess several possible factors that might be associated with the preference scores of the complications. Methods: This is a cross-sectional interview-administered survey, and 213 patients with type 2 DM were interviewed. The respondents’ preference scores of eleven DM-related complications were obtained using VAS and SG techniques. Demographic information, clinical characteristics and risk attitudes were also collected to explore factors that may affect patients’ preference scores. Results: Nearly one quarter of participants in Taiwan ranked at least one of the complications worse than death. The mean VAS scores ranged from 0.004 (amputation) to 0.47 (nocturnal hypoglycemia) while the mean adjusted SG scores ranged from 0.30 (blindness) to 0.66 (nocturnal hypoglycemia). There were significant differences in all of the complications’ preference scores depending on risk attitudes. Conclusion: Both the VAS and SG methods were used to elicit the preference scores of DM-related complications, and the preference scores derived could be useful for future cost utility analyses.

AB - Background: As the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) continues to increase rapidly, there has been a rising need not only to assess the clinical outcomes but also the impact of DM on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of affected individuals. Most previous studies have found that having complications is strongly associated with decreased HRQoL in DM patients. As such, it is crucial to measure individuals’ preferences for DM-related complications in order to assess the magnitude of complications’ effect on overall HRQoL. In addition, preference scores are an essential component of cost–utility analyses (CUAs), which studies can incorporate healthcare costs, HRQoL and clinical outcomes of DM into one analysis. Objective: The aims of this study were to assess the preference scores of DM-related complications using both the standard gamble (SG), a choice-based method, and visual analogue scale (VAS), a scaling method. We also aimed to assess several possible factors that might be associated with the preference scores of the complications. Methods: This is a cross-sectional interview-administered survey, and 213 patients with type 2 DM were interviewed. The respondents’ preference scores of eleven DM-related complications were obtained using VAS and SG techniques. Demographic information, clinical characteristics and risk attitudes were also collected to explore factors that may affect patients’ preference scores. Results: Nearly one quarter of participants in Taiwan ranked at least one of the complications worse than death. The mean VAS scores ranged from 0.004 (amputation) to 0.47 (nocturnal hypoglycemia) while the mean adjusted SG scores ranged from 0.30 (blindness) to 0.66 (nocturnal hypoglycemia). There were significant differences in all of the complications’ preference scores depending on risk attitudes. Conclusion: Both the VAS and SG methods were used to elicit the preference scores of DM-related complications, and the preference scores derived could be useful for future cost utility analyses.

KW - Diabetes mellitus

KW - DM complications

KW - preference assessment

KW - standard gamble

KW - Taiwan

KW - visual analogue scale

KW - Diabetes mellitus

KW - DM complications

KW - preference assessment

KW - standard gamble

KW - Taiwan

KW - visual analogue scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047401278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047401278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03007995.2018.1470970

DO - 10.1080/03007995.2018.1470970

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047401278

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Current Medical Research and Opinion

JF - Current Medical Research and Opinion

SN - 0300-7995

ER -