Overview of potential procedural and participant-related confounds for neuroimaging of the resting state

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of intrinsic brain activity in the resting state have become increasingly common. A productive discussion of what analysis methods are appropriate, of the importance of physiologic correction and of the potential interpretations of results has been ongoing. However, less attention has been paid to factors other than physiologic noise that may confound resting-state experiments. These range from straightforward factors, such as ensuring that participants are all instructed in the same manner, to more obscure participant-related factors, such as body weight. We provide an overview of such potentially confounding factors, along with some suggested approaches for minimizing their impact. A particular theme that emerges from the overview is the range of systematic differences between types of study groups (e.g., between patients and controls) that may influence resting-state study results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-96
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neuroimaging
Noise
Body Weight
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{c1687a7ef82c42efb6dad8017bdcdecc,
title = "Overview of potential procedural and participant-related confounds for neuroimaging of the resting state",
abstract = "Studies of intrinsic brain activity in the resting state have become increasingly common. A productive discussion of what analysis methods are appropriate, of the importance of physiologic correction and of the potential interpretations of results has been ongoing. However, less attention has been paid to factors other than physiologic noise that may confound resting-state experiments. These range from straightforward factors, such as ensuring that participants are all instructed in the same manner, to more obscure participant-related factors, such as body weight. We provide an overview of such potentially confounding factors, along with some suggested approaches for minimizing their impact. A particular theme that emerges from the overview is the range of systematic differences between types of study groups (e.g., between patients and controls) that may influence resting-state study results.",
author = "Duncan, {Niall W.} and Georg Northoff",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1503/jpn.120059",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "84--96",
journal = "Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience",
issn = "1180-4882",
publisher = "Canadian Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overview of potential procedural and participant-related confounds for neuroimaging of the resting state

AU - Duncan, Niall W.

AU - Northoff, Georg

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Studies of intrinsic brain activity in the resting state have become increasingly common. A productive discussion of what analysis methods are appropriate, of the importance of physiologic correction and of the potential interpretations of results has been ongoing. However, less attention has been paid to factors other than physiologic noise that may confound resting-state experiments. These range from straightforward factors, such as ensuring that participants are all instructed in the same manner, to more obscure participant-related factors, such as body weight. We provide an overview of such potentially confounding factors, along with some suggested approaches for minimizing their impact. A particular theme that emerges from the overview is the range of systematic differences between types of study groups (e.g., between patients and controls) that may influence resting-state study results.

AB - Studies of intrinsic brain activity in the resting state have become increasingly common. A productive discussion of what analysis methods are appropriate, of the importance of physiologic correction and of the potential interpretations of results has been ongoing. However, less attention has been paid to factors other than physiologic noise that may confound resting-state experiments. These range from straightforward factors, such as ensuring that participants are all instructed in the same manner, to more obscure participant-related factors, such as body weight. We provide an overview of such potentially confounding factors, along with some suggested approaches for minimizing their impact. A particular theme that emerges from the overview is the range of systematic differences between types of study groups (e.g., between patients and controls) that may influence resting-state study results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874314730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874314730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1503/jpn.120059

DO - 10.1503/jpn.120059

M3 - Article

C2 - 22964258

AN - SCOPUS:84874314730

VL - 38

SP - 84

EP - 96

JO - Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience

SN - 1180-4882

IS - 2

ER -