Outcomes of an emergency department intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan

An observational study

Jo Chi Tseng, Chih Huang Li, Kuan Fu Chen, Yi Ling Chan, Shy Shin Chang, Feng Lin Wang, Te Fa Chiu, Jih Chang Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The boarding of critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED) could reduce quality of care and increase mortality. An ED intensive care unit (ICU) was set up in a 3715-bed medical center to facilitate timely delivery of critical care. This study reports comparative outcomes of EDICU patients with specialty ICU patients. Materials and methods: Medical records of adult nontrauma ED patients admitted to nonsurgical ICUs (EDICU, medical, cardiac, alimentary, and neurological units) between January 2007 and July 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The respective number of admissions, bed turnover rate, and length of stay were compared. Cox regression models were also applied to compare inhospital mortality risks among these patients. Results: With only 13% (14/108) of all ICU beds, EDICU admitted 36% (3711/10. 449) of patients. Emergency department ICU patients had an unfavorable adjusted hazard ratio for inhospital mortality compared with medical ICU and cardiac ICU patients, but after excluding patients with an ICU length of stay of 2. days or less, the difference in hazard ratio became nonsignificant. Conclusions: Emergency department ICU has admitted a disproportionately higher proportion of patients without sacrificing quality of care. Specialty care could be secured through direct communication between EDICU and specialty physicians and forming close collaboration between departments and ICUs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)444-448
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Taiwan
Observational Studies
Intensive Care Units
Hospital Emergency Service
Quality of Health Care
Hospital Mortality
Length of Stay
Critical Care
Proportional Hazards Models
Critical Illness
Medical Records
Communication
Physicians
Mortality

Keywords

  • Boarding
  • Critically ill patients
  • Emergency department
  • Hazard ratio
  • In-hospital mortality
  • Intensive care unit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Outcomes of an emergency department intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan : An observational study. / Tseng, Jo Chi; Li, Chih Huang; Chen, Kuan Fu; Chan, Yi Ling; Chang, Shy Shin; Wang, Feng Lin; Chiu, Te Fa; Chen, Jih Chang.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.06.2015, p. 444-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tseng, Jo Chi ; Li, Chih Huang ; Chen, Kuan Fu ; Chan, Yi Ling ; Chang, Shy Shin ; Wang, Feng Lin ; Chiu, Te Fa ; Chen, Jih Chang. / Outcomes of an emergency department intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan : An observational study. In: Journal of Critical Care. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 444-448.
@article{49902fcdc44a4254918e579ac40cc643,
title = "Outcomes of an emergency department intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan: An observational study",
abstract = "Purpose: The boarding of critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED) could reduce quality of care and increase mortality. An ED intensive care unit (ICU) was set up in a 3715-bed medical center to facilitate timely delivery of critical care. This study reports comparative outcomes of EDICU patients with specialty ICU patients. Materials and methods: Medical records of adult nontrauma ED patients admitted to nonsurgical ICUs (EDICU, medical, cardiac, alimentary, and neurological units) between January 2007 and July 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The respective number of admissions, bed turnover rate, and length of stay were compared. Cox regression models were also applied to compare inhospital mortality risks among these patients. Results: With only 13{\%} (14/108) of all ICU beds, EDICU admitted 36{\%} (3711/10. 449) of patients. Emergency department ICU patients had an unfavorable adjusted hazard ratio for inhospital mortality compared with medical ICU and cardiac ICU patients, but after excluding patients with an ICU length of stay of 2. days or less, the difference in hazard ratio became nonsignificant. Conclusions: Emergency department ICU has admitted a disproportionately higher proportion of patients without sacrificing quality of care. Specialty care could be secured through direct communication between EDICU and specialty physicians and forming close collaboration between departments and ICUs.",
keywords = "Boarding, Critically ill patients, Emergency department, Hazard ratio, In-hospital mortality, Intensive care unit",
author = "Tseng, {Jo Chi} and Li, {Chih Huang} and Chen, {Kuan Fu} and Chan, {Yi Ling} and Chang, {Shy Shin} and Wang, {Feng Lin} and Chiu, {Te Fa} and Chen, {Jih Chang}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.01.010",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "444--448",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of an emergency department intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan

T2 - An observational study

AU - Tseng, Jo Chi

AU - Li, Chih Huang

AU - Chen, Kuan Fu

AU - Chan, Yi Ling

AU - Chang, Shy Shin

AU - Wang, Feng Lin

AU - Chiu, Te Fa

AU - Chen, Jih Chang

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Purpose: The boarding of critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED) could reduce quality of care and increase mortality. An ED intensive care unit (ICU) was set up in a 3715-bed medical center to facilitate timely delivery of critical care. This study reports comparative outcomes of EDICU patients with specialty ICU patients. Materials and methods: Medical records of adult nontrauma ED patients admitted to nonsurgical ICUs (EDICU, medical, cardiac, alimentary, and neurological units) between January 2007 and July 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The respective number of admissions, bed turnover rate, and length of stay were compared. Cox regression models were also applied to compare inhospital mortality risks among these patients. Results: With only 13% (14/108) of all ICU beds, EDICU admitted 36% (3711/10. 449) of patients. Emergency department ICU patients had an unfavorable adjusted hazard ratio for inhospital mortality compared with medical ICU and cardiac ICU patients, but after excluding patients with an ICU length of stay of 2. days or less, the difference in hazard ratio became nonsignificant. Conclusions: Emergency department ICU has admitted a disproportionately higher proportion of patients without sacrificing quality of care. Specialty care could be secured through direct communication between EDICU and specialty physicians and forming close collaboration between departments and ICUs.

AB - Purpose: The boarding of critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED) could reduce quality of care and increase mortality. An ED intensive care unit (ICU) was set up in a 3715-bed medical center to facilitate timely delivery of critical care. This study reports comparative outcomes of EDICU patients with specialty ICU patients. Materials and methods: Medical records of adult nontrauma ED patients admitted to nonsurgical ICUs (EDICU, medical, cardiac, alimentary, and neurological units) between January 2007 and July 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The respective number of admissions, bed turnover rate, and length of stay were compared. Cox regression models were also applied to compare inhospital mortality risks among these patients. Results: With only 13% (14/108) of all ICU beds, EDICU admitted 36% (3711/10. 449) of patients. Emergency department ICU patients had an unfavorable adjusted hazard ratio for inhospital mortality compared with medical ICU and cardiac ICU patients, but after excluding patients with an ICU length of stay of 2. days or less, the difference in hazard ratio became nonsignificant. Conclusions: Emergency department ICU has admitted a disproportionately higher proportion of patients without sacrificing quality of care. Specialty care could be secured through direct communication between EDICU and specialty physicians and forming close collaboration between departments and ICUs.

KW - Boarding

KW - Critically ill patients

KW - Emergency department

KW - Hazard ratio

KW - In-hospital mortality

KW - Intensive care unit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928585392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928585392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.01.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.01.010

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 444

EP - 448

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

IS - 3

ER -