Outcome analysis of unstable posterior ring injury of the pelvis: Comparison between percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation and conservative treatment

Po Han Chen, Wei Hsiu Hsu, Yen Yao Li, Tsan Wen Huang, Tsung Jen Huang, Kuo Ti Peng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Unstable posterior ring injuries of the pelvis are a challenge to pelvic surgeons, and their treatment has been controversial. The functional outcomes of such injuries following either percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation or conservative treatment remain to be elucidated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 32 consecutive patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries who were treated with percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws (group 1) or conservative means (group 2) from January 2002 to September 2009. Radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes were compared between the two treatment groups. Results: Patients who underwent percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation after pelvic trauma had better functional results than those treated conservatively, as per the Majeed grading system. In addition, patients in group 1 demonstrated better results for general health and mental health on the 36 item Short Form Health Status Survey. Patients in group 1 also demonstrated less residual displacement on radiography at 1 year follow up than those in group 2. Finally, patients in group 1 had better pain relief at 1 month and 1 year follow ups than those in group 2. Conclusions: Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries results in less residual displacement at medium term follow up, and better pain relief at short and medium term follow up, than does conservative treatment. Better functional outcomes were observed at 1 year follow up as compared with conservative treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-294
Number of pages6
JournalBiomedical Journal
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pelvis
Wounds and Injuries
Pain
Health Surveys
Radiography
Health Status
Mental Health
Conservative Treatment
Health
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • pelvic ring injury
  • pelvis fracture
  • Percutaneous iliosacral screws
  • sacrum fracture sacroiliac joint disruption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Outcome analysis of unstable posterior ring injury of the pelvis : Comparison between percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation and conservative treatment. / Chen, Po Han; Hsu, Wei Hsiu; Li, Yen Yao; Huang, Tsan Wen; Huang, Tsung Jen; Peng, Kuo Ti.

In: Biomedical Journal, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2013, p. 289-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{19d911cbb6e944cf8bd671212cdfb4a4,
title = "Outcome analysis of unstable posterior ring injury of the pelvis: Comparison between percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation and conservative treatment",
abstract = "Background: Unstable posterior ring injuries of the pelvis are a challenge to pelvic surgeons, and their treatment has been controversial. The functional outcomes of such injuries following either percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation or conservative treatment remain to be elucidated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 32 consecutive patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries who were treated with percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws (group 1) or conservative means (group 2) from January 2002 to September 2009. Radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes were compared between the two treatment groups. Results: Patients who underwent percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation after pelvic trauma had better functional results than those treated conservatively, as per the Majeed grading system. In addition, patients in group 1 demonstrated better results for general health and mental health on the 36 item Short Form Health Status Survey. Patients in group 1 also demonstrated less residual displacement on radiography at 1 year follow up than those in group 2. Finally, patients in group 1 had better pain relief at 1 month and 1 year follow ups than those in group 2. Conclusions: Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries results in less residual displacement at medium term follow up, and better pain relief at short and medium term follow up, than does conservative treatment. Better functional outcomes were observed at 1 year follow up as compared with conservative treatment.",
keywords = "pelvic ring injury, pelvis fracture, Percutaneous iliosacral screws, sacrum fracture sacroiliac joint disruption",
author = "Chen, {Po Han} and Hsu, {Wei Hsiu} and Li, {Yen Yao} and Huang, {Tsan Wen} and Huang, {Tsung Jen} and Peng, {Kuo Ti}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.4103/2319-4170.112757",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "289--294",
journal = "Biomedical Journal",
issn = "2319-4170",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcome analysis of unstable posterior ring injury of the pelvis

T2 - Comparison between percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation and conservative treatment

AU - Chen, Po Han

AU - Hsu, Wei Hsiu

AU - Li, Yen Yao

AU - Huang, Tsan Wen

AU - Huang, Tsung Jen

AU - Peng, Kuo Ti

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: Unstable posterior ring injuries of the pelvis are a challenge to pelvic surgeons, and their treatment has been controversial. The functional outcomes of such injuries following either percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation or conservative treatment remain to be elucidated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 32 consecutive patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries who were treated with percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws (group 1) or conservative means (group 2) from January 2002 to September 2009. Radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes were compared between the two treatment groups. Results: Patients who underwent percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation after pelvic trauma had better functional results than those treated conservatively, as per the Majeed grading system. In addition, patients in group 1 demonstrated better results for general health and mental health on the 36 item Short Form Health Status Survey. Patients in group 1 also demonstrated less residual displacement on radiography at 1 year follow up than those in group 2. Finally, patients in group 1 had better pain relief at 1 month and 1 year follow ups than those in group 2. Conclusions: Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries results in less residual displacement at medium term follow up, and better pain relief at short and medium term follow up, than does conservative treatment. Better functional outcomes were observed at 1 year follow up as compared with conservative treatment.

AB - Background: Unstable posterior ring injuries of the pelvis are a challenge to pelvic surgeons, and their treatment has been controversial. The functional outcomes of such injuries following either percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation or conservative treatment remain to be elucidated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 32 consecutive patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries who were treated with percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws (group 1) or conservative means (group 2) from January 2002 to September 2009. Radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes were compared between the two treatment groups. Results: Patients who underwent percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation after pelvic trauma had better functional results than those treated conservatively, as per the Majeed grading system. In addition, patients in group 1 demonstrated better results for general health and mental health on the 36 item Short Form Health Status Survey. Patients in group 1 also demonstrated less residual displacement on radiography at 1 year follow up than those in group 2. Finally, patients in group 1 had better pain relief at 1 month and 1 year follow ups than those in group 2. Conclusions: Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries results in less residual displacement at medium term follow up, and better pain relief at short and medium term follow up, than does conservative treatment. Better functional outcomes were observed at 1 year follow up as compared with conservative treatment.

KW - pelvic ring injury

KW - pelvis fracture

KW - Percutaneous iliosacral screws

KW - sacrum fracture sacroiliac joint disruption

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891877892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891877892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/2319-4170.112757

DO - 10.4103/2319-4170.112757

M3 - Article

C2 - 24385071

AN - SCOPUS:84891877892

VL - 36

SP - 289

EP - 294

JO - Biomedical Journal

JF - Biomedical Journal

SN - 2319-4170

IS - 6

ER -