Osteoarthritis of the knee

Comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging to assess extent and severity

Wing P. Chan, P. Lang, M. P. Stevens, K. Sack, S. Majumdar, D. W. Stoller, C. Basch, H. K. Genant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

182 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although conventional radiography is the method most frequently used for monitoring progression of osteoarthritis, it may not show osteoarthritic changes of the knee until late in the disease, and it may show involvement of only one or two compartments in patients who have tricompartmental disease. We compared radiography, CT, and MR imaging for assessing the extent and severity of osteoarthritis of the knee in 20 patients. Radiography included posteroanterior weight-bearing, true lateral, and sunrise patellar projections. Axial CT scans were reformatted in sagittal and coronal planes. MR imaging consisted of spin-echo (600-800/20; 2000/60, 120 [TR/TE]), and gradient-echo (600/30, θ = 30°) sequences. The severity of osteoarthritic changes was graded from 0 to 3. MR frequently showed tricompartmental cartilage loss when radiography and CT showed only bicompartmental involvement in the medial and patellofemoral compartments. In the lateral compartment, MR showed a higher prevalence of cartilage loss (60%) than radiography (35%) and CT (25%) did. In the medial compartment, CT and MR showed osteophytes in 100% of the knees, whereas radiography showed osteophytes in only 60%. Notably, radiography often failed to show osteophytes in the posterior medial femoral condyle. On MR images, meniscal degeneration or tears were found in all 20 knees studied. Partial and complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament were found in three and seven patients, respectively. MR is more sensitive than radiography and CT for assessing the extent and severity of osteoarthritic changes and frequently shows tricompartmental disease in patients in whom radiography and CT show only bicompartmental involvement. MR imaging is unique for evaluating meniscal and ligamentous disease related to osteoarthritis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)799-806
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume157
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Knee Osteoarthritis
Radiography
Osteophyte
Knee
Osteoarthritis
Cartilage
Weight-Bearing
Thigh
Tears
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Chan, W. P., Lang, P., Stevens, M. P., Sack, K., Majumdar, S., Stoller, D. W., ... Genant, H. K. (1991). Osteoarthritis of the knee: Comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging to assess extent and severity. American Journal of Roentgenology, 157(4), 799-806.

Osteoarthritis of the knee : Comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging to assess extent and severity. / Chan, Wing P.; Lang, P.; Stevens, M. P.; Sack, K.; Majumdar, S.; Stoller, D. W.; Basch, C.; Genant, H. K.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 157, No. 4, 1991, p. 799-806.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chan, WP, Lang, P, Stevens, MP, Sack, K, Majumdar, S, Stoller, DW, Basch, C & Genant, HK 1991, 'Osteoarthritis of the knee: Comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging to assess extent and severity', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 799-806.
Chan, Wing P. ; Lang, P. ; Stevens, M. P. ; Sack, K. ; Majumdar, S. ; Stoller, D. W. ; Basch, C. ; Genant, H. K. / Osteoarthritis of the knee : Comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging to assess extent and severity. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1991 ; Vol. 157, No. 4. pp. 799-806.
@article{ae35d0951901437aae45ffd3244475e5,
title = "Osteoarthritis of the knee: Comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging to assess extent and severity",
abstract = "Although conventional radiography is the method most frequently used for monitoring progression of osteoarthritis, it may not show osteoarthritic changes of the knee until late in the disease, and it may show involvement of only one or two compartments in patients who have tricompartmental disease. We compared radiography, CT, and MR imaging for assessing the extent and severity of osteoarthritis of the knee in 20 patients. Radiography included posteroanterior weight-bearing, true lateral, and sunrise patellar projections. Axial CT scans were reformatted in sagittal and coronal planes. MR imaging consisted of spin-echo (600-800/20; 2000/60, 120 [TR/TE]), and gradient-echo (600/30, θ = 30°) sequences. The severity of osteoarthritic changes was graded from 0 to 3. MR frequently showed tricompartmental cartilage loss when radiography and CT showed only bicompartmental involvement in the medial and patellofemoral compartments. In the lateral compartment, MR showed a higher prevalence of cartilage loss (60{\%}) than radiography (35{\%}) and CT (25{\%}) did. In the medial compartment, CT and MR showed osteophytes in 100{\%} of the knees, whereas radiography showed osteophytes in only 60{\%}. Notably, radiography often failed to show osteophytes in the posterior medial femoral condyle. On MR images, meniscal degeneration or tears were found in all 20 knees studied. Partial and complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament were found in three and seven patients, respectively. MR is more sensitive than radiography and CT for assessing the extent and severity of osteoarthritic changes and frequently shows tricompartmental disease in patients in whom radiography and CT show only bicompartmental involvement. MR imaging is unique for evaluating meniscal and ligamentous disease related to osteoarthritis.",
author = "Chan, {Wing P.} and P. Lang and Stevens, {M. P.} and K. Sack and S. Majumdar and Stoller, {D. W.} and C. Basch and Genant, {H. K.}",
year = "1991",
language = "English",
volume = "157",
pages = "799--806",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Osteoarthritis of the knee

T2 - Comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging to assess extent and severity

AU - Chan, Wing P.

AU - Lang, P.

AU - Stevens, M. P.

AU - Sack, K.

AU - Majumdar, S.

AU - Stoller, D. W.

AU - Basch, C.

AU - Genant, H. K.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Although conventional radiography is the method most frequently used for monitoring progression of osteoarthritis, it may not show osteoarthritic changes of the knee until late in the disease, and it may show involvement of only one or two compartments in patients who have tricompartmental disease. We compared radiography, CT, and MR imaging for assessing the extent and severity of osteoarthritis of the knee in 20 patients. Radiography included posteroanterior weight-bearing, true lateral, and sunrise patellar projections. Axial CT scans were reformatted in sagittal and coronal planes. MR imaging consisted of spin-echo (600-800/20; 2000/60, 120 [TR/TE]), and gradient-echo (600/30, θ = 30°) sequences. The severity of osteoarthritic changes was graded from 0 to 3. MR frequently showed tricompartmental cartilage loss when radiography and CT showed only bicompartmental involvement in the medial and patellofemoral compartments. In the lateral compartment, MR showed a higher prevalence of cartilage loss (60%) than radiography (35%) and CT (25%) did. In the medial compartment, CT and MR showed osteophytes in 100% of the knees, whereas radiography showed osteophytes in only 60%. Notably, radiography often failed to show osteophytes in the posterior medial femoral condyle. On MR images, meniscal degeneration or tears were found in all 20 knees studied. Partial and complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament were found in three and seven patients, respectively. MR is more sensitive than radiography and CT for assessing the extent and severity of osteoarthritic changes and frequently shows tricompartmental disease in patients in whom radiography and CT show only bicompartmental involvement. MR imaging is unique for evaluating meniscal and ligamentous disease related to osteoarthritis.

AB - Although conventional radiography is the method most frequently used for monitoring progression of osteoarthritis, it may not show osteoarthritic changes of the knee until late in the disease, and it may show involvement of only one or two compartments in patients who have tricompartmental disease. We compared radiography, CT, and MR imaging for assessing the extent and severity of osteoarthritis of the knee in 20 patients. Radiography included posteroanterior weight-bearing, true lateral, and sunrise patellar projections. Axial CT scans were reformatted in sagittal and coronal planes. MR imaging consisted of spin-echo (600-800/20; 2000/60, 120 [TR/TE]), and gradient-echo (600/30, θ = 30°) sequences. The severity of osteoarthritic changes was graded from 0 to 3. MR frequently showed tricompartmental cartilage loss when radiography and CT showed only bicompartmental involvement in the medial and patellofemoral compartments. In the lateral compartment, MR showed a higher prevalence of cartilage loss (60%) than radiography (35%) and CT (25%) did. In the medial compartment, CT and MR showed osteophytes in 100% of the knees, whereas radiography showed osteophytes in only 60%. Notably, radiography often failed to show osteophytes in the posterior medial femoral condyle. On MR images, meniscal degeneration or tears were found in all 20 knees studied. Partial and complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament were found in three and seven patients, respectively. MR is more sensitive than radiography and CT for assessing the extent and severity of osteoarthritic changes and frequently shows tricompartmental disease in patients in whom radiography and CT show only bicompartmental involvement. MR imaging is unique for evaluating meniscal and ligamentous disease related to osteoarthritis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025951806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025951806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 157

SP - 799

EP - 806

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 4

ER -