Orthodontic bonding with self-etching primer and self-adhesive systems

Chi Hung Chu, Ken Liang Ou, De Rei Dong, Haw Ming Huang, Hung Huey Tsai, Wei Nan Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using conventional multi-step adhesive, self-etching primer (SEP), which combines etching and priming into a single step, and self-adhesive systems, which combine etchant, primer, and adhesive. Metal brackets were bonded to 90 extracted human premolars according to three experimental protocols: group 1, conventional multi-step adhesive system; group 2, SEP; and group 3, self-adhesive system. All specimens were debonded using an Instron universal machine and failures between the tooth surface and bracket base were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bracket bases were then analysed by mapping of energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometry to calculate the distributive percentages of enamel or resin. The bond strength, percentage distribution, and calcium on the debonded interface were determined and analysed by one-way analysis of variance, and means were ranked by a Tukey interval, calculated at the 95 per cent confidence level.Group 1 produced the greatest bond strength, followed by groups 2 and 3. Group 3 showed the highest debonded interface between resin and enamel or within the resin itself, followed by groups 2 and 1. Groups 1 and 2 displayed significantly more debond failures at the interface between the bracket and the resin than group 3. More calcium particles were observed on the bracket base after debonding in group 3 than in groups 2 and 1. The simplified bonding procedures caused an undesirable decrease in tensile bond strength.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276-281
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Orthodontics
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Orthodontics
Adhesives
Dental Enamel
Tensile Strength
Orthodontic Brackets
X-Ray Emission Spectrometry
Calcium
Bicuspid
Electron Scanning Microscopy
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Metals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics

Cite this

Orthodontic bonding with self-etching primer and self-adhesive systems. / Chu, Chi Hung; Ou, Ken Liang; Dong, De Rei; Huang, Haw Ming; Tsai, Hung Huey; Wang, Wei Nan.

In: European Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 06.2011, p. 276-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chu, Chi Hung ; Ou, Ken Liang ; Dong, De Rei ; Huang, Haw Ming ; Tsai, Hung Huey ; Wang, Wei Nan. / Orthodontic bonding with self-etching primer and self-adhesive systems. In: European Journal of Orthodontics. 2011 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 276-281.
@article{9ce78c2674b542ea8e5b8fe2407b22a5,
title = "Orthodontic bonding with self-etching primer and self-adhesive systems",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using conventional multi-step adhesive, self-etching primer (SEP), which combines etching and priming into a single step, and self-adhesive systems, which combine etchant, primer, and adhesive. Metal brackets were bonded to 90 extracted human premolars according to three experimental protocols: group 1, conventional multi-step adhesive system; group 2, SEP; and group 3, self-adhesive system. All specimens were debonded using an Instron universal machine and failures between the tooth surface and bracket base were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bracket bases were then analysed by mapping of energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometry to calculate the distributive percentages of enamel or resin. The bond strength, percentage distribution, and calcium on the debonded interface were determined and analysed by one-way analysis of variance, and means were ranked by a Tukey interval, calculated at the 95 per cent confidence level.Group 1 produced the greatest bond strength, followed by groups 2 and 3. Group 3 showed the highest debonded interface between resin and enamel or within the resin itself, followed by groups 2 and 1. Groups 1 and 2 displayed significantly more debond failures at the interface between the bracket and the resin than group 3. More calcium particles were observed on the bracket base after debonding in group 3 than in groups 2 and 1. The simplified bonding procedures caused an undesirable decrease in tensile bond strength.",
author = "Chu, {Chi Hung} and Ou, {Ken Liang} and Dong, {De Rei} and Huang, {Haw Ming} and Tsai, {Hung Huey} and Wang, {Wei Nan}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1093/ejo/cjq073",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "276--281",
journal = "European Journal of Orthodontics",
issn = "0141-5387",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orthodontic bonding with self-etching primer and self-adhesive systems

AU - Chu, Chi Hung

AU - Ou, Ken Liang

AU - Dong, De Rei

AU - Huang, Haw Ming

AU - Tsai, Hung Huey

AU - Wang, Wei Nan

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using conventional multi-step adhesive, self-etching primer (SEP), which combines etching and priming into a single step, and self-adhesive systems, which combine etchant, primer, and adhesive. Metal brackets were bonded to 90 extracted human premolars according to three experimental protocols: group 1, conventional multi-step adhesive system; group 2, SEP; and group 3, self-adhesive system. All specimens were debonded using an Instron universal machine and failures between the tooth surface and bracket base were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bracket bases were then analysed by mapping of energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometry to calculate the distributive percentages of enamel or resin. The bond strength, percentage distribution, and calcium on the debonded interface were determined and analysed by one-way analysis of variance, and means were ranked by a Tukey interval, calculated at the 95 per cent confidence level.Group 1 produced the greatest bond strength, followed by groups 2 and 3. Group 3 showed the highest debonded interface between resin and enamel or within the resin itself, followed by groups 2 and 1. Groups 1 and 2 displayed significantly more debond failures at the interface between the bracket and the resin than group 3. More calcium particles were observed on the bracket base after debonding in group 3 than in groups 2 and 1. The simplified bonding procedures caused an undesirable decrease in tensile bond strength.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using conventional multi-step adhesive, self-etching primer (SEP), which combines etching and priming into a single step, and self-adhesive systems, which combine etchant, primer, and adhesive. Metal brackets were bonded to 90 extracted human premolars according to three experimental protocols: group 1, conventional multi-step adhesive system; group 2, SEP; and group 3, self-adhesive system. All specimens were debonded using an Instron universal machine and failures between the tooth surface and bracket base were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bracket bases were then analysed by mapping of energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometry to calculate the distributive percentages of enamel or resin. The bond strength, percentage distribution, and calcium on the debonded interface were determined and analysed by one-way analysis of variance, and means were ranked by a Tukey interval, calculated at the 95 per cent confidence level.Group 1 produced the greatest bond strength, followed by groups 2 and 3. Group 3 showed the highest debonded interface between resin and enamel or within the resin itself, followed by groups 2 and 1. Groups 1 and 2 displayed significantly more debond failures at the interface between the bracket and the resin than group 3. More calcium particles were observed on the bracket base after debonding in group 3 than in groups 2 and 1. The simplified bonding procedures caused an undesirable decrease in tensile bond strength.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957856154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957856154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ejo/cjq073

DO - 10.1093/ejo/cjq073

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 276

EP - 281

JO - European Journal of Orthodontics

JF - European Journal of Orthodontics

SN - 0141-5387

IS - 3

ER -