One-shot percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation vs. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for low back pain

Comparison of therapeutic effects

Ru Lan Hsieh, Wen Chung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effects of one shot of low-frequency percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation vs. one shot of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with low back pain. Design: In total, 133 low back pain patients were recruited for this randomized, control study. Group 1 patients received medication only. Group 2 patients received medication plus one shot of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Group 3 patients received medication plus one shot of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Therapeutic effects were measured using a visual analog scale, body surface score, pain pressure threshold, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Results: Immediately after one-shot treatment, the visual analog scale improved 1.53 units and the body surface score improved 3.06 units in the percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group. In the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group, the visual analog scale improved 1.50 units and the body surface score improved 3.98 units. The improvements did not differ between the two groups. There were no differences in improvement at 3 days or 1 wk after the treatment among the three groups. Conclusions: Simple one-shot treatment with percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation provided immediate pain relief for low back pain patients. One-shot transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment is recommended due to the rarity of side effects and its convenient application.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)838-843
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume81
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Therapeutic Uses
Low Back Pain
Visual Analog Scale
Pain Threshold
Quebec
Therapeutics
Back Pain
Pressure
Pain

Keywords

  • Low Back Pain
  • Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
  • Physical Therapy
  • Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{ef87c7c5da6b46bdabbfd2f578d02e94,
title = "One-shot percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation vs. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for low back pain: Comparison of therapeutic effects",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effects of one shot of low-frequency percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation vs. one shot of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with low back pain. Design: In total, 133 low back pain patients were recruited for this randomized, control study. Group 1 patients received medication only. Group 2 patients received medication plus one shot of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Group 3 patients received medication plus one shot of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Therapeutic effects were measured using a visual analog scale, body surface score, pain pressure threshold, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Results: Immediately after one-shot treatment, the visual analog scale improved 1.53 units and the body surface score improved 3.06 units in the percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group. In the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group, the visual analog scale improved 1.50 units and the body surface score improved 3.98 units. The improvements did not differ between the two groups. There were no differences in improvement at 3 days or 1 wk after the treatment among the three groups. Conclusions: Simple one-shot treatment with percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation provided immediate pain relief for low back pain patients. One-shot transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment is recommended due to the rarity of side effects and its convenient application.",
keywords = "Low Back Pain, Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Physical Therapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation",
author = "Hsieh, {Ru Lan} and Lee, {Wen Chung}",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00002060-200211000-00006",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "838--843",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - One-shot percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation vs. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for low back pain

T2 - Comparison of therapeutic effects

AU - Hsieh, Ru Lan

AU - Lee, Wen Chung

PY - 2002/11/1

Y1 - 2002/11/1

N2 - Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effects of one shot of low-frequency percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation vs. one shot of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with low back pain. Design: In total, 133 low back pain patients were recruited for this randomized, control study. Group 1 patients received medication only. Group 2 patients received medication plus one shot of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Group 3 patients received medication plus one shot of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Therapeutic effects were measured using a visual analog scale, body surface score, pain pressure threshold, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Results: Immediately after one-shot treatment, the visual analog scale improved 1.53 units and the body surface score improved 3.06 units in the percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group. In the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group, the visual analog scale improved 1.50 units and the body surface score improved 3.98 units. The improvements did not differ between the two groups. There were no differences in improvement at 3 days or 1 wk after the treatment among the three groups. Conclusions: Simple one-shot treatment with percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation provided immediate pain relief for low back pain patients. One-shot transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment is recommended due to the rarity of side effects and its convenient application.

AB - Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effects of one shot of low-frequency percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation vs. one shot of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with low back pain. Design: In total, 133 low back pain patients were recruited for this randomized, control study. Group 1 patients received medication only. Group 2 patients received medication plus one shot of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Group 3 patients received medication plus one shot of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Therapeutic effects were measured using a visual analog scale, body surface score, pain pressure threshold, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Results: Immediately after one-shot treatment, the visual analog scale improved 1.53 units and the body surface score improved 3.06 units in the percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group. In the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group, the visual analog scale improved 1.50 units and the body surface score improved 3.98 units. The improvements did not differ between the two groups. There were no differences in improvement at 3 days or 1 wk after the treatment among the three groups. Conclusions: Simple one-shot treatment with percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation provided immediate pain relief for low back pain patients. One-shot transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment is recommended due to the rarity of side effects and its convenient application.

KW - Low Back Pain

KW - Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

KW - Physical Therapy

KW - Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036838344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036838344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00002060-200211000-00006

DO - 10.1097/00002060-200211000-00006

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 838

EP - 843

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 11

ER -