On Sinhala subject case marking and A-movement

Chao-Ting Chou, Sujeewa Hettiarachchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The relation between volitive/involitive moods of Sinhala verbs and subject case marking remains unresolved in the scarce generative literature on Sinhala. Previous analyses of subject case marking in this language (Gair, 1990a,b; Inman, 1992; Beavers and Zubair, 2010, 2013) assume that non-nominative cases are lexical/inherent/quirky cases assigned by involitive verbs to the subject NP, whereas nominative case is not tied to any particular lexical semantics, and arises as the default case when the semantic conditions for all available quirky cases fail. We argue that the distinction between nominative and non-nominaive cases in Sinhala should not be characterized as one between default and lexical/inherent/quirky cases. Rather, based on previously unnoted data, we contend that (i) nominative case in Sinhala is a structural case assigned by a finite T, and (ii) A-movement in Sinhala is driven by case valuation (see Epstein and Seely, 2006; Bošković, 2002, 2007), rather than by a universal EPP structural requirement on T (contra Gair, 1990a,b; see Chomsky, 2000, 2001).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-40
Number of pages24
JournalLingua
Volume177
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 16 2013

Fingerprint

semantics
mood
language
Quirky Case
Case Marking
Verbs
Nominative Case
literature
Nominative
Noam Chomsky
Mood
Generative
Lexical Semantics
Language
Beaver

Keywords

  • (In)volitives
  • A-movement
  • EPP
  • Lexical case
  • Sinhala
  • Structural case

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

On Sinhala subject case marking and A-movement. / Chou, Chao-Ting; Hettiarachchi, Sujeewa.

In: Lingua, Vol. 177, 16.09.2013, p. 17-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chou, Chao-Ting ; Hettiarachchi, Sujeewa. / On Sinhala subject case marking and A-movement. In: Lingua. 2013 ; Vol. 177. pp. 17-40.
@article{1a27e97df31040a4b5bdf4d5b9f7cc30,
title = "On Sinhala subject case marking and A-movement",
abstract = "The relation between volitive/involitive moods of Sinhala verbs and subject case marking remains unresolved in the scarce generative literature on Sinhala. Previous analyses of subject case marking in this language (Gair, 1990a,b; Inman, 1992; Beavers and Zubair, 2010, 2013) assume that non-nominative cases are lexical/inherent/quirky cases assigned by involitive verbs to the subject NP, whereas nominative case is not tied to any particular lexical semantics, and arises as the default case when the semantic conditions for all available quirky cases fail. We argue that the distinction between nominative and non-nominaive cases in Sinhala should not be characterized as one between default and lexical/inherent/quirky cases. Rather, based on previously unnoted data, we contend that (i) nominative case in Sinhala is a structural case assigned by a finite T, and (ii) A-movement in Sinhala is driven by case valuation (see Epstein and Seely, 2006; Bošković, 2002, 2007), rather than by a universal EPP structural requirement on T (contra Gair, 1990a,b; see Chomsky, 2000, 2001).",
keywords = "(In)volitives, A-movement, EPP, Lexical case, Sinhala, Structural case",
author = "Chao-Ting Chou and Sujeewa Hettiarachchi",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.012",
language = "English",
volume = "177",
pages = "17--40",
journal = "Lingua",
issn = "0024-3841",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On Sinhala subject case marking and A-movement

AU - Chou, Chao-Ting

AU - Hettiarachchi, Sujeewa

PY - 2013/9/16

Y1 - 2013/9/16

N2 - The relation between volitive/involitive moods of Sinhala verbs and subject case marking remains unresolved in the scarce generative literature on Sinhala. Previous analyses of subject case marking in this language (Gair, 1990a,b; Inman, 1992; Beavers and Zubair, 2010, 2013) assume that non-nominative cases are lexical/inherent/quirky cases assigned by involitive verbs to the subject NP, whereas nominative case is not tied to any particular lexical semantics, and arises as the default case when the semantic conditions for all available quirky cases fail. We argue that the distinction between nominative and non-nominaive cases in Sinhala should not be characterized as one between default and lexical/inherent/quirky cases. Rather, based on previously unnoted data, we contend that (i) nominative case in Sinhala is a structural case assigned by a finite T, and (ii) A-movement in Sinhala is driven by case valuation (see Epstein and Seely, 2006; Bošković, 2002, 2007), rather than by a universal EPP structural requirement on T (contra Gair, 1990a,b; see Chomsky, 2000, 2001).

AB - The relation between volitive/involitive moods of Sinhala verbs and subject case marking remains unresolved in the scarce generative literature on Sinhala. Previous analyses of subject case marking in this language (Gair, 1990a,b; Inman, 1992; Beavers and Zubair, 2010, 2013) assume that non-nominative cases are lexical/inherent/quirky cases assigned by involitive verbs to the subject NP, whereas nominative case is not tied to any particular lexical semantics, and arises as the default case when the semantic conditions for all available quirky cases fail. We argue that the distinction between nominative and non-nominaive cases in Sinhala should not be characterized as one between default and lexical/inherent/quirky cases. Rather, based on previously unnoted data, we contend that (i) nominative case in Sinhala is a structural case assigned by a finite T, and (ii) A-movement in Sinhala is driven by case valuation (see Epstein and Seely, 2006; Bošković, 2002, 2007), rather than by a universal EPP structural requirement on T (contra Gair, 1990a,b; see Chomsky, 2000, 2001).

KW - (In)volitives

KW - A-movement

KW - EPP

KW - Lexical case

KW - Sinhala

KW - Structural case

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960158393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960158393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.012

DO - 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.012

M3 - Article

VL - 177

SP - 17

EP - 40

JO - Lingua

JF - Lingua

SN - 0024-3841

ER -