Nursing process decision support system for urology ward

Angelica Te Hui Hao, Li-Bin Wu, Ajit Kumar, Wen Shan Jian, Li Fang Huang, Ching Chiu Kao, Chien-Yeh Hsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We developed a nursing process decision support system (NPDSS) based on three clinical pathways, including benign prostatic hypertrophy, inguinal hernia, and urinary tract stone. NPDSS included six major nursing diagnoses - acute pain, impaired urinary elimination, impaired skin integrity, anxiety, infection risk, and risk of falling. This paper aims to describe the design, development and validation process of the NPDSS. Methods: We deployed the Delphi method to reach consensus for decision support rules of NPDSS. A team of nine-member expert nurses from a medical center in Taiwan was involved in Delphi method. The Cronbach's α method was used for examining the reliability of the questionnaire used in the Delphi method. The Visual Basic 6.0 as front-end and Microsoft Access 2003 as back-end was used to develop the system. A team of six nursing experts was asked to evaluate the usability of the developed systems. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was used for the evaluation. The sensitivity and specificity of NPDSS were validated using 150 nursing chart. Results: The study showed a consistency between the diagnoses of the developed system (NPDSS) and the nursing charts. The sensitivities of the nursing diagnoses including acute pain, impaired urinary elimination, risk of infection, and risk of falling were 96.9%, 98.1%, 94.9%, and 89.9% respectively; and the specificities were 88%, 49.5%, 62%, and 88% respectively. We did not calculate the sensitivity and specificity of impaired skin integrity and anxiety due to non-availability of enough sample size. Conclusions: NPDSS can help nurses in decision making of nursing diagnoses. Besides, it can help them to generate nursing diagnoses based on patient-specific data, individualized care plans, and implementation within their usual nursing workflow.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)604-612
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume82
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Nursing Process
Urology
Nursing Diagnosis
Accidental Falls
Nursing
Acute Pain
Anxiety
Nurses
Team Nursing
Sensitivity and Specificity
Skin
Urinary Calculi
Critical Pathways
Workflow
Inguinal Hernia
Prostatic Hyperplasia
Infection
Taiwan
Sample Size
Consensus

Keywords

  • Clinical pathway
  • Decision support system
  • Nursing process
  • Taiwan
  • Urology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Nursing process decision support system for urology ward. / Hao, Angelica Te Hui; Wu, Li-Bin; Kumar, Ajit; Jian, Wen Shan; Huang, Li Fang; Kao, Ching Chiu; Hsu, Chien-Yeh.

In: International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 82, No. 7, 07.2013, p. 604-612.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hao, Angelica Te Hui ; Wu, Li-Bin ; Kumar, Ajit ; Jian, Wen Shan ; Huang, Li Fang ; Kao, Ching Chiu ; Hsu, Chien-Yeh. / Nursing process decision support system for urology ward. In: International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2013 ; Vol. 82, No. 7. pp. 604-612.
@article{dc23417c466e4d3caf0980b16897a978,
title = "Nursing process decision support system for urology ward",
abstract = "Purpose: We developed a nursing process decision support system (NPDSS) based on three clinical pathways, including benign prostatic hypertrophy, inguinal hernia, and urinary tract stone. NPDSS included six major nursing diagnoses - acute pain, impaired urinary elimination, impaired skin integrity, anxiety, infection risk, and risk of falling. This paper aims to describe the design, development and validation process of the NPDSS. Methods: We deployed the Delphi method to reach consensus for decision support rules of NPDSS. A team of nine-member expert nurses from a medical center in Taiwan was involved in Delphi method. The Cronbach's α method was used for examining the reliability of the questionnaire used in the Delphi method. The Visual Basic 6.0 as front-end and Microsoft Access 2003 as back-end was used to develop the system. A team of six nursing experts was asked to evaluate the usability of the developed systems. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was used for the evaluation. The sensitivity and specificity of NPDSS were validated using 150 nursing chart. Results: The study showed a consistency between the diagnoses of the developed system (NPDSS) and the nursing charts. The sensitivities of the nursing diagnoses including acute pain, impaired urinary elimination, risk of infection, and risk of falling were 96.9{\%}, 98.1{\%}, 94.9{\%}, and 89.9{\%} respectively; and the specificities were 88{\%}, 49.5{\%}, 62{\%}, and 88{\%} respectively. We did not calculate the sensitivity and specificity of impaired skin integrity and anxiety due to non-availability of enough sample size. Conclusions: NPDSS can help nurses in decision making of nursing diagnoses. Besides, it can help them to generate nursing diagnoses based on patient-specific data, individualized care plans, and implementation within their usual nursing workflow.",
keywords = "Clinical pathway, Decision support system, Nursing process, Taiwan, Urology, Clinical pathway, Decision support system, Nursing process, Taiwan, Urology",
author = "Hao, {Angelica Te Hui} and Li-Bin Wu and Ajit Kumar and Jian, {Wen Shan} and Huang, {Li Fang} and Kao, {Ching Chiu} and Chien-Yeh Hsu",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.02.006",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "604--612",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Informatics",
issn = "1386-5056",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nursing process decision support system for urology ward

AU - Hao, Angelica Te Hui

AU - Wu, Li-Bin

AU - Kumar, Ajit

AU - Jian, Wen Shan

AU - Huang, Li Fang

AU - Kao, Ching Chiu

AU - Hsu, Chien-Yeh

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Purpose: We developed a nursing process decision support system (NPDSS) based on three clinical pathways, including benign prostatic hypertrophy, inguinal hernia, and urinary tract stone. NPDSS included six major nursing diagnoses - acute pain, impaired urinary elimination, impaired skin integrity, anxiety, infection risk, and risk of falling. This paper aims to describe the design, development and validation process of the NPDSS. Methods: We deployed the Delphi method to reach consensus for decision support rules of NPDSS. A team of nine-member expert nurses from a medical center in Taiwan was involved in Delphi method. The Cronbach's α method was used for examining the reliability of the questionnaire used in the Delphi method. The Visual Basic 6.0 as front-end and Microsoft Access 2003 as back-end was used to develop the system. A team of six nursing experts was asked to evaluate the usability of the developed systems. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was used for the evaluation. The sensitivity and specificity of NPDSS were validated using 150 nursing chart. Results: The study showed a consistency between the diagnoses of the developed system (NPDSS) and the nursing charts. The sensitivities of the nursing diagnoses including acute pain, impaired urinary elimination, risk of infection, and risk of falling were 96.9%, 98.1%, 94.9%, and 89.9% respectively; and the specificities were 88%, 49.5%, 62%, and 88% respectively. We did not calculate the sensitivity and specificity of impaired skin integrity and anxiety due to non-availability of enough sample size. Conclusions: NPDSS can help nurses in decision making of nursing diagnoses. Besides, it can help them to generate nursing diagnoses based on patient-specific data, individualized care plans, and implementation within their usual nursing workflow.

AB - Purpose: We developed a nursing process decision support system (NPDSS) based on three clinical pathways, including benign prostatic hypertrophy, inguinal hernia, and urinary tract stone. NPDSS included six major nursing diagnoses - acute pain, impaired urinary elimination, impaired skin integrity, anxiety, infection risk, and risk of falling. This paper aims to describe the design, development and validation process of the NPDSS. Methods: We deployed the Delphi method to reach consensus for decision support rules of NPDSS. A team of nine-member expert nurses from a medical center in Taiwan was involved in Delphi method. The Cronbach's α method was used for examining the reliability of the questionnaire used in the Delphi method. The Visual Basic 6.0 as front-end and Microsoft Access 2003 as back-end was used to develop the system. A team of six nursing experts was asked to evaluate the usability of the developed systems. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was used for the evaluation. The sensitivity and specificity of NPDSS were validated using 150 nursing chart. Results: The study showed a consistency between the diagnoses of the developed system (NPDSS) and the nursing charts. The sensitivities of the nursing diagnoses including acute pain, impaired urinary elimination, risk of infection, and risk of falling were 96.9%, 98.1%, 94.9%, and 89.9% respectively; and the specificities were 88%, 49.5%, 62%, and 88% respectively. We did not calculate the sensitivity and specificity of impaired skin integrity and anxiety due to non-availability of enough sample size. Conclusions: NPDSS can help nurses in decision making of nursing diagnoses. Besides, it can help them to generate nursing diagnoses based on patient-specific data, individualized care plans, and implementation within their usual nursing workflow.

KW - Clinical pathway

KW - Decision support system

KW - Nursing process

KW - Taiwan

KW - Urology

KW - Clinical pathway

KW - Decision support system

KW - Nursing process

KW - Taiwan

KW - Urology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878977408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878977408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.02.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 23523383

AN - SCOPUS:84878977408

VL - 82

SP - 604

EP - 612

JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics

JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics

SN - 1386-5056

IS - 7

ER -