Non-elastic taping, but not elastic taping, provides benefits for patients with knee osteoarthritis: systemic review and meta-analysis

Jin Han Ouyang, Kwang Hwa Chang, Wen Yen Hsu, Yen Ting Cho, Tsan Hon Liou, Yen Nung Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether therapeutic taping, which includes elastic (Kinesio tape) and non-elastic (Leukotape) taping, is superior to control taping in improving pain and functions for patients with knee arthritis. To understand whether both elastic and non-elastic taping are beneficial. Methods: We searched the PubMed and Scopus databases from their earliest record to 31 May 2017 for randomized controlled and cross-over studies that used taping to treat knee osteoarthritis. We extracted the mean differences and SD between baseline and posttreatment for selected outcomes measured in the experimental and control groups for subsequent meta-analyses. Results: In total, 11 studies were included in the review. Of which, five Leukotaping and five Kinesio taping studies involving 379 participants were used in the meta-analysis. PEDro scores of the Leukotaping and Kinesio taping studies were 4.2 and 7.8, respectively. Overall, therapeutic taping exhibited significantly greater pain reduction than control taping with a significant weighted mean difference of 12.8 mm on a 0- to 100-mm visual analogue scale. Compared to control taping, Leukotaping produced a significant weighted mean difference of 11.6 mm regarding pain with a large effect size of 0.89 and I2 = 0%, while Kinesio taping produced a non-significant weighted mean difference of 12.1 mm and I2 = 93%. Leukotaping also exhibited a large and significant standard mean difference of 0.82, while Kinesio taping exhibited a non-significant standard mean difference of 1.34 regarding climbing stairs and stepping. Conclusion: Therapeutic taping seemed to be superior to control taping in pain control for knee osteoarthritis. Non-elastic taping, but not elastic taping, provides benefits in pain reduction and functional performance.

LanguageEnglish
Pages3-17
Number of pages15
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Knee Osteoarthritis
Meta-Analysis
Pain
Visual Analog Scale
PubMed
Cross-Over Studies
Arthritis
Knee
Therapeutics
Databases
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Kinesio
  • osteoarthritis
  • Patellofemoral
  • tape
  • tibiofemoral

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Non-elastic taping, but not elastic taping, provides benefits for patients with knee osteoarthritis : systemic review and meta-analysis. / Ouyang, Jin Han; Chang, Kwang Hwa; Hsu, Wen Yen; Cho, Yen Ting; Liou, Tsan Hon; Lin, Yen Nung.

In: Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 3-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5066a5f8b45c4f75ad87fb498c7fab04,
title = "Non-elastic taping, but not elastic taping, provides benefits for patients with knee osteoarthritis: systemic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether therapeutic taping, which includes elastic (Kinesio tape) and non-elastic (Leukotape) taping, is superior to control taping in improving pain and functions for patients with knee arthritis. To understand whether both elastic and non-elastic taping are beneficial. Methods: We searched the PubMed and Scopus databases from their earliest record to 31 May 2017 for randomized controlled and cross-over studies that used taping to treat knee osteoarthritis. We extracted the mean differences and SD between baseline and posttreatment for selected outcomes measured in the experimental and control groups for subsequent meta-analyses. Results: In total, 11 studies were included in the review. Of which, five Leukotaping and five Kinesio taping studies involving 379 participants were used in the meta-analysis. PEDro scores of the Leukotaping and Kinesio taping studies were 4.2 and 7.8, respectively. Overall, therapeutic taping exhibited significantly greater pain reduction than control taping with a significant weighted mean difference of 12.8 mm on a 0- to 100-mm visual analogue scale. Compared to control taping, Leukotaping produced a significant weighted mean difference of 11.6 mm regarding pain with a large effect size of 0.89 and I2 = 0{\%}, while Kinesio taping produced a non-significant weighted mean difference of 12.1 mm and I2 = 93{\%}. Leukotaping also exhibited a large and significant standard mean difference of 0.82, while Kinesio taping exhibited a non-significant standard mean difference of 1.34 regarding climbing stairs and stepping. Conclusion: Therapeutic taping seemed to be superior to control taping in pain control for knee osteoarthritis. Non-elastic taping, but not elastic taping, provides benefits in pain reduction and functional performance.",
keywords = "Kinesio, osteoarthritis, Patellofemoral, tape, tibiofemoral",
author = "Ouyang, {Jin Han} and Chang, {Kwang Hwa} and Hsu, {Wen Yen} and Cho, {Yen Ting} and Liou, {Tsan Hon} and Lin, {Yen Nung}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269215517717307",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "3--17",
journal = "Clinical Rehabilitation",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-elastic taping, but not elastic taping, provides benefits for patients with knee osteoarthritis

T2 - Clinical Rehabilitation

AU - Ouyang,Jin Han

AU - Chang,Kwang Hwa

AU - Hsu,Wen Yen

AU - Cho,Yen Ting

AU - Liou,Tsan Hon

AU - Lin,Yen Nung

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: To determine whether therapeutic taping, which includes elastic (Kinesio tape) and non-elastic (Leukotape) taping, is superior to control taping in improving pain and functions for patients with knee arthritis. To understand whether both elastic and non-elastic taping are beneficial. Methods: We searched the PubMed and Scopus databases from their earliest record to 31 May 2017 for randomized controlled and cross-over studies that used taping to treat knee osteoarthritis. We extracted the mean differences and SD between baseline and posttreatment for selected outcomes measured in the experimental and control groups for subsequent meta-analyses. Results: In total, 11 studies were included in the review. Of which, five Leukotaping and five Kinesio taping studies involving 379 participants were used in the meta-analysis. PEDro scores of the Leukotaping and Kinesio taping studies were 4.2 and 7.8, respectively. Overall, therapeutic taping exhibited significantly greater pain reduction than control taping with a significant weighted mean difference of 12.8 mm on a 0- to 100-mm visual analogue scale. Compared to control taping, Leukotaping produced a significant weighted mean difference of 11.6 mm regarding pain with a large effect size of 0.89 and I2 = 0%, while Kinesio taping produced a non-significant weighted mean difference of 12.1 mm and I2 = 93%. Leukotaping also exhibited a large and significant standard mean difference of 0.82, while Kinesio taping exhibited a non-significant standard mean difference of 1.34 regarding climbing stairs and stepping. Conclusion: Therapeutic taping seemed to be superior to control taping in pain control for knee osteoarthritis. Non-elastic taping, but not elastic taping, provides benefits in pain reduction and functional performance.

AB - Objective: To determine whether therapeutic taping, which includes elastic (Kinesio tape) and non-elastic (Leukotape) taping, is superior to control taping in improving pain and functions for patients with knee arthritis. To understand whether both elastic and non-elastic taping are beneficial. Methods: We searched the PubMed and Scopus databases from their earliest record to 31 May 2017 for randomized controlled and cross-over studies that used taping to treat knee osteoarthritis. We extracted the mean differences and SD between baseline and posttreatment for selected outcomes measured in the experimental and control groups for subsequent meta-analyses. Results: In total, 11 studies were included in the review. Of which, five Leukotaping and five Kinesio taping studies involving 379 participants were used in the meta-analysis. PEDro scores of the Leukotaping and Kinesio taping studies were 4.2 and 7.8, respectively. Overall, therapeutic taping exhibited significantly greater pain reduction than control taping with a significant weighted mean difference of 12.8 mm on a 0- to 100-mm visual analogue scale. Compared to control taping, Leukotaping produced a significant weighted mean difference of 11.6 mm regarding pain with a large effect size of 0.89 and I2 = 0%, while Kinesio taping produced a non-significant weighted mean difference of 12.1 mm and I2 = 93%. Leukotaping also exhibited a large and significant standard mean difference of 0.82, while Kinesio taping exhibited a non-significant standard mean difference of 1.34 regarding climbing stairs and stepping. Conclusion: Therapeutic taping seemed to be superior to control taping in pain control for knee osteoarthritis. Non-elastic taping, but not elastic taping, provides benefits in pain reduction and functional performance.

KW - Kinesio

KW - osteoarthritis

KW - Patellofemoral

KW - tape

KW - tibiofemoral

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038599527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038599527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0269215517717307

DO - 10.1177/0269215517717307

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 3

EP - 17

JO - Clinical Rehabilitation

JF - Clinical Rehabilitation

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 1

ER -