New electrocardiographic criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter

Correlation with electrophysiological study and radiofrequency catheter ablation

L. P. Lai, J. L. Lin, L. J. Lin, W. J. Chen, Y. L. Ho, Y. Z. Tseng, C. H. Chen, Y. T. Lee, W. P. Lien, S. K.S. Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective-To develop new electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters. Background-Traditionally, the EGG differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters is based on the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads. However, determination of flutter wave polarity is subjective and sometimes difficult, especially in flutter waves of undulating pattern. Patients-The study comprised 37 consecutive patients with drug resistant atrial flutter; 30 had counterclockwise and 17 had clockwise atrial flutter (10 had both forms of atrial flutter). The isthmus dependence was confirmed by entrainment study and catheter ablation. The EGG patterns of both types of atrial flutter were compared and the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads was determined by four independent cardiologists. Results-The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads appeared negative in 24, positive in one, and equivocal in five of the counterclockwise atrial flutters; polarity appeared negative in one, positive in 10, and equivocal in six of the clockwise atrial flutters. However, the aVF/lead I flutter wave amplitude ratio was > 2.5 in all counterclockwise but < 2.5 in all clockwise atrial flutters. The flutter wave nadirs in the inferior leads corresponded to the upstrokes in V1 in all counterclockwise atrial flutters, but corresponded to the downstrokes in V1 in all clockwise atrial flutters. Conclusions-The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads does not correlate well with the flutter wave rotating direction. However, counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters can be differentiated by new ECG criteria with high accuracy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-85
Number of pages6
JournalHeart
Volume80
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Atrial Flutter
Catheter Ablation
Ovum

Keywords

  • Atrial flutter
  • Electrocardiography
  • Radiofrequency catheter ablation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

New electrocardiographic criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter : Correlation with electrophysiological study and radiofrequency catheter ablation. / Lai, L. P.; Lin, J. L.; Lin, L. J.; Chen, W. J.; Ho, Y. L.; Tseng, Y. Z.; Chen, C. H.; Lee, Y. T.; Lien, W. P.; Huang, S. K.S.

In: Heart, Vol. 80, No. 1, 01.01.1998, p. 80-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lai, L. P. ; Lin, J. L. ; Lin, L. J. ; Chen, W. J. ; Ho, Y. L. ; Tseng, Y. Z. ; Chen, C. H. ; Lee, Y. T. ; Lien, W. P. ; Huang, S. K.S. / New electrocardiographic criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter : Correlation with electrophysiological study and radiofrequency catheter ablation. In: Heart. 1998 ; Vol. 80, No. 1. pp. 80-85.
@article{2ca7f091f0974639a3443a978c2b9c2f,
title = "New electrocardiographic criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter: Correlation with electrophysiological study and radiofrequency catheter ablation",
abstract = "Objective-To develop new electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters. Background-Traditionally, the EGG differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters is based on the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads. However, determination of flutter wave polarity is subjective and sometimes difficult, especially in flutter waves of undulating pattern. Patients-The study comprised 37 consecutive patients with drug resistant atrial flutter; 30 had counterclockwise and 17 had clockwise atrial flutter (10 had both forms of atrial flutter). The isthmus dependence was confirmed by entrainment study and catheter ablation. The EGG patterns of both types of atrial flutter were compared and the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads was determined by four independent cardiologists. Results-The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads appeared negative in 24, positive in one, and equivocal in five of the counterclockwise atrial flutters; polarity appeared negative in one, positive in 10, and equivocal in six of the clockwise atrial flutters. However, the aVF/lead I flutter wave amplitude ratio was > 2.5 in all counterclockwise but < 2.5 in all clockwise atrial flutters. The flutter wave nadirs in the inferior leads corresponded to the upstrokes in V1 in all counterclockwise atrial flutters, but corresponded to the downstrokes in V1 in all clockwise atrial flutters. Conclusions-The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads does not correlate well with the flutter wave rotating direction. However, counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters can be differentiated by new ECG criteria with high accuracy.",
keywords = "Atrial flutter, Electrocardiography, Radiofrequency catheter ablation",
author = "Lai, {L. P.} and Lin, {J. L.} and Lin, {L. J.} and Chen, {W. J.} and Ho, {Y. L.} and Tseng, {Y. Z.} and Chen, {C. H.} and Lee, {Y. T.} and Lien, {W. P.} and Huang, {S. K.S.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/hrt.80.1.80",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "80--85",
journal = "Heart",
issn = "1355-6037",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New electrocardiographic criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter

T2 - Correlation with electrophysiological study and radiofrequency catheter ablation

AU - Lai, L. P.

AU - Lin, J. L.

AU - Lin, L. J.

AU - Chen, W. J.

AU - Ho, Y. L.

AU - Tseng, Y. Z.

AU - Chen, C. H.

AU - Lee, Y. T.

AU - Lien, W. P.

AU - Huang, S. K.S.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Objective-To develop new electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters. Background-Traditionally, the EGG differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters is based on the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads. However, determination of flutter wave polarity is subjective and sometimes difficult, especially in flutter waves of undulating pattern. Patients-The study comprised 37 consecutive patients with drug resistant atrial flutter; 30 had counterclockwise and 17 had clockwise atrial flutter (10 had both forms of atrial flutter). The isthmus dependence was confirmed by entrainment study and catheter ablation. The EGG patterns of both types of atrial flutter were compared and the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads was determined by four independent cardiologists. Results-The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads appeared negative in 24, positive in one, and equivocal in five of the counterclockwise atrial flutters; polarity appeared negative in one, positive in 10, and equivocal in six of the clockwise atrial flutters. However, the aVF/lead I flutter wave amplitude ratio was > 2.5 in all counterclockwise but < 2.5 in all clockwise atrial flutters. The flutter wave nadirs in the inferior leads corresponded to the upstrokes in V1 in all counterclockwise atrial flutters, but corresponded to the downstrokes in V1 in all clockwise atrial flutters. Conclusions-The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads does not correlate well with the flutter wave rotating direction. However, counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters can be differentiated by new ECG criteria with high accuracy.

AB - Objective-To develop new electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters. Background-Traditionally, the EGG differentiation between counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters is based on the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads. However, determination of flutter wave polarity is subjective and sometimes difficult, especially in flutter waves of undulating pattern. Patients-The study comprised 37 consecutive patients with drug resistant atrial flutter; 30 had counterclockwise and 17 had clockwise atrial flutter (10 had both forms of atrial flutter). The isthmus dependence was confirmed by entrainment study and catheter ablation. The EGG patterns of both types of atrial flutter were compared and the flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads was determined by four independent cardiologists. Results-The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads appeared negative in 24, positive in one, and equivocal in five of the counterclockwise atrial flutters; polarity appeared negative in one, positive in 10, and equivocal in six of the clockwise atrial flutters. However, the aVF/lead I flutter wave amplitude ratio was > 2.5 in all counterclockwise but < 2.5 in all clockwise atrial flutters. The flutter wave nadirs in the inferior leads corresponded to the upstrokes in V1 in all counterclockwise atrial flutters, but corresponded to the downstrokes in V1 in all clockwise atrial flutters. Conclusions-The flutter wave polarity in the inferior leads does not correlate well with the flutter wave rotating direction. However, counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutters can be differentiated by new ECG criteria with high accuracy.

KW - Atrial flutter

KW - Electrocardiography

KW - Radiofrequency catheter ablation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7344259586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7344259586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/hrt.80.1.80

DO - 10.1136/hrt.80.1.80

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 80

EP - 85

JO - Heart

JF - Heart

SN - 1355-6037

IS - 1

ER -