Neurophilosophical perspectives of neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry - Giving way to a paradigm shift?

Joachim Witzel, Martin Walter, Bernhard Bogerts, Georg Northoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Forensic psychiatry is concerned with the relationship between psychiatric abnormalities and legal violations and crimes. Due to the lack of available biological criteria, evaluation and therapy in forensic psychiatry have so far been restricted to psychosocial and mental criteria of offenders' personalities. Recent advances in neurosciences allow a closer approach to the neural correlates of personality, moral judgments and decision-making. We propose to discuss the introduction of biological criteria in the field of forensic psychiatry and to establish rules as to what extent such biological criteria will be a better and more reliable choice in judging mentally ill criminals by using all available information that can be obtained by biological means. Psychosocial and subjective criteria in forensic evaluation will be more and more accomplished by biopsychosocial and objective criteria. The responsibility of having committed a criminal act will no longer be exclusively defined by judging free and voluntary decision-making, but rather by brain-behavior relationships. What is often referred to as psychosocially determined mental processes thus could be complemented by estimating the degree of biopsychosocially determined neural processes. We conclude that such a process could contribute to a paradigm shift in forensic psychiatry, which will have profound implications for offenders, forensic psychologists and psychiatrists, the law and society in general.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-130
Number of pages18
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Forensic Psychiatry
psychiatry
Neuroimaging
paradigm
Psychiatry
Personality
Decision Making
Mental Processes
offender
Mentally Ill Persons
personality
Crime
Neurosciences
decision making
moral judgement
psychiatrist
neurosciences
Psychology
available information
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Neurophilosophical perspectives of neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry - Giving way to a paradigm shift? / Witzel, Joachim; Walter, Martin; Bogerts, Bernhard; Northoff, Georg.

In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2008, p. 113-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed6ab44ed8b342afbdddc9ede1e19c6d,
title = "Neurophilosophical perspectives of neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry - Giving way to a paradigm shift?",
abstract = "Forensic psychiatry is concerned with the relationship between psychiatric abnormalities and legal violations and crimes. Due to the lack of available biological criteria, evaluation and therapy in forensic psychiatry have so far been restricted to psychosocial and mental criteria of offenders' personalities. Recent advances in neurosciences allow a closer approach to the neural correlates of personality, moral judgments and decision-making. We propose to discuss the introduction of biological criteria in the field of forensic psychiatry and to establish rules as to what extent such biological criteria will be a better and more reliable choice in judging mentally ill criminals by using all available information that can be obtained by biological means. Psychosocial and subjective criteria in forensic evaluation will be more and more accomplished by biopsychosocial and objective criteria. The responsibility of having committed a criminal act will no longer be exclusively defined by judging free and voluntary decision-making, but rather by brain-behavior relationships. What is often referred to as psychosocially determined mental processes thus could be complemented by estimating the degree of biopsychosocially determined neural processes. We conclude that such a process could contribute to a paradigm shift in forensic psychiatry, which will have profound implications for offenders, forensic psychologists and psychiatrists, the law and society in general.",
author = "Joachim Witzel and Martin Walter and Bernhard Bogerts and Georg Northoff",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.798",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "113--130",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurophilosophical perspectives of neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry - Giving way to a paradigm shift?

AU - Witzel, Joachim

AU - Walter, Martin

AU - Bogerts, Bernhard

AU - Northoff, Georg

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Forensic psychiatry is concerned with the relationship between psychiatric abnormalities and legal violations and crimes. Due to the lack of available biological criteria, evaluation and therapy in forensic psychiatry have so far been restricted to psychosocial and mental criteria of offenders' personalities. Recent advances in neurosciences allow a closer approach to the neural correlates of personality, moral judgments and decision-making. We propose to discuss the introduction of biological criteria in the field of forensic psychiatry and to establish rules as to what extent such biological criteria will be a better and more reliable choice in judging mentally ill criminals by using all available information that can be obtained by biological means. Psychosocial and subjective criteria in forensic evaluation will be more and more accomplished by biopsychosocial and objective criteria. The responsibility of having committed a criminal act will no longer be exclusively defined by judging free and voluntary decision-making, but rather by brain-behavior relationships. What is often referred to as psychosocially determined mental processes thus could be complemented by estimating the degree of biopsychosocially determined neural processes. We conclude that such a process could contribute to a paradigm shift in forensic psychiatry, which will have profound implications for offenders, forensic psychologists and psychiatrists, the law and society in general.

AB - Forensic psychiatry is concerned with the relationship between psychiatric abnormalities and legal violations and crimes. Due to the lack of available biological criteria, evaluation and therapy in forensic psychiatry have so far been restricted to psychosocial and mental criteria of offenders' personalities. Recent advances in neurosciences allow a closer approach to the neural correlates of personality, moral judgments and decision-making. We propose to discuss the introduction of biological criteria in the field of forensic psychiatry and to establish rules as to what extent such biological criteria will be a better and more reliable choice in judging mentally ill criminals by using all available information that can be obtained by biological means. Psychosocial and subjective criteria in forensic evaluation will be more and more accomplished by biopsychosocial and objective criteria. The responsibility of having committed a criminal act will no longer be exclusively defined by judging free and voluntary decision-making, but rather by brain-behavior relationships. What is often referred to as psychosocially determined mental processes thus could be complemented by estimating the degree of biopsychosocially determined neural processes. We conclude that such a process could contribute to a paradigm shift in forensic psychiatry, which will have profound implications for offenders, forensic psychologists and psychiatrists, the law and society in general.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42249101098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42249101098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.798

DO - 10.1002/bsl.798

M3 - Article

C2 - 18327827

AN - SCOPUS:42249101098

VL - 26

SP - 113

EP - 130

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 1

ER -