Multisection CT angiography compared with catheter angiography in diagnosing vertebral artery dissection

Chi Jen Chen, Ying Chi Tseng, Tsong Hai Lee, Hui-Ling Hsu, Lai Chu See

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multisection CT angiography is a minimally invasive technique that can provide high-resolution and high-contrast images of the arterial lumen and wall. To our knowledge, the ability of multisection CT angiography in detecting vertebral artery (VA) dissection has never been evaluated. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of a routine, standardized, multisection CT angiographic protocol for the detection of VA dissection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed multisection CT angiograms of 17 patients with VA dissection and 17 control subjects. The acquisition protocol for multisection CT angiography was 1.25-mm nominal section thickness, a table speed of 7.5 mm per rotation (9.4 mm/s), and a 0.8-second gantry rotation period. Two radiologists assessed the maximum intensity projection and axial source images. The sensitivity and specificity of this technique in depicting VA dissection were determined. RESULTS: Conventional angiography depicted 15 normal and 19 dissected VAs (including five stenotic, seven occlusive, and seven aneurysmal dissections) in the patient group and 28 normal and six atherosclerotic VAs in the control group. Multisection CT angiography enabled successful diagnosis of all 19 dissected VAs and 48 (98%) of 49 nondissected VAs but misidentified a severe atherosclerotic lesion as an aneurysmal-type dissection. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of multisection CT angiography in diagnosing VA dissection were 100%, 98%, 98.5%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multisection CT angiography was a sensitive and accurate technique for the diagnosis of VA dissection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)769-774
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume25
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - May 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vertebral Artery Dissection
Angiography
Catheters
Sensitivity and Specificity
Dissection
Computed Tomography Angiography
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Multisection CT angiography compared with catheter angiography in diagnosing vertebral artery dissection. / Chen, Chi Jen; Tseng, Ying Chi; Lee, Tsong Hai; Hsu, Hui-Ling; See, Lai Chu.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 25, No. 5, 05.2004, p. 769-774.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dceb2c6a3c24400fb6fda2598b9d1358,
title = "Multisection CT angiography compared with catheter angiography in diagnosing vertebral artery dissection",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multisection CT angiography is a minimally invasive technique that can provide high-resolution and high-contrast images of the arterial lumen and wall. To our knowledge, the ability of multisection CT angiography in detecting vertebral artery (VA) dissection has never been evaluated. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of a routine, standardized, multisection CT angiographic protocol for the detection of VA dissection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed multisection CT angiograms of 17 patients with VA dissection and 17 control subjects. The acquisition protocol for multisection CT angiography was 1.25-mm nominal section thickness, a table speed of 7.5 mm per rotation (9.4 mm/s), and a 0.8-second gantry rotation period. Two radiologists assessed the maximum intensity projection and axial source images. The sensitivity and specificity of this technique in depicting VA dissection were determined. RESULTS: Conventional angiography depicted 15 normal and 19 dissected VAs (including five stenotic, seven occlusive, and seven aneurysmal dissections) in the patient group and 28 normal and six atherosclerotic VAs in the control group. Multisection CT angiography enabled successful diagnosis of all 19 dissected VAs and 48 (98{\%}) of 49 nondissected VAs but misidentified a severe atherosclerotic lesion as an aneurysmal-type dissection. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of multisection CT angiography in diagnosing VA dissection were 100{\%}, 98{\%}, 98.5{\%}, 95{\%}, and 100{\%}, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multisection CT angiography was a sensitive and accurate technique for the diagnosis of VA dissection.",
author = "Chen, {Chi Jen} and Tseng, {Ying Chi} and Lee, {Tsong Hai} and Hui-Ling Hsu and See, {Lai Chu}",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "769--774",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multisection CT angiography compared with catheter angiography in diagnosing vertebral artery dissection

AU - Chen, Chi Jen

AU - Tseng, Ying Chi

AU - Lee, Tsong Hai

AU - Hsu, Hui-Ling

AU - See, Lai Chu

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multisection CT angiography is a minimally invasive technique that can provide high-resolution and high-contrast images of the arterial lumen and wall. To our knowledge, the ability of multisection CT angiography in detecting vertebral artery (VA) dissection has never been evaluated. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of a routine, standardized, multisection CT angiographic protocol for the detection of VA dissection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed multisection CT angiograms of 17 patients with VA dissection and 17 control subjects. The acquisition protocol for multisection CT angiography was 1.25-mm nominal section thickness, a table speed of 7.5 mm per rotation (9.4 mm/s), and a 0.8-second gantry rotation period. Two radiologists assessed the maximum intensity projection and axial source images. The sensitivity and specificity of this technique in depicting VA dissection were determined. RESULTS: Conventional angiography depicted 15 normal and 19 dissected VAs (including five stenotic, seven occlusive, and seven aneurysmal dissections) in the patient group and 28 normal and six atherosclerotic VAs in the control group. Multisection CT angiography enabled successful diagnosis of all 19 dissected VAs and 48 (98%) of 49 nondissected VAs but misidentified a severe atherosclerotic lesion as an aneurysmal-type dissection. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of multisection CT angiography in diagnosing VA dissection were 100%, 98%, 98.5%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multisection CT angiography was a sensitive and accurate technique for the diagnosis of VA dissection.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multisection CT angiography is a minimally invasive technique that can provide high-resolution and high-contrast images of the arterial lumen and wall. To our knowledge, the ability of multisection CT angiography in detecting vertebral artery (VA) dissection has never been evaluated. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of a routine, standardized, multisection CT angiographic protocol for the detection of VA dissection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed multisection CT angiograms of 17 patients with VA dissection and 17 control subjects. The acquisition protocol for multisection CT angiography was 1.25-mm nominal section thickness, a table speed of 7.5 mm per rotation (9.4 mm/s), and a 0.8-second gantry rotation period. Two radiologists assessed the maximum intensity projection and axial source images. The sensitivity and specificity of this technique in depicting VA dissection were determined. RESULTS: Conventional angiography depicted 15 normal and 19 dissected VAs (including five stenotic, seven occlusive, and seven aneurysmal dissections) in the patient group and 28 normal and six atherosclerotic VAs in the control group. Multisection CT angiography enabled successful diagnosis of all 19 dissected VAs and 48 (98%) of 49 nondissected VAs but misidentified a severe atherosclerotic lesion as an aneurysmal-type dissection. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of multisection CT angiography in diagnosing VA dissection were 100%, 98%, 98.5%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multisection CT angiography was a sensitive and accurate technique for the diagnosis of VA dissection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442644258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442644258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15140717

AN - SCOPUS:2442644258

VL - 25

SP - 769

EP - 774

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 5

ER -