Multi-model simulation of soil temperature, soil water content and biomass in Euro-Mediterranean grasslands: Uncertainties and ensemble performance

R. Sándor, Z. Barcza, M. Acutis, L. Doro, D. Hidy, M. Köchy, J. Minet, E. Lellei-Kovács, S. Ma, A. Perego, S. Rolinski, F. Ruget, M. Sanna, G. Seddaiu, L. Wu, G. Bellocchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study presents results from a major grassland model intercomparison exercise, and highlights the main challenges faced in the implementation of a multi-model ensemble prediction system in grasslands. Nine, independently developed simulation models linking climate, soil, vegetation and management to grassland biogeochemical cycles and production were compared in a simulation of soil water content (SWC) and soil temperature (ST) in the topsoil, and of biomass production. The results were assessed against SWC and ST data from five observational grassland sites representing a range of conditions – Grillenburg in Germany, Laqueuille in France with both extensive and intensive management, Monte Bondone in Italy and Oensingen in Switzerland – and against yield measurements from the same sites and other experimental grassland sites in Europe and Israel. We present a comparison of model estimates from individual models to the multi-model ensemble (represented by multi-model median: MMM). With calibration (seven out of nine models), the performances were acceptable for weekly-aggregated ST (R2 > 0.7 with individual models and >0.8–0.9 with MMM), but less satisfactory with SWC (R2 < 0.6 with individual models and < ∼ 0.5 with MMM) and biomass (R2 < ∼0.3 with both individual models and MMM). With individual models, maximum biases of about −5 °C for ST, −0.3 m3 m−3 for SWC and 360 g DM m−2 for yield, as well as negative modelling efficiencies and some high relative root mean square errors indicate low model performance, especially for biomass. We also found substantial discrepancies across different models, indicating considerable uncertainties regarding the simulation of grassland processes. The multi-model approach allowed for improved performance, but further progress is strongly needed in the way models represent processes in managed grassland systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-40
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Agronomy
Volume88
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

soil temperature
soil water content
simulation models
uncertainty
grasslands
grassland
soil water
water content
biomass
simulation
biogeochemical cycle
soil management
topsoil
Israel
Switzerland
biogeochemical cycles
climate modeling
biomass production
exercise
calibration

Keywords

  • Biomass
  • Grasslands
  • Modelling
  • Multi-model ensemble
  • Soil processes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Multi-model simulation of soil temperature, soil water content and biomass in Euro-Mediterranean grasslands : Uncertainties and ensemble performance. / Sándor, R.; Barcza, Z.; Acutis, M.; Doro, L.; Hidy, D.; Köchy, M.; Minet, J.; Lellei-Kovács, E.; Ma, S.; Perego, A.; Rolinski, S.; Ruget, F.; Sanna, M.; Seddaiu, G.; Wu, L.; Bellocchi, G.

In: European Journal of Agronomy, Vol. 88, 08.2017, p. 22-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sándor, R, Barcza, Z, Acutis, M, Doro, L, Hidy, D, Köchy, M, Minet, J, Lellei-Kovács, E, Ma, S, Perego, A, Rolinski, S, Ruget, F, Sanna, M, Seddaiu, G, Wu, L & Bellocchi, G 2017, 'Multi-model simulation of soil temperature, soil water content and biomass in Euro-Mediterranean grasslands: Uncertainties and ensemble performance', European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 88, pp. 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.06.006
Sándor, R. ; Barcza, Z. ; Acutis, M. ; Doro, L. ; Hidy, D. ; Köchy, M. ; Minet, J. ; Lellei-Kovács, E. ; Ma, S. ; Perego, A. ; Rolinski, S. ; Ruget, F. ; Sanna, M. ; Seddaiu, G. ; Wu, L. ; Bellocchi, G. / Multi-model simulation of soil temperature, soil water content and biomass in Euro-Mediterranean grasslands : Uncertainties and ensemble performance. In: European Journal of Agronomy. 2017 ; Vol. 88. pp. 22-40.
@article{a09be9dbfb4d48f4b50c9fe14ca8a49a,
title = "Multi-model simulation of soil temperature, soil water content and biomass in Euro-Mediterranean grasslands: Uncertainties and ensemble performance",
abstract = "This study presents results from a major grassland model intercomparison exercise, and highlights the main challenges faced in the implementation of a multi-model ensemble prediction system in grasslands. Nine, independently developed simulation models linking climate, soil, vegetation and management to grassland biogeochemical cycles and production were compared in a simulation of soil water content (SWC) and soil temperature (ST) in the topsoil, and of biomass production. The results were assessed against SWC and ST data from five observational grassland sites representing a range of conditions – Grillenburg in Germany, Laqueuille in France with both extensive and intensive management, Monte Bondone in Italy and Oensingen in Switzerland – and against yield measurements from the same sites and other experimental grassland sites in Europe and Israel. We present a comparison of model estimates from individual models to the multi-model ensemble (represented by multi-model median: MMM). With calibration (seven out of nine models), the performances were acceptable for weekly-aggregated ST (R2 > 0.7 with individual models and >0.8–0.9 with MMM), but less satisfactory with SWC (R2 < 0.6 with individual models and < ∼ 0.5 with MMM) and biomass (R2 < ∼0.3 with both individual models and MMM). With individual models, maximum biases of about −5 °C for ST, −0.3 m3 m−3 for SWC and 360 g DM m−2 for yield, as well as negative modelling efficiencies and some high relative root mean square errors indicate low model performance, especially for biomass. We also found substantial discrepancies across different models, indicating considerable uncertainties regarding the simulation of grassland processes. The multi-model approach allowed for improved performance, but further progress is strongly needed in the way models represent processes in managed grassland systems.",
keywords = "Biomass, Grasslands, Modelling, Multi-model ensemble, Soil processes",
author = "R. S{\'a}ndor and Z. Barcza and M. Acutis and L. Doro and D. Hidy and M. K{\"o}chy and J. Minet and E. Lellei-Kov{\'a}cs and S. Ma and A. Perego and S. Rolinski and F. Ruget and M. Sanna and G. Seddaiu and L. Wu and G. Bellocchi",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.eja.2016.06.006",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "22--40",
journal = "European Journal of Agronomy",
issn = "1161-0301",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-model simulation of soil temperature, soil water content and biomass in Euro-Mediterranean grasslands

T2 - Uncertainties and ensemble performance

AU - Sándor, R.

AU - Barcza, Z.

AU - Acutis, M.

AU - Doro, L.

AU - Hidy, D.

AU - Köchy, M.

AU - Minet, J.

AU - Lellei-Kovács, E.

AU - Ma, S.

AU - Perego, A.

AU - Rolinski, S.

AU - Ruget, F.

AU - Sanna, M.

AU - Seddaiu, G.

AU - Wu, L.

AU - Bellocchi, G.

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - This study presents results from a major grassland model intercomparison exercise, and highlights the main challenges faced in the implementation of a multi-model ensemble prediction system in grasslands. Nine, independently developed simulation models linking climate, soil, vegetation and management to grassland biogeochemical cycles and production were compared in a simulation of soil water content (SWC) and soil temperature (ST) in the topsoil, and of biomass production. The results were assessed against SWC and ST data from five observational grassland sites representing a range of conditions – Grillenburg in Germany, Laqueuille in France with both extensive and intensive management, Monte Bondone in Italy and Oensingen in Switzerland – and against yield measurements from the same sites and other experimental grassland sites in Europe and Israel. We present a comparison of model estimates from individual models to the multi-model ensemble (represented by multi-model median: MMM). With calibration (seven out of nine models), the performances were acceptable for weekly-aggregated ST (R2 > 0.7 with individual models and >0.8–0.9 with MMM), but less satisfactory with SWC (R2 < 0.6 with individual models and < ∼ 0.5 with MMM) and biomass (R2 < ∼0.3 with both individual models and MMM). With individual models, maximum biases of about −5 °C for ST, −0.3 m3 m−3 for SWC and 360 g DM m−2 for yield, as well as negative modelling efficiencies and some high relative root mean square errors indicate low model performance, especially for biomass. We also found substantial discrepancies across different models, indicating considerable uncertainties regarding the simulation of grassland processes. The multi-model approach allowed for improved performance, but further progress is strongly needed in the way models represent processes in managed grassland systems.

AB - This study presents results from a major grassland model intercomparison exercise, and highlights the main challenges faced in the implementation of a multi-model ensemble prediction system in grasslands. Nine, independently developed simulation models linking climate, soil, vegetation and management to grassland biogeochemical cycles and production were compared in a simulation of soil water content (SWC) and soil temperature (ST) in the topsoil, and of biomass production. The results were assessed against SWC and ST data from five observational grassland sites representing a range of conditions – Grillenburg in Germany, Laqueuille in France with both extensive and intensive management, Monte Bondone in Italy and Oensingen in Switzerland – and against yield measurements from the same sites and other experimental grassland sites in Europe and Israel. We present a comparison of model estimates from individual models to the multi-model ensemble (represented by multi-model median: MMM). With calibration (seven out of nine models), the performances were acceptable for weekly-aggregated ST (R2 > 0.7 with individual models and >0.8–0.9 with MMM), but less satisfactory with SWC (R2 < 0.6 with individual models and < ∼ 0.5 with MMM) and biomass (R2 < ∼0.3 with both individual models and MMM). With individual models, maximum biases of about −5 °C for ST, −0.3 m3 m−3 for SWC and 360 g DM m−2 for yield, as well as negative modelling efficiencies and some high relative root mean square errors indicate low model performance, especially for biomass. We also found substantial discrepancies across different models, indicating considerable uncertainties regarding the simulation of grassland processes. The multi-model approach allowed for improved performance, but further progress is strongly needed in the way models represent processes in managed grassland systems.

KW - Biomass

KW - Grasslands

KW - Modelling

KW - Multi-model ensemble

KW - Soil processes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979596876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979596876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eja.2016.06.006

DO - 10.1016/j.eja.2016.06.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84979596876

VL - 88

SP - 22

EP - 40

JO - European Journal of Agronomy

JF - European Journal of Agronomy

SN - 1161-0301

ER -