Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery via submammary hidden incision

Ming Chi Yung, Jih Shiuan Wang, Shiau Ting Lai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. With the recent advancement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery based on the needs of decreasing costs, hospital stay, recovery time and improving cosmetic appearance, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMS) is being actively pursued. The objective of this study was to compare our submammary hidden incision method to two other more proven methods of MIMS with respect to length of operation, clinical outcome and cosmetic satisfaction. Methods. From July, 1996 to June, 1998, a total of 14 patients underwent MIMS in our hospital. Three different approaches were used: the limited right-side thoracotomy approach, the parasternal incision approach and our submammary hidden incision approach, of which, this is the first report. All relevant clinical results are reported, including general characteristics of the operations, morbidity and mortality, length of hospitalization, pain relief and patient satisfaction. Results. Five patients underwent MIMS via limited thoracotomy, four via parasternotomy and five with our submammary hidden incision method. There were six mitral valves repaired and eight replaced. Conversion to traditional sternotomy was not necessary in any of the three groups. The results from the three different approaches did not differ significantly across the different parameters measured. Nonetheless, the submammary hidden incision approach showed promise in the areas of length of stay for both intensive care patients (36.3 ± 5.0 hours) and total hospitalization (10.7 ± 0.6 days), pain relief and patient satisfaction. Conclusions. The submammary hidden incision method does not result in any significant disadvantage in clinical outcome. The method resulted in more satisfied patients due to less pain, shorter hospital stay, and most importantly, cosmetic appearance of the resulting surgical scar. We will make the submammary hidden incision approach the MIMS approach of choice at our institution and continue to monitor the long-term results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)322-328
Number of pages7
JournalChinese Medical Journal (Taipei)
Volume63
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mitral Valve
Cosmetics
Length of Stay
Thoracotomy
Patient Satisfaction
Pain
Hospitalization
Sternotomy
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Critical Care
Thoracic Surgery
Cicatrix
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mortality

Keywords

  • Minimally invasive cardiac surgery
  • Mitral valve repair
  • Mitral vane replacement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery via submammary hidden incision. / Yung, Ming Chi; Wang, Jih Shiuan; Lai, Shiau Ting.

In: Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), Vol. 63, No. 4, 01.04.2000, p. 322-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yung, Ming Chi ; Wang, Jih Shiuan ; Lai, Shiau Ting. / Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery via submammary hidden incision. In: Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei). 2000 ; Vol. 63, No. 4. pp. 322-328.
@article{40769cc29a864c268e524ff35cb1abfa,
title = "Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery via submammary hidden incision",
abstract = "Background. With the recent advancement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery based on the needs of decreasing costs, hospital stay, recovery time and improving cosmetic appearance, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMS) is being actively pursued. The objective of this study was to compare our submammary hidden incision method to two other more proven methods of MIMS with respect to length of operation, clinical outcome and cosmetic satisfaction. Methods. From July, 1996 to June, 1998, a total of 14 patients underwent MIMS in our hospital. Three different approaches were used: the limited right-side thoracotomy approach, the parasternal incision approach and our submammary hidden incision approach, of which, this is the first report. All relevant clinical results are reported, including general characteristics of the operations, morbidity and mortality, length of hospitalization, pain relief and patient satisfaction. Results. Five patients underwent MIMS via limited thoracotomy, four via parasternotomy and five with our submammary hidden incision method. There were six mitral valves repaired and eight replaced. Conversion to traditional sternotomy was not necessary in any of the three groups. The results from the three different approaches did not differ significantly across the different parameters measured. Nonetheless, the submammary hidden incision approach showed promise in the areas of length of stay for both intensive care patients (36.3 ± 5.0 hours) and total hospitalization (10.7 ± 0.6 days), pain relief and patient satisfaction. Conclusions. The submammary hidden incision method does not result in any significant disadvantage in clinical outcome. The method resulted in more satisfied patients due to less pain, shorter hospital stay, and most importantly, cosmetic appearance of the resulting surgical scar. We will make the submammary hidden incision approach the MIMS approach of choice at our institution and continue to monitor the long-term results.",
keywords = "Minimally invasive cardiac surgery, Mitral valve repair, Mitral vane replacement",
author = "Yung, {Ming Chi} and Wang, {Jih Shiuan} and Lai, {Shiau Ting}",
year = "2000",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "322--328",
journal = "Journal of the Chinese Medical Association",
issn = "1726-4901",
publisher = "Elsevier Taiwan LLC",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery via submammary hidden incision

AU - Yung, Ming Chi

AU - Wang, Jih Shiuan

AU - Lai, Shiau Ting

PY - 2000/4/1

Y1 - 2000/4/1

N2 - Background. With the recent advancement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery based on the needs of decreasing costs, hospital stay, recovery time and improving cosmetic appearance, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMS) is being actively pursued. The objective of this study was to compare our submammary hidden incision method to two other more proven methods of MIMS with respect to length of operation, clinical outcome and cosmetic satisfaction. Methods. From July, 1996 to June, 1998, a total of 14 patients underwent MIMS in our hospital. Three different approaches were used: the limited right-side thoracotomy approach, the parasternal incision approach and our submammary hidden incision approach, of which, this is the first report. All relevant clinical results are reported, including general characteristics of the operations, morbidity and mortality, length of hospitalization, pain relief and patient satisfaction. Results. Five patients underwent MIMS via limited thoracotomy, four via parasternotomy and five with our submammary hidden incision method. There were six mitral valves repaired and eight replaced. Conversion to traditional sternotomy was not necessary in any of the three groups. The results from the three different approaches did not differ significantly across the different parameters measured. Nonetheless, the submammary hidden incision approach showed promise in the areas of length of stay for both intensive care patients (36.3 ± 5.0 hours) and total hospitalization (10.7 ± 0.6 days), pain relief and patient satisfaction. Conclusions. The submammary hidden incision method does not result in any significant disadvantage in clinical outcome. The method resulted in more satisfied patients due to less pain, shorter hospital stay, and most importantly, cosmetic appearance of the resulting surgical scar. We will make the submammary hidden incision approach the MIMS approach of choice at our institution and continue to monitor the long-term results.

AB - Background. With the recent advancement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery based on the needs of decreasing costs, hospital stay, recovery time and improving cosmetic appearance, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMS) is being actively pursued. The objective of this study was to compare our submammary hidden incision method to two other more proven methods of MIMS with respect to length of operation, clinical outcome and cosmetic satisfaction. Methods. From July, 1996 to June, 1998, a total of 14 patients underwent MIMS in our hospital. Three different approaches were used: the limited right-side thoracotomy approach, the parasternal incision approach and our submammary hidden incision approach, of which, this is the first report. All relevant clinical results are reported, including general characteristics of the operations, morbidity and mortality, length of hospitalization, pain relief and patient satisfaction. Results. Five patients underwent MIMS via limited thoracotomy, four via parasternotomy and five with our submammary hidden incision method. There were six mitral valves repaired and eight replaced. Conversion to traditional sternotomy was not necessary in any of the three groups. The results from the three different approaches did not differ significantly across the different parameters measured. Nonetheless, the submammary hidden incision approach showed promise in the areas of length of stay for both intensive care patients (36.3 ± 5.0 hours) and total hospitalization (10.7 ± 0.6 days), pain relief and patient satisfaction. Conclusions. The submammary hidden incision method does not result in any significant disadvantage in clinical outcome. The method resulted in more satisfied patients due to less pain, shorter hospital stay, and most importantly, cosmetic appearance of the resulting surgical scar. We will make the submammary hidden incision approach the MIMS approach of choice at our institution and continue to monitor the long-term results.

KW - Minimally invasive cardiac surgery

KW - Mitral valve repair

KW - Mitral vane replacement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034022865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034022865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10820912

AN - SCOPUS:0034022865

VL - 63

SP - 322

EP - 328

JO - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association

SN - 1726-4901

IS - 4

ER -