Methodological issues in motorcycle injury epidemiology

Mau Roung Lin, Jess F. Kraus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Motorcycle riders are over 30 times more likely than car occupants to die in a traffic crash. While this fact is well known, specific issues of methodology in epidemiological motorcycle-injury research have been rarely researched. To facilitate more-valid research on motorcycle injuries, this article evaluates the current state of our knowledge on how we measure the population at risk of injury, completeness of case finding and identification, validity of crash/injury data sources, and completeness of information on important exposures such as alcohol consumption, helmet status, crash severity, and crash speeds, as well as problems of existing injury severity scales and statistical analyses for correlated injury data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1653-1660
Number of pages8
JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Motorcycles
Epidemiology
motorcycle
epidemiology
Wounds and Injuries
alcohol consumption
Alcohols
Railroad cars
traffic
Head Protective Devices
Information Storage and Retrieval
methodology
Research
Alcohol Drinking

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Helmet
  • Measurement
  • Methodology
  • Motorcycle injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transportation
  • Safety Research
  • Law
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Chemical Health and Safety
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Methodological issues in motorcycle injury epidemiology. / Lin, Mau Roung; Kraus, Jess F.

In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 5, 09.2008, p. 1653-1660.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{35c95f585f8643dca891425b2882c744,
title = "Methodological issues in motorcycle injury epidemiology",
abstract = "Motorcycle riders are over 30 times more likely than car occupants to die in a traffic crash. While this fact is well known, specific issues of methodology in epidemiological motorcycle-injury research have been rarely researched. To facilitate more-valid research on motorcycle injuries, this article evaluates the current state of our knowledge on how we measure the population at risk of injury, completeness of case finding and identification, validity of crash/injury data sources, and completeness of information on important exposures such as alcohol consumption, helmet status, crash severity, and crash speeds, as well as problems of existing injury severity scales and statistical analyses for correlated injury data.",
keywords = "Epidemiology, Helmet, Measurement, Methodology, Motorcycle injury",
author = "Lin, {Mau Roung} and Kraus, {Jess F.}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1653--1660",
journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",
issn = "0001-4575",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological issues in motorcycle injury epidemiology

AU - Lin, Mau Roung

AU - Kraus, Jess F.

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - Motorcycle riders are over 30 times more likely than car occupants to die in a traffic crash. While this fact is well known, specific issues of methodology in epidemiological motorcycle-injury research have been rarely researched. To facilitate more-valid research on motorcycle injuries, this article evaluates the current state of our knowledge on how we measure the population at risk of injury, completeness of case finding and identification, validity of crash/injury data sources, and completeness of information on important exposures such as alcohol consumption, helmet status, crash severity, and crash speeds, as well as problems of existing injury severity scales and statistical analyses for correlated injury data.

AB - Motorcycle riders are over 30 times more likely than car occupants to die in a traffic crash. While this fact is well known, specific issues of methodology in epidemiological motorcycle-injury research have been rarely researched. To facilitate more-valid research on motorcycle injuries, this article evaluates the current state of our knowledge on how we measure the population at risk of injury, completeness of case finding and identification, validity of crash/injury data sources, and completeness of information on important exposures such as alcohol consumption, helmet status, crash severity, and crash speeds, as well as problems of existing injury severity scales and statistical analyses for correlated injury data.

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Helmet

KW - Measurement

KW - Methodology

KW - Motorcycle injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49949086045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49949086045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.005

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 1653

EP - 1660

JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

SN - 0001-4575

IS - 5

ER -