Methodische Defizite in der Neuroethik

Benötigen wir eine theoretische Neuroethik?

Translated title of the contribution: Methodological deficits in neuroethics. Do we need theoretical neuroethics?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current neuroethics can be characterized best as empirical neuroethics: it is strongly empirically oriented in that it not only includes empirical findings from neuroscience but also searches for applications within neuroscience. This, however, neglects the social and political contexts which could be subject to a future social neuroethics. In addition, methodological issues need to be considered as in theoretical neuroethics. The focus in this article is on two such methodological issues: (1) the analysis of the different levels and their inferences among each other which is exemplified by the inference of consciousness from the otherwise purely neuronal data in patients with vegetative state and (2) the problem of linking descriptive and normative concepts in a non-reductive and non-inferential way for which I suggest the mutual contextualization between both concepts. This results in a methodological strategy that can be described as contextual fact-norm iterativity.

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)1196-1202
Number of pages7
JournalNervenarzt
Volume84
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neurosciences
Persistent Vegetative State
Consciousness

Keywords

  • Contextual fact-norm iterativity
  • Empirical neuroethics
  • Levels of analysis
  • Social neuroethics
  • Theoretical neuroethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Methodische Defizite in der Neuroethik : Benötigen wir eine theoretische Neuroethik? / Northoff, G.

In: Nervenarzt, Vol. 84, No. 10, 10.2013, p. 1196-1202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{be1a78f16e634c17a582b4ae0d6d75a9,
title = "Methodische Defizite in der Neuroethik: Ben{\"o}tigen wir eine theoretische Neuroethik?",
abstract = "Current neuroethics can be characterized best as empirical neuroethics: it is strongly empirically oriented in that it not only includes empirical findings from neuroscience but also searches for applications within neuroscience. This, however, neglects the social and political contexts which could be subject to a future social neuroethics. In addition, methodological issues need to be considered as in theoretical neuroethics. The focus in this article is on two such methodological issues: (1) the analysis of the different levels and their inferences among each other which is exemplified by the inference of consciousness from the otherwise purely neuronal data in patients with vegetative state and (2) the problem of linking descriptive and normative concepts in a non-reductive and non-inferential way for which I suggest the mutual contextualization between both concepts. This results in a methodological strategy that can be described as contextual fact-norm iterativity.",
keywords = "Contextual fact-norm iterativity, Empirical neuroethics, Levels of analysis, Social neuroethics, Theoretical neuroethics",
author = "G. Northoff",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s00115-013-3732-9",
language = "德语",
volume = "84",
pages = "1196--1202",
journal = "Der Nervenarzt",
issn = "0028-2804",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodische Defizite in der Neuroethik

T2 - Benötigen wir eine theoretische Neuroethik?

AU - Northoff, G.

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Current neuroethics can be characterized best as empirical neuroethics: it is strongly empirically oriented in that it not only includes empirical findings from neuroscience but also searches for applications within neuroscience. This, however, neglects the social and political contexts which could be subject to a future social neuroethics. In addition, methodological issues need to be considered as in theoretical neuroethics. The focus in this article is on two such methodological issues: (1) the analysis of the different levels and their inferences among each other which is exemplified by the inference of consciousness from the otherwise purely neuronal data in patients with vegetative state and (2) the problem of linking descriptive and normative concepts in a non-reductive and non-inferential way for which I suggest the mutual contextualization between both concepts. This results in a methodological strategy that can be described as contextual fact-norm iterativity.

AB - Current neuroethics can be characterized best as empirical neuroethics: it is strongly empirically oriented in that it not only includes empirical findings from neuroscience but also searches for applications within neuroscience. This, however, neglects the social and political contexts which could be subject to a future social neuroethics. In addition, methodological issues need to be considered as in theoretical neuroethics. The focus in this article is on two such methodological issues: (1) the analysis of the different levels and their inferences among each other which is exemplified by the inference of consciousness from the otherwise purely neuronal data in patients with vegetative state and (2) the problem of linking descriptive and normative concepts in a non-reductive and non-inferential way for which I suggest the mutual contextualization between both concepts. This results in a methodological strategy that can be described as contextual fact-norm iterativity.

KW - Contextual fact-norm iterativity

KW - Empirical neuroethics

KW - Levels of analysis

KW - Social neuroethics

KW - Theoretical neuroethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892811821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892811821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00115-013-3732-9

DO - 10.1007/s00115-013-3732-9

M3 - 文章

VL - 84

SP - 1196

EP - 1202

JO - Der Nervenarzt

JF - Der Nervenarzt

SN - 0028-2804

IS - 10

ER -