Mental health costs and access under alternative capitation systems in Colorado

Joan R. Bloom, Teh wei Hu, Neal Wallace, Brian Cuffel, Jaclyn W. Hausman, Mei Ling Sheu, Richard Scheffler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To examine service cost and access for persons with severe mental illness under Medicaid mental health capitation payment in Colorado. Capitation contracts were made with two organizational models: community mental health centers (CMHCs) that manage and deliver services (direct capitation [DC]) and joint ventures between CMHCs and a for-profit managed care firm (managed behavioral health organization, [MBHO]) and compared to fee for service (F.F.S.). Data Sources/Study Setting. Both primary and secondary data were collected for the year prior to the new financing policy and the following two years (1995-1998). Study Design. A stratified random sample of 522 severely mentally ill subjects was selected from comparable geographic areas within the capitated and FFS regions of Colorado. Major variables include service cost, utilization, and access (probability of service use) derived from secondary claims data, subject reported access collected at six-month intervals, and baseline outcomes (symptoms, functioning, and quality of life). Principal Findings. In comparison to the FFS area, cost per person was reduced in the capitated areas in each of the two years following implementation. By the end of year two, cost per person was reduced by two-thirds in the MBHO areas and by one-fifth in the DC areas. Reductions in access were found for both capitated areas, although reductions in utilization for those receiving service were found only in the MBHO model. Conclusions. Medicaid mental health capitation in Colorado resulted in cost reducing service changes for persons with severe mental illness. Assessment of outcome change is necessary to identify cost effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-340
Number of pages26
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Care Costs
Mental Health
mental health
Costs and Cost Analysis
Community Mental Health Centers
costs
Medicaid
Organizations
human being
Health
Hospital-Physician Joint Ventures
Organizational Models
organization
mental illness
Fee-for-Service Plans
Information Storage and Retrieval
Mentally Ill Persons
Managed Care Programs
health
utilization

Keywords

  • Capitation
  • Managed care
  • Mental health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Bloom, J. R., Hu, T. W., Wallace, N., Cuffel, B., Hausman, J. W., Sheu, M. L., & Scheffler, R. (2002). Mental health costs and access under alternative capitation systems in Colorado. Health Services Research, 37(2), 315-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.025

Mental health costs and access under alternative capitation systems in Colorado. / Bloom, Joan R.; Hu, Teh wei; Wallace, Neal; Cuffel, Brian; Hausman, Jaclyn W.; Sheu, Mei Ling; Scheffler, Richard.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 37, No. 2, 04.2002, p. 315-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bloom, JR, Hu, TW, Wallace, N, Cuffel, B, Hausman, JW, Sheu, ML & Scheffler, R 2002, 'Mental health costs and access under alternative capitation systems in Colorado', Health Services Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 315-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.025
Bloom, Joan R. ; Hu, Teh wei ; Wallace, Neal ; Cuffel, Brian ; Hausman, Jaclyn W. ; Sheu, Mei Ling ; Scheffler, Richard. / Mental health costs and access under alternative capitation systems in Colorado. In: Health Services Research. 2002 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 315-340.
@article{f18bfa10d1c24dd1b473846382d794de,
title = "Mental health costs and access under alternative capitation systems in Colorado",
abstract = "Objective. To examine service cost and access for persons with severe mental illness under Medicaid mental health capitation payment in Colorado. Capitation contracts were made with two organizational models: community mental health centers (CMHCs) that manage and deliver services (direct capitation [DC]) and joint ventures between CMHCs and a for-profit managed care firm (managed behavioral health organization, [MBHO]) and compared to fee for service (F.F.S.). Data Sources/Study Setting. Both primary and secondary data were collected for the year prior to the new financing policy and the following two years (1995-1998). Study Design. A stratified random sample of 522 severely mentally ill subjects was selected from comparable geographic areas within the capitated and FFS regions of Colorado. Major variables include service cost, utilization, and access (probability of service use) derived from secondary claims data, subject reported access collected at six-month intervals, and baseline outcomes (symptoms, functioning, and quality of life). Principal Findings. In comparison to the FFS area, cost per person was reduced in the capitated areas in each of the two years following implementation. By the end of year two, cost per person was reduced by two-thirds in the MBHO areas and by one-fifth in the DC areas. Reductions in access were found for both capitated areas, although reductions in utilization for those receiving service were found only in the MBHO model. Conclusions. Medicaid mental health capitation in Colorado resulted in cost reducing service changes for persons with severe mental illness. Assessment of outcome change is necessary to identify cost effectiveness.",
keywords = "Capitation, Managed care, Mental health",
author = "Bloom, {Joan R.} and Hu, {Teh wei} and Neal Wallace and Brian Cuffel and Hausman, {Jaclyn W.} and Sheu, {Mei Ling} and Richard Scheffler",
year = "2002",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.025",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "315--340",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental health costs and access under alternative capitation systems in Colorado

AU - Bloom, Joan R.

AU - Hu, Teh wei

AU - Wallace, Neal

AU - Cuffel, Brian

AU - Hausman, Jaclyn W.

AU - Sheu, Mei Ling

AU - Scheffler, Richard

PY - 2002/4

Y1 - 2002/4

N2 - Objective. To examine service cost and access for persons with severe mental illness under Medicaid mental health capitation payment in Colorado. Capitation contracts were made with two organizational models: community mental health centers (CMHCs) that manage and deliver services (direct capitation [DC]) and joint ventures between CMHCs and a for-profit managed care firm (managed behavioral health organization, [MBHO]) and compared to fee for service (F.F.S.). Data Sources/Study Setting. Both primary and secondary data were collected for the year prior to the new financing policy and the following two years (1995-1998). Study Design. A stratified random sample of 522 severely mentally ill subjects was selected from comparable geographic areas within the capitated and FFS regions of Colorado. Major variables include service cost, utilization, and access (probability of service use) derived from secondary claims data, subject reported access collected at six-month intervals, and baseline outcomes (symptoms, functioning, and quality of life). Principal Findings. In comparison to the FFS area, cost per person was reduced in the capitated areas in each of the two years following implementation. By the end of year two, cost per person was reduced by two-thirds in the MBHO areas and by one-fifth in the DC areas. Reductions in access were found for both capitated areas, although reductions in utilization for those receiving service were found only in the MBHO model. Conclusions. Medicaid mental health capitation in Colorado resulted in cost reducing service changes for persons with severe mental illness. Assessment of outcome change is necessary to identify cost effectiveness.

AB - Objective. To examine service cost and access for persons with severe mental illness under Medicaid mental health capitation payment in Colorado. Capitation contracts were made with two organizational models: community mental health centers (CMHCs) that manage and deliver services (direct capitation [DC]) and joint ventures between CMHCs and a for-profit managed care firm (managed behavioral health organization, [MBHO]) and compared to fee for service (F.F.S.). Data Sources/Study Setting. Both primary and secondary data were collected for the year prior to the new financing policy and the following two years (1995-1998). Study Design. A stratified random sample of 522 severely mentally ill subjects was selected from comparable geographic areas within the capitated and FFS regions of Colorado. Major variables include service cost, utilization, and access (probability of service use) derived from secondary claims data, subject reported access collected at six-month intervals, and baseline outcomes (symptoms, functioning, and quality of life). Principal Findings. In comparison to the FFS area, cost per person was reduced in the capitated areas in each of the two years following implementation. By the end of year two, cost per person was reduced by two-thirds in the MBHO areas and by one-fifth in the DC areas. Reductions in access were found for both capitated areas, although reductions in utilization for those receiving service were found only in the MBHO model. Conclusions. Medicaid mental health capitation in Colorado resulted in cost reducing service changes for persons with severe mental illness. Assessment of outcome change is necessary to identify cost effectiveness.

KW - Capitation

KW - Managed care

KW - Mental health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036547518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036547518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.025

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.025

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 315

EP - 340

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 2

ER -