Memory-focused interventions for people with cognitive disorders

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Hui Ling Yang, Pi Tuan Chan, Pi Chen Chang, Huei Ling Chiu, Shu Tai Sheen Hsiao, Hsin Chu, Kuei Ru Chou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A better understanding of people with cognitive disorders improves performance on memory tasks through memory-focused interventions are needed. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of memoryfocused interventions on cognitive disorders through a meta-analysis. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: The online electronic databases PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Ovid-Medline, CINHAL, PsycINFO, Ageline, and Embase (up to May 2017) were used in this study. No language restriction was applied to the search. Review methods: Objective memory (learning and memory function, immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition) was the primary indicator and subjective memory performance, global cognitive function, and depression were the secondary indicators. The Hedges' g of change, subgroup analyses, and meta-regression were analyzed on the basis of the characteristics of people with cognitive disorders. Results: A total of 27 studies (2177 participants, mean age = 75.80) reporting RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicated a medium-to-large effect of memory-focused interventions on learning and memory function (Hedges' g = 0.62) and subjective memory performance (Hedges' g = 0.67), a small-to-medium effect on delayed recall and depression, and a small effect on immediate recall and global cognitive function (all p. <. 0.05) compared with the control. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression indicated that the effects on learning and memory function were more profound in the format of memory training, individual training, shorter treatment duration, and more than eight treatment sessions, and the effect size indicated the MMSE score was the most crucial indicator (β = -0.06, p = 0.04). Conclusions: This is first comprehensive meta-analysis of special memory domains in people with cognitive disorders. The results revealed that memory-focused interventions effectively improved memory-related performance in people with cognitive disorders. An appropriately designed intervention can effectively improve memory function, reduce disability progression, and improve mood state in people with cognitive disorders. Additional randomized controlled trials including measures of recognition, global cognitive function, and depression should be conducted and analyzed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-51
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume78
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Learning
Cognition
Depression
Short-Term Memory
Regression Analysis
Information Storage and Retrieval
Age Factors
PubMed
Libraries
Language
Randomized Controlled Trials
Databases

Keywords

  • Cognitive disorders
  • Dementia
  • Memory rehabilitation
  • Memory training
  • Memory-focused interventions
  • Meta-analysis
  • Mild cognitive impairment
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Memory-focused interventions for people with cognitive disorders : A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. / Yang, Hui Ling; Chan, Pi Tuan; Chang, Pi Chen; Chiu, Huei Ling; Sheen Hsiao, Shu Tai; Chu, Hsin; Chou, Kuei Ru.

In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 78, 02.2018, p. 44-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2a31db4aa2824e7ab512d3ce2f44a973,
title = "Memory-focused interventions for people with cognitive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies",
abstract = "Background: A better understanding of people with cognitive disorders improves performance on memory tasks through memory-focused interventions are needed. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of memoryfocused interventions on cognitive disorders through a meta-analysis. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: The online electronic databases PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Ovid-Medline, CINHAL, PsycINFO, Ageline, and Embase (up to May 2017) were used in this study. No language restriction was applied to the search. Review methods: Objective memory (learning and memory function, immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition) was the primary indicator and subjective memory performance, global cognitive function, and depression were the secondary indicators. The Hedges' g of change, subgroup analyses, and meta-regression were analyzed on the basis of the characteristics of people with cognitive disorders. Results: A total of 27 studies (2177 participants, mean age = 75.80) reporting RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicated a medium-to-large effect of memory-focused interventions on learning and memory function (Hedges' g = 0.62) and subjective memory performance (Hedges' g = 0.67), a small-to-medium effect on delayed recall and depression, and a small effect on immediate recall and global cognitive function (all p. <. 0.05) compared with the control. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression indicated that the effects on learning and memory function were more profound in the format of memory training, individual training, shorter treatment duration, and more than eight treatment sessions, and the effect size indicated the MMSE score was the most crucial indicator (β = -0.06, p = 0.04). Conclusions: This is first comprehensive meta-analysis of special memory domains in people with cognitive disorders. The results revealed that memory-focused interventions effectively improved memory-related performance in people with cognitive disorders. An appropriately designed intervention can effectively improve memory function, reduce disability progression, and improve mood state in people with cognitive disorders. Additional randomized controlled trials including measures of recognition, global cognitive function, and depression should be conducted and analyzed.",
keywords = "Cognitive disorders, Dementia, Memory rehabilitation, Memory training, Memory-focused interventions, Meta-analysis, Mild cognitive impairment, Systematic review",
author = "Yang, {Hui Ling} and Chan, {Pi Tuan} and Chang, {Pi Chen} and Chiu, {Huei Ling} and {Sheen Hsiao}, {Shu Tai} and Hsin Chu and Chou, {Kuei Ru}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.005",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "44--51",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Memory-focused interventions for people with cognitive disorders

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

AU - Yang, Hui Ling

AU - Chan, Pi Tuan

AU - Chang, Pi Chen

AU - Chiu, Huei Ling

AU - Sheen Hsiao, Shu Tai

AU - Chu, Hsin

AU - Chou, Kuei Ru

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - Background: A better understanding of people with cognitive disorders improves performance on memory tasks through memory-focused interventions are needed. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of memoryfocused interventions on cognitive disorders through a meta-analysis. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: The online electronic databases PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Ovid-Medline, CINHAL, PsycINFO, Ageline, and Embase (up to May 2017) were used in this study. No language restriction was applied to the search. Review methods: Objective memory (learning and memory function, immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition) was the primary indicator and subjective memory performance, global cognitive function, and depression were the secondary indicators. The Hedges' g of change, subgroup analyses, and meta-regression were analyzed on the basis of the characteristics of people with cognitive disorders. Results: A total of 27 studies (2177 participants, mean age = 75.80) reporting RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicated a medium-to-large effect of memory-focused interventions on learning and memory function (Hedges' g = 0.62) and subjective memory performance (Hedges' g = 0.67), a small-to-medium effect on delayed recall and depression, and a small effect on immediate recall and global cognitive function (all p. <. 0.05) compared with the control. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression indicated that the effects on learning and memory function were more profound in the format of memory training, individual training, shorter treatment duration, and more than eight treatment sessions, and the effect size indicated the MMSE score was the most crucial indicator (β = -0.06, p = 0.04). Conclusions: This is first comprehensive meta-analysis of special memory domains in people with cognitive disorders. The results revealed that memory-focused interventions effectively improved memory-related performance in people with cognitive disorders. An appropriately designed intervention can effectively improve memory function, reduce disability progression, and improve mood state in people with cognitive disorders. Additional randomized controlled trials including measures of recognition, global cognitive function, and depression should be conducted and analyzed.

AB - Background: A better understanding of people with cognitive disorders improves performance on memory tasks through memory-focused interventions are needed. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of memoryfocused interventions on cognitive disorders through a meta-analysis. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: The online electronic databases PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Ovid-Medline, CINHAL, PsycINFO, Ageline, and Embase (up to May 2017) were used in this study. No language restriction was applied to the search. Review methods: Objective memory (learning and memory function, immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition) was the primary indicator and subjective memory performance, global cognitive function, and depression were the secondary indicators. The Hedges' g of change, subgroup analyses, and meta-regression were analyzed on the basis of the characteristics of people with cognitive disorders. Results: A total of 27 studies (2177 participants, mean age = 75.80) reporting RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicated a medium-to-large effect of memory-focused interventions on learning and memory function (Hedges' g = 0.62) and subjective memory performance (Hedges' g = 0.67), a small-to-medium effect on delayed recall and depression, and a small effect on immediate recall and global cognitive function (all p. <. 0.05) compared with the control. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression indicated that the effects on learning and memory function were more profound in the format of memory training, individual training, shorter treatment duration, and more than eight treatment sessions, and the effect size indicated the MMSE score was the most crucial indicator (β = -0.06, p = 0.04). Conclusions: This is first comprehensive meta-analysis of special memory domains in people with cognitive disorders. The results revealed that memory-focused interventions effectively improved memory-related performance in people with cognitive disorders. An appropriately designed intervention can effectively improve memory function, reduce disability progression, and improve mood state in people with cognitive disorders. Additional randomized controlled trials including measures of recognition, global cognitive function, and depression should be conducted and analyzed.

KW - Cognitive disorders

KW - Dementia

KW - Memory rehabilitation

KW - Memory training

KW - Memory-focused interventions

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Mild cognitive impairment

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032225295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032225295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.005

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 44

EP - 51

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

SN - 0020-7489

ER -