Abstract

Objective: To investigate the incidence and aetiology of medical errors in a hospital in Taiwan and to propose effective solutions for their prevention. Design: Retrospective audit. Setting: An 800 bed general hospital in Taiwan with a computerised physician order entry system and prescription delivery system. Methods: We collected and analysed 1,462 filed incident reports covering the period 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2002. Errors were categorised into one of three types: medication, medical or administration errors. They were further analysed to see if they resulted in patient harm. Medication errors were also further analysed to identify the type of error. Results: The number of medication, medical and administration errors were 254 (17.3%), 736 (50.4%) and 472 (32.3%), respectively. Based on the number of patients treated in the hospital and the number of prescriptions written, the calculated medical error rate was less than 0.1% and the medication error rate was less than 0.01%. 8% of incidents resulted in injury to patients. The most common medication errors were omitted drug, wrong drug and wrong dose. Conclusions: Compared with other studies, the medical and medication error rates in this study are very low. This may be a reflection of the benefits of computerised physician order entry and prescription delivery, but may also be due to under-reporting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-18
Number of pages8
JournalJournal on Information Technology in Healthcare
Volume2
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Medical Errors
Medication Errors
Taiwan
Medical Order Entry Systems
Prescriptions
Incidence
Patient Harm
General Hospitals
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Hospital beds
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Medical errors in a hospital in Taiwan : Incidence, aetiology and proposed solutions. / Chen, Chang-I; Liu, Chien-Tsai; Chen, Chieh-Feng; Li, Yu-Chuan; Chao, Chia Cheng.

In: Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2004, p. 11-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{38341e5df2d6483fb875514fb8041ccb,
title = "Medical errors in a hospital in Taiwan: Incidence, aetiology and proposed solutions",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the incidence and aetiology of medical errors in a hospital in Taiwan and to propose effective solutions for their prevention. Design: Retrospective audit. Setting: An 800 bed general hospital in Taiwan with a computerised physician order entry system and prescription delivery system. Methods: We collected and analysed 1,462 filed incident reports covering the period 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2002. Errors were categorised into one of three types: medication, medical or administration errors. They were further analysed to see if they resulted in patient harm. Medication errors were also further analysed to identify the type of error. Results: The number of medication, medical and administration errors were 254 (17.3{\%}), 736 (50.4{\%}) and 472 (32.3{\%}), respectively. Based on the number of patients treated in the hospital and the number of prescriptions written, the calculated medical error rate was less than 0.1{\%} and the medication error rate was less than 0.01{\%}. 8{\%} of incidents resulted in injury to patients. The most common medication errors were omitted drug, wrong drug and wrong dose. Conclusions: Compared with other studies, the medical and medication error rates in this study are very low. This may be a reflection of the benefits of computerised physician order entry and prescription delivery, but may also be due to under-reporting.",
author = "Chang-I Chen and Chien-Tsai Liu and Chieh-Feng Chen and Yu-Chuan Li and Chao, {Chia Cheng}",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "11--18",
journal = "Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare",
issn = "1479-649X",
publisher = "Optimum",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical errors in a hospital in Taiwan

T2 - Incidence, aetiology and proposed solutions

AU - Chen, Chang-I

AU - Liu, Chien-Tsai

AU - Chen, Chieh-Feng

AU - Li, Yu-Chuan

AU - Chao, Chia Cheng

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Objective: To investigate the incidence and aetiology of medical errors in a hospital in Taiwan and to propose effective solutions for their prevention. Design: Retrospective audit. Setting: An 800 bed general hospital in Taiwan with a computerised physician order entry system and prescription delivery system. Methods: We collected and analysed 1,462 filed incident reports covering the period 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2002. Errors were categorised into one of three types: medication, medical or administration errors. They were further analysed to see if they resulted in patient harm. Medication errors were also further analysed to identify the type of error. Results: The number of medication, medical and administration errors were 254 (17.3%), 736 (50.4%) and 472 (32.3%), respectively. Based on the number of patients treated in the hospital and the number of prescriptions written, the calculated medical error rate was less than 0.1% and the medication error rate was less than 0.01%. 8% of incidents resulted in injury to patients. The most common medication errors were omitted drug, wrong drug and wrong dose. Conclusions: Compared with other studies, the medical and medication error rates in this study are very low. This may be a reflection of the benefits of computerised physician order entry and prescription delivery, but may also be due to under-reporting.

AB - Objective: To investigate the incidence and aetiology of medical errors in a hospital in Taiwan and to propose effective solutions for their prevention. Design: Retrospective audit. Setting: An 800 bed general hospital in Taiwan with a computerised physician order entry system and prescription delivery system. Methods: We collected and analysed 1,462 filed incident reports covering the period 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2002. Errors were categorised into one of three types: medication, medical or administration errors. They were further analysed to see if they resulted in patient harm. Medication errors were also further analysed to identify the type of error. Results: The number of medication, medical and administration errors were 254 (17.3%), 736 (50.4%) and 472 (32.3%), respectively. Based on the number of patients treated in the hospital and the number of prescriptions written, the calculated medical error rate was less than 0.1% and the medication error rate was less than 0.01%. 8% of incidents resulted in injury to patients. The most common medication errors were omitted drug, wrong drug and wrong dose. Conclusions: Compared with other studies, the medical and medication error rates in this study are very low. This may be a reflection of the benefits of computerised physician order entry and prescription delivery, but may also be due to under-reporting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442650264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442650264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 11

EP - 18

JO - Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare

JF - Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare

SN - 1479-649X

IS - 1

ER -