Measuring inequality in physician distributions using spatially adjusted Gini coefficients

Yi Hsin Elsa Hsu, Wender Lin, Joseph J. Tien, Larry Y. Tzeng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To measure inequality in physician distributions using Gini coefficient and spatially adjusted Gini coefficients. Design: Measurements were based on the distribution of physician data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) and population data from the Ministry of the Interior in Taiwan. Settings: The distribution of population and physicians in Taiwan from 2001 to 2010. Participants: This study considered 35 000 physicians who are registered in Taiwan. Main Outcome Measures: To calculate the Gini coefficient and spatially adjusted Gini coefficients in Taiwan from 2001 to 2010. Results: The Gini coefficient for each year, from 2001 to 2010, ranged from 0.5128 to 0.4692, while the spatially adjusted Gini coefficients based on travel time and travel distance ranged, respectively, from 0.4324 to 0.4066 and from 0.4408 to 0.4178. We found that, in each year, irrespective of the type of spatial adjustment, the spatially adjusted Gini coefficient was smaller than the Gini coefficient itself. Our empirical findings support that the Gini coefficient may overestimate the maldistribution of physicians. Conclusions: Our simulations demonstrate that increasing the number of physicians in mediumsized cities (such as capitals of counties or provinces), and/or improving the transportation time between medium-sized cities and rural areas, could be feasible solutions to mitigate the problem of geographical maldistribution of physicians.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)657-664
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Taiwan
Physicians
National Health Programs
Economics
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Geographic correlation
  • Gini coefficient
  • Physician inequality
  • Spatial statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Measuring inequality in physician distributions using spatially adjusted Gini coefficients. / Hsu, Yi Hsin Elsa; Lin, Wender; Tien, Joseph J.; Tzeng, Larry Y.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2016, p. 657-664.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6667a1e06a8d4029b42ce78863c1891c,
title = "Measuring inequality in physician distributions using spatially adjusted Gini coefficients",
abstract = "Objective: To measure inequality in physician distributions using Gini coefficient and spatially adjusted Gini coefficients. Design: Measurements were based on the distribution of physician data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) and population data from the Ministry of the Interior in Taiwan. Settings: The distribution of population and physicians in Taiwan from 2001 to 2010. Participants: This study considered 35 000 physicians who are registered in Taiwan. Main Outcome Measures: To calculate the Gini coefficient and spatially adjusted Gini coefficients in Taiwan from 2001 to 2010. Results: The Gini coefficient for each year, from 2001 to 2010, ranged from 0.5128 to 0.4692, while the spatially adjusted Gini coefficients based on travel time and travel distance ranged, respectively, from 0.4324 to 0.4066 and from 0.4408 to 0.4178. We found that, in each year, irrespective of the type of spatial adjustment, the spatially adjusted Gini coefficient was smaller than the Gini coefficient itself. Our empirical findings support that the Gini coefficient may overestimate the maldistribution of physicians. Conclusions: Our simulations demonstrate that increasing the number of physicians in mediumsized cities (such as capitals of counties or provinces), and/or improving the transportation time between medium-sized cities and rural areas, could be feasible solutions to mitigate the problem of geographical maldistribution of physicians.",
keywords = "Geographic correlation, Gini coefficient, Physician inequality, Spatial statistics",
author = "Hsu, {Yi Hsin Elsa} and Wender Lin and Tien, {Joseph J.} and Tzeng, {Larry Y.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzw110",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "657--664",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring inequality in physician distributions using spatially adjusted Gini coefficients

AU - Hsu, Yi Hsin Elsa

AU - Lin, Wender

AU - Tien, Joseph J.

AU - Tzeng, Larry Y.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Objective: To measure inequality in physician distributions using Gini coefficient and spatially adjusted Gini coefficients. Design: Measurements were based on the distribution of physician data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) and population data from the Ministry of the Interior in Taiwan. Settings: The distribution of population and physicians in Taiwan from 2001 to 2010. Participants: This study considered 35 000 physicians who are registered in Taiwan. Main Outcome Measures: To calculate the Gini coefficient and spatially adjusted Gini coefficients in Taiwan from 2001 to 2010. Results: The Gini coefficient for each year, from 2001 to 2010, ranged from 0.5128 to 0.4692, while the spatially adjusted Gini coefficients based on travel time and travel distance ranged, respectively, from 0.4324 to 0.4066 and from 0.4408 to 0.4178. We found that, in each year, irrespective of the type of spatial adjustment, the spatially adjusted Gini coefficient was smaller than the Gini coefficient itself. Our empirical findings support that the Gini coefficient may overestimate the maldistribution of physicians. Conclusions: Our simulations demonstrate that increasing the number of physicians in mediumsized cities (such as capitals of counties or provinces), and/or improving the transportation time between medium-sized cities and rural areas, could be feasible solutions to mitigate the problem of geographical maldistribution of physicians.

AB - Objective: To measure inequality in physician distributions using Gini coefficient and spatially adjusted Gini coefficients. Design: Measurements were based on the distribution of physician data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) and population data from the Ministry of the Interior in Taiwan. Settings: The distribution of population and physicians in Taiwan from 2001 to 2010. Participants: This study considered 35 000 physicians who are registered in Taiwan. Main Outcome Measures: To calculate the Gini coefficient and spatially adjusted Gini coefficients in Taiwan from 2001 to 2010. Results: The Gini coefficient for each year, from 2001 to 2010, ranged from 0.5128 to 0.4692, while the spatially adjusted Gini coefficients based on travel time and travel distance ranged, respectively, from 0.4324 to 0.4066 and from 0.4408 to 0.4178. We found that, in each year, irrespective of the type of spatial adjustment, the spatially adjusted Gini coefficient was smaller than the Gini coefficient itself. Our empirical findings support that the Gini coefficient may overestimate the maldistribution of physicians. Conclusions: Our simulations demonstrate that increasing the number of physicians in mediumsized cities (such as capitals of counties or provinces), and/or improving the transportation time between medium-sized cities and rural areas, could be feasible solutions to mitigate the problem of geographical maldistribution of physicians.

KW - Geographic correlation

KW - Gini coefficient

KW - Physician inequality

KW - Spatial statistics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014452312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014452312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzw110

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzw110

M3 - Article

C2 - 28104794

AN - SCOPUS:85014452312

VL - 28

SP - 657

EP - 664

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 6

ER -