Measuring Global Health Security: Comparison of Self- and External Evaluations for IHR Core Capacity

F.-J. Tsai, R. Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2016, the World Health Organization moved from using only a self-assessment to monitor national implementation of the International Health Regulations (IHR) to introducing an external evaluation process. In this article, we use preliminary findings from the published Joint External Evaluations to identify if and how the external evaluations differ from IHR self-assessments conducted in the same year. We found that of the 32 countries for which data were available, external assessment scores are consistently 1 to 1.5 points lower than self-assessment scores. This shows the importance of external evaluations and emphasizes that even more must be done to build sufficient capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to public health emergencies around the world.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-310
Number of pages7
JournalHealth security
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Diagnostic Self Evaluation
self assessment
self-assessment
Health
regulation
health
evaluation
Public health
World Health Organization
WHO
public health
Emergencies
Public Health
Global Health
comparison
health regulation
measuring
Self-Assessment

Keywords

  • Global health security
  • International Health Regulations
  • Joint External Evaluation

Cite this

Measuring Global Health Security: Comparison of Self- and External Evaluations for IHR Core Capacity. / Tsai, F.-J.; Katz, R.

In: Health security, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2018, p. 304-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{286160744f9a40619d902c7b223e7936,
title = "Measuring Global Health Security: Comparison of Self- and External Evaluations for IHR Core Capacity",
abstract = "In 2016, the World Health Organization moved from using only a self-assessment to monitor national implementation of the International Health Regulations (IHR) to introducing an external evaluation process. In this article, we use preliminary findings from the published Joint External Evaluations to identify if and how the external evaluations differ from IHR self-assessments conducted in the same year. We found that of the 32 countries for which data were available, external assessment scores are consistently 1 to 1.5 points lower than self-assessment scores. This shows the importance of external evaluations and emphasizes that even more must be done to build sufficient capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to public health emergencies around the world.",
keywords = "Global health security, International Health Regulations, Joint External Evaluation, Global health security, International Health Regulations, Joint External Evaluation",
author = "F.-J. Tsai and R. Katz",
note = "Export Date: 30 October 2018",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1089/hs.2018.0019",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "304--310",
journal = "Health security",
issn = "2326-5094",
publisher = "NLM (Medline)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring Global Health Security: Comparison of Self- and External Evaluations for IHR Core Capacity

AU - Tsai, F.-J.

AU - Katz, R.

N1 - Export Date: 30 October 2018

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In 2016, the World Health Organization moved from using only a self-assessment to monitor national implementation of the International Health Regulations (IHR) to introducing an external evaluation process. In this article, we use preliminary findings from the published Joint External Evaluations to identify if and how the external evaluations differ from IHR self-assessments conducted in the same year. We found that of the 32 countries for which data were available, external assessment scores are consistently 1 to 1.5 points lower than self-assessment scores. This shows the importance of external evaluations and emphasizes that even more must be done to build sufficient capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to public health emergencies around the world.

AB - In 2016, the World Health Organization moved from using only a self-assessment to monitor national implementation of the International Health Regulations (IHR) to introducing an external evaluation process. In this article, we use preliminary findings from the published Joint External Evaluations to identify if and how the external evaluations differ from IHR self-assessments conducted in the same year. We found that of the 32 countries for which data were available, external assessment scores are consistently 1 to 1.5 points lower than self-assessment scores. This shows the importance of external evaluations and emphasizes that even more must be done to build sufficient capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to public health emergencies around the world.

KW - Global health security

KW - International Health Regulations

KW - Joint External Evaluation

KW - Global health security

KW - International Health Regulations

KW - Joint External Evaluation

U2 - 10.1089/hs.2018.0019

DO - 10.1089/hs.2018.0019

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 304

EP - 310

JO - Health security

JF - Health security

SN - 2326-5094

IS - 5

ER -