Measurement of physical activity in cancer survivors: A validity study

Ching Ching Su, Kuan Der Lee, Chung Hung Yeh, Ching Chiu Kao, Chia Chin Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to validate the Taiwanese version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE-T) and to assess physical activity in Taiwanese cancer survivors. Methods: One hundred twenty-seven cancer survivors participated in this study. Instruments consisted of the PASE-T, the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-T), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and actigraph. Reliability was assessed by calculating the test-retest reliability. The validity was assessed by the content validity, criterion-related validity, convergent validity, and known-group validity. Results: The test-retest reliability of PASE-T was 0.90 over a 2-week interval, based on a sample of 30 patients. The content validity index was very acceptable at 0.91. Convergent validity was demonstrated by its significant association with MDASI-T scores (symptom severity: r = -0.23, p = 0.001; symptom interference: r = -0.21, p = 0.001) and KPS scores (r = 0.59, p <0.001). Criterion-related validity was established by a significant relationship to the actigraph total counts per minute (r = 0.64, p <0.001). Known-group validity was established by its ability to detect significant differences according to a patient's performance status. Moreover, KPS (β = 0.37), fatigue (β = -0.32), and age (β = -0.20) were significant predictors of physical activity (R 2 = 0.46). Conclusions: The PASE-T is a reliable and valid instrument for measurement of physical activity among cancer survivors in Taiwan. Implication for Cancer Survivors: This scale could be a useful measure of physical activity in cancer survivors and subsequently facilitate the quality of oncology care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-212
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cancer Survivorship
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Survivors
Exercise
Karnofsky Performance Status
Neoplasms
Reproducibility of Results
Equipment and Supplies
Quality of Health Care
Taiwan
Fatigue

Keywords

  • Cancer survivors
  • Physical activity
  • Reliability
  • Validation
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Measurement of physical activity in cancer survivors : A validity study. / Su, Ching Ching; Lee, Kuan Der; Yeh, Chung Hung; Kao, Ching Chiu; Lin, Chia Chin.

In: Journal of Cancer Survivorship, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2014, p. 205-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{91d61da86f3a4704810a8214ac4b94c4,
title = "Measurement of physical activity in cancer survivors: A validity study",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of the study was to validate the Taiwanese version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE-T) and to assess physical activity in Taiwanese cancer survivors. Methods: One hundred twenty-seven cancer survivors participated in this study. Instruments consisted of the PASE-T, the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-T), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and actigraph. Reliability was assessed by calculating the test-retest reliability. The validity was assessed by the content validity, criterion-related validity, convergent validity, and known-group validity. Results: The test-retest reliability of PASE-T was 0.90 over a 2-week interval, based on a sample of 30 patients. The content validity index was very acceptable at 0.91. Convergent validity was demonstrated by its significant association with MDASI-T scores (symptom severity: r = -0.23, p = 0.001; symptom interference: r = -0.21, p = 0.001) and KPS scores (r = 0.59, p <0.001). Criterion-related validity was established by a significant relationship to the actigraph total counts per minute (r = 0.64, p <0.001). Known-group validity was established by its ability to detect significant differences according to a patient's performance status. Moreover, KPS (β = 0.37), fatigue (β = -0.32), and age (β = -0.20) were significant predictors of physical activity (R 2 = 0.46). Conclusions: The PASE-T is a reliable and valid instrument for measurement of physical activity among cancer survivors in Taiwan. Implication for Cancer Survivors: This scale could be a useful measure of physical activity in cancer survivors and subsequently facilitate the quality of oncology care.",
keywords = "Cancer survivors, Physical activity, Reliability, Validation, Validity",
author = "Su, {Ching Ching} and Lee, {Kuan Der} and Yeh, {Chung Hung} and Kao, {Ching Chiu} and Lin, {Chia Chin}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s11764-013-0325-3",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "205--212",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Survivorship",
issn = "1932-2259",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of physical activity in cancer survivors

T2 - A validity study

AU - Su, Ching Ching

AU - Lee, Kuan Der

AU - Yeh, Chung Hung

AU - Kao, Ching Chiu

AU - Lin, Chia Chin

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of the study was to validate the Taiwanese version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE-T) and to assess physical activity in Taiwanese cancer survivors. Methods: One hundred twenty-seven cancer survivors participated in this study. Instruments consisted of the PASE-T, the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-T), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and actigraph. Reliability was assessed by calculating the test-retest reliability. The validity was assessed by the content validity, criterion-related validity, convergent validity, and known-group validity. Results: The test-retest reliability of PASE-T was 0.90 over a 2-week interval, based on a sample of 30 patients. The content validity index was very acceptable at 0.91. Convergent validity was demonstrated by its significant association with MDASI-T scores (symptom severity: r = -0.23, p = 0.001; symptom interference: r = -0.21, p = 0.001) and KPS scores (r = 0.59, p <0.001). Criterion-related validity was established by a significant relationship to the actigraph total counts per minute (r = 0.64, p <0.001). Known-group validity was established by its ability to detect significant differences according to a patient's performance status. Moreover, KPS (β = 0.37), fatigue (β = -0.32), and age (β = -0.20) were significant predictors of physical activity (R 2 = 0.46). Conclusions: The PASE-T is a reliable and valid instrument for measurement of physical activity among cancer survivors in Taiwan. Implication for Cancer Survivors: This scale could be a useful measure of physical activity in cancer survivors and subsequently facilitate the quality of oncology care.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of the study was to validate the Taiwanese version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE-T) and to assess physical activity in Taiwanese cancer survivors. Methods: One hundred twenty-seven cancer survivors participated in this study. Instruments consisted of the PASE-T, the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-T), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and actigraph. Reliability was assessed by calculating the test-retest reliability. The validity was assessed by the content validity, criterion-related validity, convergent validity, and known-group validity. Results: The test-retest reliability of PASE-T was 0.90 over a 2-week interval, based on a sample of 30 patients. The content validity index was very acceptable at 0.91. Convergent validity was demonstrated by its significant association with MDASI-T scores (symptom severity: r = -0.23, p = 0.001; symptom interference: r = -0.21, p = 0.001) and KPS scores (r = 0.59, p <0.001). Criterion-related validity was established by a significant relationship to the actigraph total counts per minute (r = 0.64, p <0.001). Known-group validity was established by its ability to detect significant differences according to a patient's performance status. Moreover, KPS (β = 0.37), fatigue (β = -0.32), and age (β = -0.20) were significant predictors of physical activity (R 2 = 0.46). Conclusions: The PASE-T is a reliable and valid instrument for measurement of physical activity among cancer survivors in Taiwan. Implication for Cancer Survivors: This scale could be a useful measure of physical activity in cancer survivors and subsequently facilitate the quality of oncology care.

KW - Cancer survivors

KW - Physical activity

KW - Reliability

KW - Validation

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900325457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900325457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11764-013-0325-3

DO - 10.1007/s11764-013-0325-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 24317970

AN - SCOPUS:84900325457

VL - 8

SP - 205

EP - 212

JO - Journal of Cancer Survivorship

JF - Journal of Cancer Survivorship

SN - 1932-2259

IS - 2

ER -