Mean arterial pressure is better at predicting future metabolic syndrome in the normotensive elderly: A prospective cohort study in Taiwan

Chun Hsien Hsu, Jin Biou Chang, I. Chao Liu, Shu Chuen Lau, Shu Man Yu, Chang Hsun Hsieh, Jiunn Diann Lin, Yao Jen Liang, Dee Pei, Yen Lin Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare four different blood pressure (BP) measurements-systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP)-in predicting future metabolic syndrome (MetS) among the normotensive elderly population, and to estimate the optimal cutoff value of the best single measurement for clinical practice. Methods: A total of 2782 non-medicated participants aged ≥ 60. years were enrolled in a standard health examination program in Taiwan from January 2004 to December 2013. Two thirds of the participants were randomly designated as the training group (n = 1855) and the other one third as the validation group (n = 927). The mean follow-up time was 3.60. years for both the training and validation groups. MAP and PP were calculated from SBP and DBP. Results: SBP, DBP, and MAP were associated with future MetS, whereas PP was not. MAP had the largest hazard ratio in Cox regression (men 1.342 [95% CI 1.158-1.555] and women 1.348 [95% CI 1.185-1.534] in the training group; men 1.640 [95% CI 1.317-2.041] and women 1.485 [95% CI 1.230-1.794] in the validation group) and the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (men 0.598 ± 0.021 and women 0.602 ± 0.021 in the training group). Multivariable Cox regression further indicated that a higher MAP level was independently associated with the future occurrence of MetS. Participants with MAP above the cutoff value (84.0. mm Hg for men, 83.3. mm Hg for women) had a higher cumulative incidence of MetS than did their counterparts after four years' follow-up in both the training and validation groups. The results derived from the training data could be replicated in the validation data, indicating that the results were generalizable across distinct samples. Conclusions: MAP is more accurate than SBP, DBP, and PP in predicting future MetS among the normotensive geriatric population. Calculation of MAP is recommended when dealing with normotensive patients aged ≥ 60. years in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-82
Number of pages7
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume72
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2015

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Elderly
  • Mean arterial pressure
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Preventive geriatrics
  • Primary prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this